slingblade
Unregistered
- Joined
- Jul 28, 2005
- Messages
- 23,466
Neither of the OP's linked articles mentioned how her hands were "bound." Was it with rope? Cable ties? Handcuffs? Some of those are way more plausibly self-secured than others.
Quite true. Simply hearing that someone's hands were bound doesn't tell us much of anything.
I would say that a forensic analyst could tell a great deal more about it. I'm reminded of reading Sherlock Holmes in childhood...a story in which he could deduce a visitor to the flat had no valet. The man didn't know how Holmes could tell.
Simple: the man was rather portly, and his shoelaces were tied to the near side, indicating he'd leaned around his own belly to tie the things. A valet would have centered the laces, and a man with a valet would not have tied his own shoes.
I likewise imagine that for many types of binding material, it would be easier to tell when someone had tightened the bonds themselves--if the knots (if any knots) ended up dead center, it probably wasn't them doing it. For other things, it might be impossible to say for certain, such as with handcuffs.