This is a reference to Ben Goldacre, who responded to Kumar's participation in his "Bad Science" blog withinstead much childish and ridiculing interference alike "child crying in same room where dynamic speeches were given" (said somewhat alike it at other place as remarks on me)
Maybe a vote of thanks to Dr. Goldacre is in order!Kumar, here and elsewhere, I simply cannot understand most of what you say, it’s getting to be a bit like having an interesting conversation with a screaming child in the same room.
Do go away.
Let me complete it and END;
.........
Father: you are young, but not behave alike that. I am very much fed up, so go to hell or any other place of your choice.
Son; (just weeping and repenting).
The End.
Father/parents, "O" negative blood group people, people with good emotions & helping hand, people who respect-- their culture, nature, spirituals, ancien'ts and ancestor’s sayings or other good things (so considered since ages), should be having only helping hand, giving to all and sharing just with the similar ones, but not the taking or beggings. Therefore continued to my best, instead much childish and ridiculing interference alike "child crying in same room where dynamic speeches were given" (said somewhat alike it at other place as remarks on me) which I just ignored/tolerated. My grammar in any subject or understandings of some languages of some modern subjects would had been poor, but meanings, dynamisms, logics, naturalities were much stronger which people may understand at some suitable entitled time in nature. So just remember those which create some thought provokations in your inherited/natural/innate/evolved brain or logics and make others next ones, to remember which may be helpful.
My duties are over. Let now nature takes it own recourse.
Sorry for the mistakes in grammar & languages and thank for everything. Nothing to "blame or claim" myself or yourself as everything can happen as per "nature's system and balance or as per God’s wish--as our ancient ones or our ancestors had indicated......
"Your choice/your pro-systems/your luck would prevail and be preferred till nature in balanced up to some extent....as indicated/shown by "variations in "maintaining god" on variations in ages/yugas"
Best wishes/regards/luck accordingly. DOtry changing emotions unabling body cells to learn trust and to act beneficially.
GOOD BYE TILL NEXT SUITABLE TIME.
*snip*
Rolfe.
Oops, I forgot. Now, if I sneak Rickmansworth in here, before BSM's next move, that reconfigures the western half of the board in my favour....
! Good thing I opted for the "far east"
.He's now over on both H'pathy and OtherHealth, wittering on about how homoeopathy is such a good system and of course the Bristol study was so good because the patients weren't on any orthodox medicine, and all the negative results from controlled studies are caused by all the other drugs the patients were getting at the same time.
He also wants to know why people (like us) can't be prevented from criticising homoeopathy, because it is such a well-regarded system and legal in so many countries and so on.
http://www.hpathy.com/homeopathyforums/forum_posts.asp?TID=3671&PN=1
If you can't win the argument, try to get your opposition silenced, I suppose!
Rolfe.
I wonder if he got that idea from reading your thread on Hoare.He also wants to know why people (like us) can't be prevented from criticising homoeopathy, because it is such a well-regarded system and legal in so many countries and so on.
I think he got the idea from these guys, who seem to think that homoeopathy is an entity capable of suing for defamation. He's linked to this page here, and linked to their homepage in the second post on the thread Rolfe linked to.I wonder if he got that idea from reading your thread on Hoare.
I think he got the idea from these guys, who seem to think that homoeopathy is an entity capable of suing for defamation. He's linked to this page here, and linked to their homepage in the second post on the thread Rolfe linked to.
I had missed the Randi page. Global action! Does James Randi know about this threat? I love the comparison with a condor and a horse. Condors, of course, are very large vultures.I think he got the idea from these guys,
Somebody made a 3x preparation of it.Wow when did the challenge prize reach a billion ('merican)!?
"one thousand million U.S. dollars".
I don't think he read that thread. He seems to butt in on every thread he reads, and I'd have been surprised if he'd restrained himself on that one.I wonder if he got that idea from reading your thread on Hoare.
He's now over on both H'pathy and OtherHealth, wittering on about how homoeopathy is such a good system and of course the Bristol study was so good because the patients weren't on any orthodox medicine, and all the negative results from controlled studies are caused by all the other drugs the patients were getting at the same time.
He also wants to know why people (like us) can't be prevented from criticising homoeopathy, because it is such a well-regarded system and legal in so many countries and so on.
http://www.hpathy.com/homeopathyforums/forum_posts.asp?TID=3671&PN=1
If you can't win the argument, try to get your opposition silenced, I suppose!
Rolfe.
It is a bit nauseating to consider just how much time was wasted on him.
And "different".OTOH, we did teach him how to spell "modern".
Hope this will help to you to understand realities.