• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Regarding Franko...

wraith said:


The next time that you take a dump Fool, you will use toilet paper to whipe your ar5e....thats Fate monfre :rolleyes:

according to you, you just happen to use your "free-will"
no no no
Why dont you use your free-will and fly an F-35...
Did your grandma have "Free-will" to connect to the net when she was 12?
:cool:

keep it up Fool, youre looking sleek
lol
I can't believe this.... Your only answer to free will is that it does not exist because you can't do what is not possible? Have you read anything I have said? I have free will to chose to do anything that is possible for me to do...I can even attempt to do what is not possible, If I chose. Why do you constantly parrot Franko's strawman that I am claiming I can chose to flap my wings and Fly? Why do you do this? Are you really that slow that you can't understand ,of is it deliberate deceit.
We have all had plenty of demonstrations of how unimportant honesty and integrity is to Logical Deism...by constantly bringing up this silly strawman you are either demonstrating your stupidity or your dishonesty...which one is it?
 
The Fool said:

I can't believe this.... Your only answer to free will is that it does not exist because you can't do what is not possible? Have you read anything I have said? I have free will to chose to do anything that is possible for me to do...I can even attempt to do what is not possible, If I chose. Why do you constantly parrot Franko's strawman that I am claiming I can chose to flap my wings and Fly? Why do you do this? Are you really that slow that you can't understand ,of is it deliberate deceit.
We have all had plenty of demonstrations of how unimportant honesty and integrity is to Logical Deism...by constantly bringing up this silly strawman you are either demonstrating your stupidity or your dishonesty...which one is it?

neither actually
;)
 
Okay, then Wraith, try using this defintion of free will

Free will = the ability to choose between perceived available options.

You see, this definition rules out things that are unavailable or impossible (like flapping your wings to fly, etc.) No believe in free will claims that it gives one the power to do the impossible.

Can you show evidence why we don't have free will as described in the definition above? Please do not change definitions. I know you can disprove your definition of free will.

The evidence for this sort of free will is easy to gather. Just see if a person is able to make a choice. The only way you can disprove this kind of free will is to show evidence that the choice was made for them. To do this, you must be able to predict the choice. Of course you can claim that the LG or TLOP or some other entity can predict, but you cannot provide any evidence of this. Thus, all available evidence points towards the existence of free will. I have evidence. You have unsupported claims. I win.
 
Tricky said:
Okay, then Wraith, try using this defintion of free will

Free will = the ability to choose between perceived available options.

You see, this definition rules out things that are unavailable or impossible (like flapping your wings to fly, etc.) No believe in free will claims that it gives one the power to do the impossible.

Can you show evidence why we don't have free will as described in the definition above? Please do not change definitions. I know you can disprove your definition of free will.

The evidence for this sort of free will is easy to gather. Just see if a person is able to make a choice. The only way you can disprove this kind of free will is to show evidence that the choice was made for them. To do this, you must be able to predict the choice. Of course you can claim that the LG or TLOP or some other entity can predict, but you cannot provide any evidence of this. Thus, all available evidence points towards the existence of free will. I have evidence. You have unsupported claims. I win.

ahhh yes.... the Trickster is back on the saddle once more
:eek:

I understand youre position and anyone elses position who claim that they still have free-will, yet cant do the impossible.

Like flapping your arms to fly...

The point is, you interpret informtaion gained through experience. Youre future actions are based on how you interpret that information. You will always "choose" the course of action with the most perceived benefit.

Whats the flaw?

Why dont you talk in french to me?
If you really want to impress your boss at a meeting, would you rock on up with thongs, singlet and a can of beer?

You perceive that you can do this....but you wont if you perceive a course of action that would lead to a more beneficial outcome.

Why is it that you messed your pants when you were a kid?
Why is it that you use the dunny now as an adult?

Is it because, as an adult, the most perceived benefit is to use the bathroom?

When you were a kid, why didnt you use "free-will" to go to the bathroom when nature called?
:cool:

Free-will is a meaningless concept...
 
wraith said:
ahhh yes.... the Trickster is back on the saddle once more
:eek:
Yes, I'm back, and badder than ever :D
wraith said:

I understand youre position and anyone elses position who claim that they still have free-will, yet cant do the impossible.

Like flapping your arms to fly...
Then do you understand that free will does not claim the impossible. it only claims that you are capable of making a choice. (Which you agree is possible, but you call it MPB). I gave you a definition of what I am calling "free will" and I asked that you debate that one, not one you made up. I see you cannot follow the simplest of directions. Have you learned to tie your shoes yet?

wraith said:

The point is, you interpret informtaion gained through experience. Youre future actions are based on how you interpret that information. You will always "choose" the course of action with the most perceived benefit.
I mostly agree with you. However, I have made very bad choices in the past, some of which, if I had been paying attention to my brain instead of my hormones, would have been much smarter. However, the point is, I made a choice. Call it MPB, or call it free will. They were choices and I made them. If you wish to claim that TLOP made them... well... evidence, please.

wraith said:
Why dont you talk in french to me?
Are you trying to flirt with me now? Sorry I usually only speak French to women I am trying to impress. However, since you have asked nicely, I will do so.

Vous avez les cerveaux d'une truite

Don't expect me to send you flowers, though.
wraith said:
If you really want to impress your boss at a meeting, would you rock on up with thongs, singlet and a can of beer?
I have no doubt that would "impress" my boss, but maybe not the way I would like. However, let me tell you a true story.

A few months ago, my company was having a "safety fair". They put people in the parking garage to keep them from breaking the rules. One of the rules was "no U-turns". Well, to get to the prime parking spaces before others do, sometimes U-turns are beneficial, and not dangerous (IMO) if you look before you turn. My boss was one of the ones in the garage noting rules violations. I drove right up to him and said I was going to make a U-turn. He said he would have to write me up. I said "fine", and I made the U-turn. This was probably not a good career move, but I did it anyway. Chalk up another win for free will.

wraith said:
You perceive that you can do this....but you wont if you perceive a course of action that would lead to a more beneficial outcome.
Sometimes I do things just for the sheer hell of it. I'll bet you know other people like this. They may logically know that it is foolish, but they do it anyway, sometimes just to thumb their nose at authority. That, my friend, is free will at it's most blatant.

wraith said:
Why is it that you messed your pants when you were a kid?
Why is it that you use the dunny now as an adult?
Seriously, wraith, you can't expect to say that because people do not use their free will to do stupid things that free will doesn't exist. I have given you a definition of free will and asked you to tell me what is wrong with that definition. I also asked you not to do so by making up a different definition (such as , "free will = doing stupid things") You have not been able to follow the simplest of instructions. Perhaps you do not have free will because you cannot say anything vaguely creative. However, you have said things that conflict with Franko, in spite of the fact that you have tried hard not to do so. Chalk up another victory for free will.

wraith said:
Is it because, as an adult, the most perceived benefit is to use the bathroom?
As I (and others, especially PixyMisa) have pointed out, this concept of MPB is really the same as free will. You choose between available, percieved options. Sure you choose the one that makes the most sense (at the time) but you still choose. That is what I am defining as free will. Nobody is choosing but you, or if they are, you have no evidence of it. Call it MPB if you like, but it is the exact same thing as free will.

wraith said:
When you were a kid, why didnt you use "free-will" to go to the bathroom when nature called?
Because it violated both the conditions of what I have defined as free will. I could not choose between available, percieved options because.
1) It was not available. I couldn't control my excretory system then. Choosing to "hold it" was not an available option.
2) I couldn't perceive it. I did not recognize the signals that said I needed to "go".

My free will has gotten much stronger since then. I even have the power to restrain myself from making insulting remarks. I hereby exercise that option right now.

Best wishes, Wraith.
 
Tricky said:
Then do you understand that free will does not claim the impossible. it only claims that you are capable of making a choice. (Which you agree is possible, but you call it MPB). I gave you a definition of what I am calling "free will" and I asked that you debate that one, not one you made up. I see you cannot follow the simplest of directions. Have you learned to tie your shoes yet?

Yes, actually :eek:
When I was 4, I didnt know how, so I needed somebody else to tie them for me. Thats the maximum perceived benefit.
If I did know how, then I would have tied them myself, since that would have been the maximum perceived benefit.
Why dont you get someone to tie your shoes now?
Why didnt I use "free-will" to tie them when I was 4?



I mostly agree with you. However, I have made very bad choices in the past, some of which, if I had been paying attention to my brain instead of my hormones, would have been much smarter. However, the point is, I made a choice. Call it MPB, or call it free will. They were choices and I made them. If you wish to claim that TLOP made them... well... evidence, please.

Whatever "choice" that you made, was at the time the maximum perceived benefit. If you knew that the "choice" would lead to a non-beneficial outcome, then you wouldnt have made that choice.


Are you trying to flirt with me now?

yes
:rolleyes:

Sorry I usually only speak French to women I am trying to impress. However, since you have asked nicely, I will do so.

It's because that you dont perceive a benefit if you spoke to me in french

Vous avez les cerveaux d'une truite

if you think so
;)


I have no doubt that would "impress" my boss, but maybe not the way I would like. However, let me tell you a true story.

A few months ago, my company was having a "safety fair". They put people in the parking garage to keep them from breaking the rules. One of the rules was "no U-turns". Well, to get to the prime parking spaces before others do, sometimes U-turns are beneficial, and not dangerous (IMO) if you look before you turn. My boss was one of the ones in the garage noting rules violations. I drove right up to him and said I was going to make a U-turn. He said he would have to write me up. I said "fine", and I made the U-turn. This was probably not a good career move, but I did it anyway. Chalk up another win for free will.

well actually, you perceived a benefit in doing so.
You wanted to rebel against authority. You wanted to stick it to your boss and get one back for the Trickster lol. It made you feel good perhaps. :rolleyes:

You could have either obeyed the rules or not. You didnt obey the rules, because that was the most perceived benefit. Like I said before, you probably wanted to be rebellious...
trying to show of to a pretty las hey?
haha

There are 100s of things that you could have "chosen" to do. But the way that you interpret your experiences, forces one real path


Sometimes I do things just for the sheer hell of it. I'll bet you know other people like this. They may logically know that it is foolish, but they do it anyway, sometimes just to thumb their nose at authority. That, my friend, is free will at it's most blatant.

read above
;)



Seriously, wraith, you can't expect to say that because people do not use their free will to do stupid things that free will doesn't exist. I have given you a definition of free will and asked you to tell me what is wrong with that definition. I also asked you not to do so by making up a different definition (such as , "free will = doing stupid things") You have not been able to follow the simplest of instructions. Perhaps you do not have free will because you cannot say anything vaguely creative. However, you have said things that conflict with Franko, in spite of the fact that you have tried hard not to do so. Chalk up another victory for free will.

LOL
actually if you tally the points up, free-will yields 0 :eek:
what are you saying? That I should sacrifice logic for "creativity"? haha RIGHT!

Even if I had said things that conflict with Franko, we both believe that free-willy is useless, Fate is rockin, consciousness creates matter and that there are consequences for your actions...
and no, it's not because of free-willy...
So you can rub off that chalk mark :rolleyes:




As I (and others, especially PixyMisa) have pointed out, this concept of MPB is really the same as free will. You choose between available, percieved options. Sure you choose the one that makes the most sense (at the time) but you still choose. That is what I am defining as free will. Nobody is choosing but you, or if they are, you have no evidence of it. Call it MPB if you like, but it is the exact same thing as free will.

It's not
because of MPB, youre choices have already been made...you walk one REAL path...

free-will cant even be defined


Because it violated both the conditions of what I have defined as free will. I could not choose between available, percieved options because.
1) It was not available. I couldn't control my excretory system then. Choosing to "hold it" was not an available option.

Because you didnt perceive a benefit to do so? That only supports what Im saying.

2) I couldn't perceive it. I did not recognize the signals that said I needed to "go".

That supports what Im saying
;)

My free will has gotten much stronger since then.

You have gotten stronger, not free-will.
Your MPB has evolved.

I even have the power to restrain myself from making insulting remarks. I hereby exercise that option right now.

Best wishes, Wraith.

Right back at ya slick :cool:
 
I've always thought if the illusion of free will and free will itself are indistinguishable, (which to me they appear to be) then it becomes a mute point. They are the same. (ie. 2=2.)

If you can not tell the difference between two species, those species are one. Hence, to me, an illusion of free will is equivelent to free will itself.

Hence no argument. (i haven't read this thread, but i couldn't resist putting forward my two cents, so i appologise id inappropriate)
 
wraith said:
When I was 4, I didnt know how, so I needed somebody else to tie them for me. Thats the maximum perceived benefit.
So MPB is free will.
If I did know how, then I would have tied them myself, since that would have been the maximum perceived benefit.
Free will again.
Why dont you get someone to tie your shoes now?
He's free to try.
Why didnt I use "free-will" to tie them when I was 4?
That's exactly what you did.
Whatever "choice" that you made, was at the time the maximum perceived benefit.
Precisely. Free will.
If you knew that the "choice" would lead to a non-beneficial outcome, then you wouldnt have made that choice.
Banana Pancakes and the Fork of Doom. Shows that when MPB makes a different prediction to free will, MPB is wrong.
well actually, you perceived a benefit in doing so.
You wanted to rebel against authority. You wanted to stick it to your boss and get one back for the Trickster. It made you feel good perhaps.
Ah! More free will!.
You could have either obeyed the rules or not. You didnt obey the rules, because that was the most perceived benefit. Like I said before, you probably wanted to be rebellious...
Free will again.
There are 100s of things that you could have "chosen" to do. But the way that you interpret your experiences, forces one real path
That one real path being free will.
That I should sacrifice logic for "creativity"?
That would not be much of a sacrafice for you.
It's not
because of MPB, youre choices have already been made...you walk one REAL path...
The path of free will.
free-will cant even be defined
Since free will has been defined explicitly right here in this thread, you have clearly failed your second grade reading classes again. You'll never graduate at this rate.
 
"Fanoir" - obscene French term for the female genetalia.

(I gotta start referring to myself as "fork of doom". That rules).
 
wraith said:

You could have either obeyed the rules or not. You didnt obey the rules, because that was the most perceived benefit.

Oh my God!. Franko is going to be very upset with you for saying this :eek:

Since when you either obey TLOP or not???

wraith said:

There are 100s of things that you could have "chosen" to do. But the way that you interpret your experiences, forces one real path

Exactly Wraith, this is what we call Free Will. It is not in contradiction with TLOP because, you choose among available and possible choices.

You think that because we don´t do stupid things or contradictory things then we don´t have free will. This is how you think FW works, but you are wrong.

It is true that the social and physical environment determines what you are and how you think, but it is because we cannot live in a vaccum. Even in those conditions and with this frame of reference, we still can make choices.

Wraith, I don´t think that we have a problem with the definition of FW, you can call it MPB and we FW. But, what we all have a problem is with your position that there is a Master Mind deciding for us, controlling our actions, when in fact, you don´t know.

What is the point of being a Police man if the Goddess, the entity you love most, has made those creatures behave as they do????
Every single action is determined by her, so a murder`s crime was his MPB. I don´t see how you can rationalise this fact.

Q-S
 
whitefork said:
"Fanoir" - obscene French term for the female genetalia.
Ah. That might explain why it wasn't in any of my "respectable" dictionaries.

Oh, and to Starshark who said:
Starshark said:


While you're on, can you tell me what fanoir means? As in, Vous etes un grand fanoir?

Eat me.:D
 
PixyMisa said:
*yeah yeah yeah*

Dont take offence because of the fact that I didnt reply to your post.

It's just that I find talking to a brick wall more interesting
;)
 
wraith said:


Dont take offence because of the fact that I didnt reply to your post.

It's just that I find talking to a brick wall more interesting
;)

I'll add "talks to brick walls" to a list of your idiosyncracies.
 
Q-Source said:


Oh my God!. Franko is going to be very upset with you for saying this :eek:

Since when you either obey TLOP or not???

lol
I was referring to the road rules that Tricky was talking about ie No U-turns

not TLOP
;)



Exactly Wraith, this is what we call Free Will. It is not in contradiction with TLOP because, you choose among available and possible choices.

You think that because we don´t do stupid things or contradictory things then we don´t have free will. This is how you think FW works, but you are wrong.

I dont actually
:)

It is true that the social and physical environment determines what you are and how you think, but it is because we cannot live in a vaccum. Even in those conditions and with this frame of reference, we still can make choices.

Your choices have already been made.
Are you going to get your boss to tie your shoes for you?
I am aware that you can do this, but you wont if you perceive a more beneficial course of action. It's just not possible.

Wraith, I don´t think that we have a problem with the definition of FW, you can call it MPB and we FW. But, what we all have a problem is with your position that there is a Master Mind deciding for us, controlling our actions, when in fact, you don´t know.

The Consciousness of God is still bound to MPB.
How many different ways can consciousness operate?
MPB does not equal free-will.

MPB implies that your choices have already been made.

Free-will seems to imply that you make "choices" from willy-nilly. It cant be defined. The definition "to choose from a range of options" doesnt cut it, because ultiimately, you end up describing MPB.

does 2 + 2 choose to equal 4?

What is the point of being a Police man if the Goddess, the entity you love most, has made those creatures behave as they do????
Every single action is determined by her, so a murder`s crime was his MPB. I don´t see how you can rationalise this fact.

ahhh excellent question
;)

The way that you act, is based on your MPB, which is a reflection of your soul/intrinsic nature...
 
It’s like getting a personal visit from God.
- wraith


Wraith Have you ever had a personal visit from God?
 

Back
Top Bottom