Re investigate 911?

[Arkan_Wolfshade]

Oh no you don't!

Dottie and I are on to your crackpot kitten theories!

 

[Hellbound]

Kittens are where demons go on vacation

 

[Kochanski]

And remember Kittens=Poptarts

http://www.goats.com/archive/980301.html

 

[Donks]

ok. so the onus is not on any particular citizen to "prove" any particular thing about 911. No one really "owns" any particular theory, all the info has grown from a point, some truths, some half truths, and some out and out lies. I have my own opinions on which is which.

For practical purposes, the onus will be on whoever makes a claim on this forum to present evidence on this forum.

The fact is it is easily proven the the "Official Story" is a lie.

This right here is a claim you are making. If you want to be believed, you'll have to provide evidence. The onus is on you. See how that works?

a] Yes, the official story is correct and all foriegn policy based on that day is right.

b] No, we have been told a pack of lies, and the wrong people have been blamed.

This right here is a false dichotomy.

 

[Soapy Sam]

Ah! I love the smell of illogic in the morning!

Arkan- That picture is a hoot! Dottie the dog detective. Why are there two huge ducks standing in the corner though?

 

[Arkan_Wolfshade]

Ah! I love the smell of illogic in the morning!

Arkan- That picture is a hoot! Dottie the dog detective. Why are there two huge ducks standing in the corner though?

One is an old leather gun case, the other is an inherited Masonic sword in its leather case. Or were you referring to my wife's feet?

 

[hellaeon]

GrahamS1, the big problem I have is that you and others will tend to ignore an expert. An expert in the case of someone who has spent years studying something such as demolitions or structural engineering and the like. This includes studying data collected for a long time worldwide. Instead you might lend credence to your own analysis of it. Im sorry but that just does not carry weight.

I say go and get books on structural engineering. Dont believe what we or the other CTers feed you.

Go read books on demolitions. Go scope the size of the operation and precision required to destroy the WTC building/s.

Go look at the maths and scope involved and realise why I put my faith in their (the people who spent years to come to the official conclusion of 911) conclusions over any assumption I could make because I am simply wrong.

We aint talking one or two people here. We are talking hundreds involved in the investigation. All concluding the same results from tests. And there would be more...imagine the people not named as part of the investigation who would have been conferred with for verification of conclusions?

You guys assume by watching a video you can conclude how an event has unfolded in roughly oh, half a minute perhaps? or maybe watching it repeatedly for a few weeks?

These guys who studied the event and provide us with data take years of constant number crunching with Maths and Physics formulas gathered from centuries of observation on how the universe is to reach conclusive numbers on every aspect possible on the event. This includes reformulating their hypothesis with new data when it would come to light.

Yet you have the nerve to call it a bluff ??

that is an immense insult to science.

There is a lot to be said for being humble.

 

[Euromutt]

Is that Alek's second shooter?

Bit tricky. The rifle the cat (well, I say "cat" but it's obviously a sniper in a kitten costume, which will allow him to leave the building unnoticed, because who would notice a six foot kitten?) is holding is an Accuracy International Arctic Warfare Super Magnum, or possibly an AI AE, which weren't developed until the 1980s.

 

[UrsulaV]

I mean, look at how cute they all. We all know that evolution is bunk and the Flying Spaghetti Monster intelligently designed everything so that cute things were nice and soft and cuddly, not cold bludded killers.

You, my friend, have obviously never been mauled by a koala.

 

[rwguinn]

Bit tricky. The rifle the cat (well, I say "cat" but it's obviously a sniper in a kitten costume, which will allow him to leave the building unnoticed, because who would notice a six foot kitten?) is holding is an Accuracy International Arctic Warfare Super Magnum, or possibly an AI AE, which weren't developed until the 1980s.

Pre-production prototypes?

 

[GrnMtSkeptic]

Pre-production prototypes?

Much better hypothesis than the one I was forming that involved time machines, a bottle of hot sauce, and a Ford Pinto.

 

[gruk]

You, my friend, have obviously never been mauled by a koala.

They're the ones that are (sort of) like drop bears, aren't they? Only cuter and cuddlier.

 

[senorpogo]

What a pile on!

Graham S1's post = 1962 Mets

 

[Jimbo07]

Euormutt, I think the designs for a great world-domination device can be found in...

"Electronics for Dogs"

 

[RSLancastr]

ok. so the onus is not on any particular citizen to "prove" any particular thing about 911.

What's to prove?

You call the number, they answer.

 

[Regnad Kcin]

ok. so the onus is not on any particular citizen to "prove" any particular thing about 911...

I can "prove" that they tend to be smokin' hot:

 

[Ladewig]

[qimg]http://taint.org/xfer/2004/kittens.jpg[/qimg]

It's like a kitteny Hydra.

The fact is it is easily proven the the "Official Story" is a lie. And that a proper, public enquiry needs to be done, instead of a forced comission, on a limited budget, with limited evidence.

Can you give some evidence? If not, can you give an example of one of the greater lies in this pack of lies?

 

[Graham S1]

hmm, maybe the poll should have been, whose actually read the 911 Comission Report.

 

[kookbreaker]

hmm, maybe the poll should have been, whose actually read the 911 Comission Report.

Maybe the poll should have made a lick of sense and not force a false dichotomy on its voters.

 

[Belz...]

The fact is it is easily proven the the "Official Story" is a lie.

Then why are you doing this poll ?

a] Yes, the official story is correct and all foriegn policy based on that day is right.

b] No, we have been told a pack of lies, and the wrong people have been blamed.

Welcome to the wonderful world of false dichotomies.