Merged Recent climate observations disagreement with projections

Why - you find more nits to pick?? :rolleyes:

- in one thread you try and diminish a massive energy gain to 0.1% and in this you try and magnify the import of a tiny divergence from NOAA's assessment......for a single month.

pretty transparent agenda....:garfield:
 
Why - you find more nits to pick?? :rolleyes:

- in one thread you try and diminish a massive energy gain to 0.1% and in this you try and magnify the import of a tiny divergence from NOAA's assessment......for a single month.

pretty transparent agenda....:garfield:

Macdoc, have you looked at the data? Look at the data, please?

And tell we whether or not your 0.00x nitpick statement is accurate?

If you refuse to look at actual data, what am I supposed to think about your "agenda"?

C'mon, please, just look at the data.

P.S., I didn't try and diminish a massive energy gain to 0.1%; the energy gain is what it is.
 
Not really but how about the same as this year: 2010 will have a lower minimum than 2005?

I'll take that. Donations to charity of choice? You name the sum.

I'm just betting that the trend will continue upwards and any downward variations won't be enough to stop 1998 being topped. (Of course according to GISS it was already topped by 2005 but we're using HADCRUT). Here's the bet:-

We have another one for 2030. ;)

I think you might win that one.
 

Back
Top Bottom