I feel like there's a communication barrier here.
I understand that Abbott ordered the rainbow colors on the crosswalk removed. That's not something I'm challenging.
What I'm questioning is whether Abbott ordered that these particular crosswalks at this particular intersection be removed by digging up several inches of asphalt and resurfacing the entire intersection.
My current suspicion is that this intersection was slated for resurfacing irrespective of Abbott's particular view on optical spectra, and that protesters showing up in the middle of the night to disrupt cold planing was performative. In other words, protesters picked this particular crosswalk to protest at, because it guarantees that they'll 'lose' their protest - because the road is being dug the ◊◊◊◊ up regardless of what color the crosswalk is. And that gives the protestors a 'sympathy vote' when they're pushed back from the area so that normal work can happen.
I don't give a crap about what color crosswalks are, so long as they're visible and don't mess up the service dogs trying to get blind people to the other side safely.
But I am also well aware of how manipulative a whole lot of news and social media is these days, and how very selective a lot of activism can be in order to support their narrative.