Any suggestion that homosexuality is due to some kind of population control is sort of begging the question: if population size is the factor then why aren't overpopulated countries like India and China more likely to have homosexuals than underpopulated ones? There's no evidence that overpopulated areas have more homosexuals.
It also leads to the truth that if homosexuality is some kind of population control mechanism is sure as hell isn't working because some places have no room left and the people go hungry by the millions.
I'd like to put forward the idea that if a culture does not condemn a homosexual lifestyle then those who are even only moderately attracted to their own sex -- are far more tempted to live the lifestyle. No man in a Mid Eastern culture - which all condemns gays - would be stupid enough to live with another man.
Despite what gay activists assert the fact a culture is more tolerant does encourage the continuance of homosexual expressions.
It also leads to the truth that if homosexuality is some kind of population control mechanism is sure as hell isn't working because some places have no room left and the people go hungry by the millions.
I'd like to put forward the idea that if a culture does not condemn a homosexual lifestyle then those who are even only moderately attracted to their own sex -- are far more tempted to live the lifestyle. No man in a Mid Eastern culture - which all condemns gays - would be stupid enough to live with another man.
Despite what gay activists assert the fact a culture is more tolerant does encourage the continuance of homosexual expressions.
Last edited: