Merged Questionman's questions about Obama

Notice how Obama wants to federalize the cops and override the fully constitutional concept of local policing...

...but at the same time, he's quite willing to let cities set their own immigration laws, something that by the Constitution is only a power for the federal congress.

Obama = Constitution Shredder = High Crimes = Repeated POTUS Oath Violator = Traitor = Should Be Impeached But US Is Already Under Totalitarian Leftist Control

Obama's the biggest racist bitch of them all..........
Obama has trashed the cops all his life. It was an eye opener and should have been for all of us, in the Cambridge Police case with Prof. Gates. He and his wife and all his administration are all on the same foot.

He is to blame for the riots, from Ferguson and beyond, he is one evil man.

http://www.ammoland.com/2016/07/pre...flames-racism-police-shootings/#axzz4Dl6KpJhT

:dl:

Ammoland??
 
To be fair, that was a pretty epic run-on sentence, and a pretty poorly constructed one at that.

But, yeah, I'm the problem.
 
To be fair, that was a pretty epic run-on sentence, and a pretty poorly constructed one at that.

But, yeah, I'm the problem.

Sorry using Talk to type,, and half blind this morning from a lighting strike right in front of me.
Everything is dim green still. Do you need some rain would like to email someone else this flood.
 
Notice how Obama wants to federalize the cops and override the fully constitutional concept of local policing...

...but at the same time, he's quite willing to let cities set their own immigration laws, something that by the Constitution is only a power for the federal congress.

Obama = Constitution Shredder = High Crimes = Repeated POTUS Oath Violator = Traitor = Should Be Impeached But US Is Already Under Totalitarian Leftist Control

Obama's the biggest racist bitch of them all..........
Obama has trashed the cops all his life. It was an eye opener and should have been for all of us, in the Cambridge Police case with Prof. Gates. He and his wife and all his administration are all on the same foot.

He is to blame for the riots, from Ferguson and beyond, he is one evil man.

http://www.ammoland.com/2016/07/pre...flames-racism-police-shootings/#axzz4Dl6KpJhT

This posting reminds me of a little something that a famous bunny rabbit was once fond of saying:

"I am Elmer J. Fudd, millionaire.

I own a mansion and a yacht."

:bunpan
 
If when one human's blood is spilled needlessly should not all humanity bleed and ask for justice, for the inhuman act of taking a life, or should we just be a stupid as* and post stupid stuff on the Internet in an attempt to look even stupider than the moron who wrote the story, in the first place?

I believe that was his actual question.


Should have know not to post something thoughtful on the political forum, I am going back to the more intelligent, 9/11 conspiracy theories forum.
This is why I don't leave it that much.

To be fair, that was a pretty epic run-on sentence, and a pretty poorly constructed one at that.

But, yeah, I'm the problem.

Sorry using Talk to type,, and half blind this morning from a lighting strike right in front of me.
Everything is dim green still. Do you need some rain would like to email someone else this flood.


Wow, get well soon! Here, let me see if I can help.

Tyr rewording Crazy Chainsaw said:
If and when one human's blood is spilled needlessly, should not all humanity bleed and ask for justice for this inhuman act of taking a life? Or should we just be a stupid ass (don't hide 'profanity', type it all out and let the auto-censor do it's job) and post stupid stuff on the Internet in an attempt to look even more stupid than the moron who wrote the story in the first place?

Basically, I think Crazy Chainsaw is mocking the CT nonsense of the OP while also mocking the idea that posting it in any way is useful to addressing bloodshed.
 
Wow, get well soon! Here, let me see if I can help.



Basically, I think Crazy Chainsaw is mocking the CT nonsense of the OP while also mocking the idea that posting it in any way is useful to addressing bloodshed.

But once Obama gets better accuracy with that weaponized lightning thingy any number of posters here will be zapped out of this plane. :boxedin:
 
Notice how Obama wants to federalize the cops and override the fully constitutional concept of local policing...

Factually incorrect.

...but at the same time, he's quite willing to let cities set their own immigration laws, something that by the Constitution is only a power for the federal congress.

Factually incorrect, but arguable if one believes he hasn't done enough to address this. This criticism could be leveled at just about anyone in the Federal government for the last decade.

Obama = Constitution Shredder = High Crimes = Repeated POTUS Oath Violator = Traitor = Should Be Impeached But US Is Already Under Totalitarian Leftist Control

Utter nonsense and wrong at every step, aside from traitors should be impeached. Obama has not: shredded the Constitution, committed any high crimes, violated an oath, is a traitor, should be impeached, and the US isn't under leftist control, totalitarian or otherwise. Furthermore, not all high crimes are treason.

Obama's the biggest racist bitch of them all..........

Hahahaha. You right wingers sure have weird persecution complexes.

Obama has trashed the cops all his life.

No.

It was an eye opener and should have been for all of us, in the Cambridge Police case with Prof. Gates. He and his wife and all his administration are all on the same foot.


The one where they all, including the cop, ended up having a beer together? What? Yeah, really hates cops doesn't he?

He is to blame for the riots, from Ferguson and beyond, he is one evil man.


No. People like you are. You refuse to address legitimate problems and instead blame the 'leftists'. The riots aren't simple.


Your argument is simply invalid. I hope one of the more articulate right wingers around here pick up your argument and try it again, because it's going to be more useful picking it apart from them.
 
And once again, another tragedy, another speech from Obama where he doesn't mention Muslims, terrorists, or ISIL.
 
tyr_13, why did you even bother?

Because I fully predict some of the more articulate conservative, I'm sorry, right-wing, posters on these boards to make variations (less strong mainly) on these points. I am hoping that some of them take the time to agree with what I said, rather than hide behind 'we didn't say anything because a nut said it'.

I've noticed that when someone like myself makes a claim about what a right-wing argument is, the more reasonable and articulate right-wingers will call it out as a 'straw man' or 'no true conservative', while staying silent when people like the OP say anything. If I echo something like the OP as being right-wing points or positions, I'm curious to see what happens.
 
The author of the Ammoland piece raised this point:


He (Obama) did not ask people to feel what it might be like to be one of Lavoy Finicum ‘s family.


Hmmmm...

Relieved that those "Say goodbye to Uncle Lavoy" hugs which all too often felt icky were at an end.
Sad because the voice of reason in the contentious Earnhardt vs Petty debates was forever silenced.
Excited because, 'Damn cuz', we famous now. We gonna get all the poontang at the next militia BBQ/turkey shoot/ gun show.'
 
Because I fully predict some of the more articulate conservative, I'm sorry, right-wing, posters on these boards to make variations (less strong mainly) on these points. I am hoping that some of them take the time to agree with what I said, rather than hide behind 'we didn't say anything because a nut said it'.

I've noticed that when someone like myself makes a claim about what a right-wing argument is, the more reasonable and articulate right-wingers will call it out as a 'straw man' or 'no true conservative', while staying silent when people like the OP say anything. If I echo something like the OP as being right-wing points or positions, I'm curious to see what happens.

Ya, but the dude is just copy pasta-ing from his blog (or someone's blog). I'm not disagreeing or a moral or philosophical level.
 
Factually incorrect.



Factually incorrect, but arguable if one believes he hasn't done enough to address this. This criticism could be leveled at just about anyone in the Federal government for the last decade.



Utter nonsense and wrong at every step, aside from traitors should be impeached. Obama has not: shredded the Constitution, committed any high crimes, violated an oath, is a traitor, should be impeached, and the US isn't under leftist control, totalitarian or otherwise. Furthermore, not all high crimes are treason.



Hahahaha. You right wingers sure have weird persecution complexes.



No.




The one where they all, including the cop, ended up having a beer together? What? Yeah, really hates cops doesn't he?




No. People like you are. You refuse to address legitimate problems and instead blame the 'leftists'. The riots aren't simple.



Your argument is simply invalid. I hope one of the more articulate right wingers around here pick up your argument and try it again, because it's going to be more useful picking it apart from them.

This.
 
Why? Were they responsible? :rolleyes:

Does it matter?

I may have gotten my talking points out of order. Maybe this is the one where Obama blames videos posted on the Internet and a spontaneous expression of ire from the general public.

I'll have to see how Ann Coulter is spinning it.
 
Finger wagging about alleged police abuses is basically excusing the inexcusable crimes we've seen over the last 18-24 hours.

No matter what perceived grievances a particular party or faction might have, these ambushes, assaults, and murders of police are 100% intolerable.

THAT should have been the President's message, not victim shaming.
 

Back
Top Bottom