Rashard Mendenhall: 9/11 Truther

The minute the NFL lockout is done, you can bet the Steelers will try to unload Mendenhall on any team desperate enough to want him,although the fan reaction to any team bringing him on board means the Steelers might be stuck with him unless they out and out fire him.

If they didn't trade Roethlisberger when he was facing rape accusations and riding a motorcycle without a helmet, they wouldn't have much precedent for trying to trade Mendenhall for saying something stupid.
Hell, if stupidity was the threshold, they should've dealt James Harrison years ago.
 
Pittsburgher and Steeler fan here.


What a moron. I'd be fine if they ditch him. He's good but not a spectacular player. He is apparently a spectacular idiot.
 
The NFL is a business not a live by your morals and teach all that is right orginization. They would be crazy to cut a player just because he has radial views. The post above about the Ben Roth situation is a perfect example.

Bottom Line Business = Super Bowls = Keep all the talent have it may not come again for a long while.
 
But there is a precedent, specifically with the Steelers. They released Santonio Holmes, a Superbowl MVP, for tweeting that he "Waked and baked".
 
I might be one to call in and defend him, if calling sports radio talk shows were something I ever did. Basically, on freedom of speech and what-does-this-have-to-do-with-football grounds.

On the other hand, if he starts deliberately fumbling the ball to symbolically demonstrate his solidarity with the Truth Movement, then the team should fire him.

Respectfully,
Myriad
 
I might be one to call in and defend him, if calling sports radio talk shows were something I ever did. Basically, on freedom of speech and what-does-this-have-to-do-with-football grounds.

Freedom of speech doesn't enter the picture. He has the right to say a lot of things that damage the Steelers' business. The Steelers can then cut him, because what he does not have is the right to play for them.
 
The NFL is a business not a live by your morals and teach all that is right orginization. They would be crazy to cut a player just because he has radial views. The post above about the Ben Roth situation is a perfect example.

Bottom Line Business = Super Bowls = Keep all the talent have it may not come again for a long while.


Aflac is also a business and they ditched Gilbert Godfrey. You can argue that that was an over-reaction—and I'd agree—but businesses are constantly letting people go for inappropriate comments. I once got a man fired for derogatory and racial comments. My point is that "X is a business" is not a valid excuse for why X won't fire one of their employees.
 
Last edited:
Aflac is also a business and they ditched Gilbert Godfrey. You can argue that that was an over-reaction—and I'd agree—but businesses are constantly letting people go for inappropriate comments. I once got a man fired for derogatory and racial comments. My point is that "X is a business" is not a valid excuse for why X won't fire one of their employees.

Point taken. But I don't think Gilbert Godfrey is as crucial to Afflac's success as a starting running back is to an NFL team... but then again that's only my opinion :)
 
Point taken. But I don't think Gilbert Godfrey is as crucial to Afflac's success as a starting running back is to an NFL team... but then again that's only my opinion :)

*Gottfried.

And it doesn't matter, because the NFL has its own rules, both codified and unwritten, for how to handle controversial players. None of those rules set a precedent for cutting or trading a player simply for making a stupid and/or controversial public statement that poses no risk of impacting the team's bottom line or compromising the integrity of the game.
All major pro sports leagues routinely punish players for making statements in public that impugn league officials; teams have the right to punish players for causing conflicts within the organization. But no league or team-sanctioned punishment has ever been handed down for making controversial statements that bore no relevance to league or team business.
If the Steelers punish Mendenhall for this, it sets a very risky precedent. It starts at outlandish and morally questionable tweets that paint the player himself in a bad light and offend large swaths of the population... but what comes after that? Will players be subject to punishment for making political statements that clash with the views of management?
A number of Green Bay Packers showed solidarity with public sector employees in Wisconsin who were protesting the union-stripping bill there. The Packers are unique in that they're publicly-owned, but the majority of NFL owners are slightly to the right of Augusto Pinochet politically, so if these were any other team's players, odds are that they would've ruffled the feathers of the man signing their paychecks by their actions.
And let's not forget that even though it's currently decertified on account of the lockout, the NFL has a very powerful players union that would fight tooth and nail against any sort of player 'speech codes' being put in place. The last thing the league wants right now is to add fuel to the fire of the ongoing labor strife.

As I said before, if the threshold was simply saying something boneheaded to the press [or in tweets], the Steelers would've parted ways with James Harrison [who, despite his accolades, is every bit as expendable as Mendenhall because of the style of defense the Steelers play] over a year ago. He made statements that not only reflected badly on him, but also risked reprisals from other teams against his teammates for his head-hunting style of play, which he refused to back down from.
 
Big Ben was the lynchpin of the team, and would not be easy to replace, they can replace Mendenhall. He is a good but not exceptional player.

I was talking about Santonio Holmes and his multiple arrests for drugs, domestic violence and assault.
 
Notice that this truther is also the only NFL player to publicly condemn the flamboyant celebration of death.
 
"What kind of person celebrates death? It's amazing how people can HATE a man they have never even heard speak. We've only heard one side ..."

"We love death. The U.S. loves life. That is the big difference between us." -- Osama Bin Laden

“Three months after our blessed attack against the main infidel West, especially America, and two months after the infidel's attacks on Islam, we would like to talk about some of the implications of those incidents”

Yes, because we can always count on those "Terrorist-to-English" translations 100%.
 
Notice that this truther is also the only NFL player to publicly condemn the flamboyant celebration of death.

The belief that OBL's death, either at the hands of the U.S. Military or in its custody was anything other than an inevitability is baffling to me. Does anyone seriously think that OBL would allow himself to be captured alive?

Do you not feel a sense of satisfaction when you finally manage to crush the mosquito that's been flying around your room? How about if that mosquito is one you know infected several thousand people with malaria?
 
Yes, because we can always count on those "Terrorist-to-English" translations 100%.

Arabic-to-English dictionaries aren't exactly a rare commodity. If you question the validity of the translations we've been provided, you're free to study up and put forth one of your own.
 
Arabic-to-English dictionaries aren't exactly a rare commodity. If you question the validity of the translations we've been provided, you're free to study up and put forth one of your own.

That would mean a truther becoming educated in something. Good luck with that.
 
Arabic-to-English dictionaries aren't exactly a rare commodity. If you question the validity of the translations we've been provided, you're free to study up and put forth one of your own.

You can't prove the validity of the quote. The burden isn't on me to properly translate that which you've posted. Languages also don't translate directly, particularly if they are so far removed from one another.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom