Shashi thinks for Tipu, the tiger now belonging to his hated rivals is the ultimate humiliation.
“A statue that had been prepared essentially for him to actually demonstrate his contempt for the British to actually be in British hands. He would have been pretty, pretty, pretty upset about that.”
Historian Zareer Masani isn’t so sure.
“I think Tipu would be quite pleased because he was a very vain man, and [would like] the idea that the whole world was learning about him, which is something that happens via an object like the tiger.”
He says there is no tradition of museums in India, before colonial times.
“The reason it survived is that it was shipped off to England and conserved and preserved. Had it been in India would have just fallen to pieces eventually because no-one would have been interested for a couple of hundred years.”
While the V&A tells the ABC that there has not been an official request for repatriation, Shashi wants the tiger back.
“There’s something wrong about stealing items that belong to another people and then, self righteously claiming you look after them better than those who are entitled to own them would,” he says.
“I mean, if someone literally dug your father’s grave up and put it on display in his backyard, would you feel that morality was on his side? It’s that kind of story you’re talking about.”