• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Religion is to God as Sci-Fi is to Science

Limbo

Jedi Consular
Joined
Feb 29, 2008
Messages
3,077
The sci-fi/comic book genre is to science as religion is to God.

There is a secret history to the sci-fi/comic book genre and it involves the paranormal, just so with religion too. Sci-fi/comic books inspire us, and sometimes that inspiration influences science. We write sci-fi, and sci-fi writes us. Just as we wrote religion, and religion wrote us. Sci-fi/comics are our modern secular mythology. Under the surface, all the elements of religion are there.

The difference is, we don't think of Clark Kent as a historical character. We think of Clark as a mere fiction. But what if Clark is more like a kind of trojan horse? Out of it jumps a mystical metaphor... an archetype of the collective unconscious.

"Absolutely. I mean, again the phrase, “the “human as two”” is meant as sort of the balancing point because of course the history of religion, the history of these experiences were usually understood to be some kind of God or deity or transcendent world intervening in the life of the person, wherewith these modern mystics, these authors and artists, they’re usually suspicious of those kinds of religious projections. They don’t see these experiences as proving the existence of God, per se, or some Heaven or some Hell.

They see these experiences establishing that the “human as two”, not that the human being is experiencing God but that the human experience of God is actually a human experience of some other aspect of the human being. God is, if you will, a name previous cultures and eras have given to this other part of who we actually are. So this ends up effectively divinizing human beings, but not the social self or the ego, not what I call the “Clark Kent” aspect of who we are but this sort of secret self, the other side of it that peeks through very rarely but fairly consistently throughout human history. So it’s really a way of trying to humanize and bring down the divinity into human experience." -Jeffrey Kripal

http://www.amazon.com/Mutants-Mystics-Science-Superhero-Paranormal/dp/0226453839
 
Last edited:
Science fiction as myth can be a window into ourselves, and so too religion as myth. These are ways of exploring the depths of the human psyche. Science fiction is a popular way of telling a story even while exploring serious ideas. Any Trekkie can tell you that - Roddenberry loved to preach.

A sci-fi story can reach the heart, giving expression to feelings and dreams and beliefs in ways that are sometimes similar to traditional religions and sometimes in ways that traditional religions fail to do.

So as an excersise in comparative analysis, if you guys would like to suggest a sci-fi story I will pick one and decontruct it.
 
...
They see these experiences establishing that the “human as two”, not that the human being is experiencing God but that the human experience of God is actually a human experience of some other aspect of the human being. ...
.
This /\!!!
Most definitely!
 
Battlefield Earth


It's been over 20 years since I've read the book, and I didn't bother with the movie because of the bad reviews. So it's not a good choice for deconstruction.

Any other suggestions from you, or anyone else?
 
Davey
The Door Into Summer...
My sy-fy reading has really dropped off.
I used to read Analog, Asimov's and F&SF cover to cover the day they came. Now I have a stack of unopened magazines!
WTF?
 
It's been over 20 years since I've read the book, and I didn't bother with the movie because of the bad reviews. So it's not a good choice for deconstruction.

Any other suggestions from you, or anyone else?

If you're just going to arbitrarily dismiss suggestions because you don't want to (or because you're waiting for a suggestion which you can make support your conclusion), then why should anybody suggest anything?

But let's give it one more go. Battlestar Galactica. The original.
 
Glory Road - R. A. H.
The Mote in Gods Eye - Larry Niven & Jerry Pournelle
The Forever War - Joe Haldeman
The Deathworld Trilogy - Harry Harrison
Technicolor Time Machine - Harry Harrison
Inconstant Moon - Larry Niven
The Lensman Series - E. E. (Doc) Smith

Take your pick & deconstruct away. :D
 
Stranger in a Strange Land is a sci-fi classic and one of my favorites, so I am familiar enough with it to deconstruct it quickly. Then I'll move on to Battlestar Galactica.

The main character is Valentine Michael Smith, a human raised by Martians. He comes to Earth and finds himself a stranger among his own people. Smith is an example of the modern shaman of the ET mythos - he is a mana-personality and liminal figure, a perfect example of a shaman who derives his spiritual authority from his own experience, rather than from a social institution. He is set apart from his people by virtue of his experiences being raised by Martians, just as a shaman is set apart from his people by virtue of his initiatory crack-up. Martians are the modern 'tribal gods' of the modern shaman that is Smith.

Battlestar Galactica will be my next post.
 
It is shown in the book I linked to in my OP. It's a fascinating book.

I am not going to buy and read that book merely to be able to know if your first claim is true or not.

There certainly is no secret being revealed in the blurb to the book so please provide a synopsis of this "secret".
 
Sure, I'll prepare a brief synopsis right after I finish with BSG. I'm watching the pilot episode of the classic series atm.
 

Back
Top Bottom