• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Merged Remember the West Memphis 3?

Yes, completely ignore Misskelley's - one of the murderers - detailed, accurate and frank confession, made entirely voluntarily, with his father's consent, and against the wishes of his attorneys.

It's your prerogative, but perhaps you should be less taken in by documentaries made by defence attorneys. It's interesting that the public prefer to believe a tv programme than a properly ordered court of law.

You're in good company. There are plenty of people who believe soap opera characters are real and even that common criminals, for example, Ronnie Biggs, are folk heroes.


Nice deflection.

How are you doing with finding that evidence that the victims' stomach contents were tested and shown to be urine, just to focus one of your points.
 
To religious fanatics, it's all the same animal. Satanism, Wicca, ceremonial magic, even a lot of fluffy-bunny New Age nonsense like crystal waving and horoscopes. It's all satanic and evil and barely a step above human sacrifice.

It should be obvious that the killing of the three boys was a satanist sacrifice. We have Misskelley's own confession and the testimony of a friend of his who was so disturbed by what Misskelley told him, wrote to the police to reveal Echols had invoked a prayer before throwing the three boys down.

Indeed, the murders have the signature of immature young adults, 'having a laugh', insanity (Echols has a history) and childish callow youth occult embellishments, the shoe lace tying with multiple knots, the blue wax, the ritual degradation of the victims (castration, urinating in their mouths), the invocation by prayer, the ribald hooliganism of getting drunk on beer and whiskey.

Echols to this day is a crazy satanist who could probably get a PhD in Aleister Crowley.

Here's a picture of his hero, together with his girlfriend of the time, Domini Teer. Note the studied hand symbolism. Note Amanda Knox makes a similar signal.

Bonkers? Yes. Childish? Indeed.

But these people took their play acting to the depraved tragic limit.
 

Attachments

  • crowley-domini-teer.jpg
    crowley-domini-teer.jpg
    38.6 KB · Views: 1
  • echols hand.jpg
    echols hand.jpg
    7.3 KB · Views: 110
  • ak hand.jpg
    ak hand.jpg
    32.6 KB · Views: 1
Last edited:
Still no citation for the claim of urine in the stomachs. I don't know how else you tie a lace other than with knots. The "castration" (of one boy) happened after death and has the hallmarks of post-mortem damage by scavenging animals. I have no idea what this "blue wax" thing even is.
 
It should be obvious that the killing of the three boys was a satanist sacrifice. We have Misskelley's own confession and the testimony of a friend of his who was so disturbed by what Misskelley told him, wrote to the police to reveal Echols had invoked a prayer before throwing the three boys down.

Indeed, the murders have the signature of immature young adults, 'having a laugh', insanity (Echols has a history) and childish callow youth occult embellishments, the shoe lace tying with multiple knots, the blue wax, the ritual degradation of the victims (castration, urinating in their mouths), the invocation by prayer, the ribald hooliganism of getting drunk on beer and whiskey.

Echols to this day is a crazy satanist who could probably get a PhD in Aleister Crowley.

Here's a picture of his hero, together with his girlfriend of the time, Domini Teer. Note the studied hand symbolism. Note Amanda Knox makes a similar signal.

Bonkers? Yes. Childish? Indeed.

But these people took their play acting to the depraved tragic limit.

Sad, ridiculous and infuriating. In equal proportions. Childish? Indeed.
 
Still no citation for the claim of urine in the stomachs. I don't know how else you tie a lace other than with knots. The "castration" (of one boy) happened after death and has the hallmarks of post-mortem damage by scavenging animals. I have no idea what this "blue wax" thing even is.

There was a spot of blue wax on Steven Branch's shirt, Domini Teer had a blue candle in her home, ergo the WM3 are guilty and it was Satanism.

:rolleyes:
 
It should be obvious that the killing of the three boys was a satanist sacrifice.


To a religious fanatic, yes. To anyone else who actually knows something about satanism and the myriad of other belief systems that religious fanatics denote as satanism, not so much.

Echols to this day is a crazy satanist who could probably get a PhD in Aleister Crowley.


Again proving your profound ignorance. Crowley is not even remotely connected to satanism except in the mind of ignorant religious fanatics. Crowley's philosophy was a mishmash of Gnosticism, a distorted version of Egyptian religious tradition, and various hermetic mystical traditions. After religious fanatics started calling him a satanist, he played to their prejudices to wind them up. He was little more than yet another religious con man who enjoyed the notoriety that the popular misconception gave him.

But I full expect that you won't understand any of that, given your fixation on the most ridiculous caricatures of people and their belief systems.

If you weren't so consistent and persistent with your ignorance and lies, I'd call Poe.

You know perfectly well that is not the sum of the evidence.


It is, however, the sum of your arguments, seeing as you have yet to provide anything resembling verifiable evidence from primary sources.
 
Last edited:
To a religious fanatic, yes. To anyone else who actually knows something about satanism and the myriad of other belief systems that religious fanatics denote as satanism, not so much.




Again proving your profound ignorance. Crowley is not even remotely connected to satanism except in the mind of ignorant religious fanatics. Crowley's philosophy was a mishmash of Gnosticism, a distorted version of Egyptian religious tradition, and various hermetic mystical traditions. After religious fanatics started calling him a satanist, he played to their prejudices to wind them up. He was little more than yet another religious con man who enjoyed the notoriety that the popular misconception gave him.

But I full expect that you won't understand any of that, given your fixation on the most ridiculous caricatures of people and their belief systems.

If you weren't so consistent and persistent with your ignorance and lies, I'd call Poe.




It is, however, the sum of your arguments, seeing as you have yet to provide anything resembling verifiable evidence from primary sources.


Sorry to call Aleister Crowley a satanist, when of course, he is a 'ceremonial magician'! Silly me.
 
Sorry to call Aleister Crowley a satanist, when of course, he is a 'ceremonial magician'! Silly me.


Yes, it is profoundly silly to anyone intelligent and educated enough to understand the immense difference between the two.

It's like calling all Muslims "pagans" or "heretics" because they're not Christian.
 
Yes, it is profoundly silly to anyone intelligent and educated enough to understand the immense difference between the two.

It's like calling all Muslims "pagans" or "heretics" because they're not Christian.

He wrote the book of Thoth did he not? Obsessed with old Egyptian deities.


He advocated sacrificing babies, did he not?
 
He wrote the book of Thoth did he not? Obsessed with old Egyptian deities.


Yes. Not sure why you bothered bringing that up, since it has nothing to do with satanism.

He advocated sacrificing babies, did he not?


Not even remotely, no. That was a rumour created by religious nutcases to discredit him. After the rumour had been spread around by the press, he made a few jokes to that effect to further wind up the clergy and make them look like idiots. He was also fond of the attention it got him, and used it to get a lot of sex, which further annoyed the church and his detractors.
 
Last edited:
I do hope everyone on the thread makes a big effort to read Damien Echoll's book life after death. You couldnt make the title up let alone the fantastic writing. People criticise his mystical conjuring without paying heed to the overwhelming substance in his writing.
 
I'm reading it at the moment. He's certainly a strange character but I get no sense of evil from his writing.
 

Back
Top Bottom