and you would bet your life on "claims"?
a lot of mothers did in the thalidomide era - their baby's
•••
Have a look at Vioxx history......many lost that bet
Recall you highest goal is First do no harm....most alternatives do well in that regard even if effectiveness might be weak
Pharma not well at all....
The only reason that we know that Vioxx was harmful was because we actively looked for harm. We would not have discovered it otherwise. And it was easy to have Vioxx withdrawn from the market, because you only need to be suspicious that it is harmful, you do not need to prove that it is harmful, when it comes to Big Pharma. It hasn't even been proven that Vioxx causes heart attacks, yet Merck, the FDA and MD's cautiously act on the assumption that it does.
We don't look for harm from herbal medicines, so they are potentially harming millions and we simply don't know about it. And what is worse, when we do discover that they are harmful, the manufacturers keep on selling the drugs and the ND's keep on recommending them anyways. Because for herbals, scientists have to prove the drug is harmful before they will stop making it and using it. It isn't enough that we are suspicious.
Linda
