• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Request for Help re 911 Debunking

Email sent SezMe. :) Thanks. I hope some of you can tune in. Remember, that's tomorrow, January 5th, 2006 @ 8PM Eastern.

I can't post links, but visit thedebatehour site for more info.

See you there.

-- Reggie Finley Sr.
 
Nice job Reginald & Roger. We really enjoyed the show. And appreciate the time extension. Reg Any chance that there would be a follow up or part 2? Now that we know how the call in, video and chat room works there are many here who would no doubt participate. Thanks again.
 
infidelguy said:
Email sent SezMe. :) Thanks. I hope some of you can tune in. Remember, that's tomorrow, January 5th, 2006 @ 8PM Eastern.

I can't post links, but visit thedebatehour site for more info.

See you there.

-- Reggie Finley Sr.
Click to expand...
Hi Reggie -

Glad I tuned in. I posted a lot of the commentary on the other thread, based on my frustration that this lying sack of turds, Berger, got so much play and was so adept at taking over the show. I don't know how the guy sleeps nights. Maybe he can no longer help himself. Maybe he's lied about so much, for so long, that his rewired "brain" can no longer discern between lies and truth.

Stupid people will gravitate to Berger. In one sense that is good - at least now we'll know where all the stupid people are.

I'll be tuning in to more of your shows - your site added to my Favorites - and will spread the word as well.

I'm hoping for a shellacking from the Good Guys next time one of these speakers of Weal Twoof gets ahold of a microphone.
 
A W Smith said:
Nice job Reginald & Roger. We really enjoyed the show. And appreciate the time extension. Reg Any chance that there would be a follow up or part 2? Now that we know how the call in, video and chat room works there are many here who would no doubt participate. Thanks again.
Click to expand...
I doubt that the Spewer of Turds, Berger, would agree to a rematch. Now that we know his tactics. Berger's disadvantage is that he cannot change his tactics - they're all he's got. Therefore, they can be analyzed and neutralized.
 
Bell said:
Tip from a non-debater: STAY ON TOPIC! CTers like to jump from claim to claim.

For example when you start to debunk the controlled demo of the Twin Towers, don't let the host jump onto "but how did WTC7 collapse if it wasn't on fire?" Ignore that question and return to the Twin Towers.
Click to expand...

When insisting on staying on topic in forums I find it very useful to firmly and politely state that is what I wish to do.

ie. Do you have nothing else to add concerning (the original topic) or do you wish to move on to (the new topic) now?

This definitively marks the change of topic occured when they could no longer continue against you on the original.

A few years ago I had an Apollo Hoax believer doing the change of topic thing and so everytime she started a new topic I would start a new thread dedicated to that topic (Van Allen Belts, dust falls too quickly, Una's coke bottle etc.) and informed her I would address it only in that thread. Such would not translate to a radio show but you can ensure that everytime the topic is changed that the audience is made aware that you had the last say on the previous topic because the CT gave in and switched gears.
 
ConspiRaider said:
I doubt that the Spewer of Turds, Berger, would agree to a rematch. Now that we know his tactics. Berger's disadvantage is that he cannot change his tactics - they're all he's got. Therefore, they can be analyzed and neutralized.
Click to expand...

I agree. Berger will not get much better. However SezMe will only get better. He knows what to expect. Now we have at least two people who have experience debating 9/11.

I am sure there will be rematches. You can even get a friendly host and then challenge a 9/11 person to debate with you, rather than wait for them to organise a host friendly to them.
 
A Boeing 767 weighs approx 150 times what Lidle's plane weighed, and flew approx 3 times as fast. The 767 had a max fuel capacity of 24,000 gallons while Lidle's plane held less than 100 gallons.

So the kinetic energy of a 767 going full bore is about 1400 times as much as a small plane such a s Lidle's going as fast as it possibly could. The max fuel load of a 767 weighs more than Lidle's entire aircraft.

For comparison, the 90 gallons or so of fuel that is the maximum that Lidle's plane could hold, would power a 767 for about 30 miles, about 4 minutes at 500 MPH.
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom