Ricardo
Unregistered
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2019
- Messages
- 484
Analysis of 30 site arguments http://www.debunkingskeptics.com/Contents.htm
Argument # 1: It is irrational to believe anything that hasn't been proven.
This is the main philosophy behind most skeptical arguments. As Dr. Melvin Morse, Seattle pediatrician and author specializing in child Near Death Experiences said:
“The notion that 'It is rational to only believe what's been proven' somehow got twisted into ‘It is irrational to believe in anything that hasn't been proven’.” (Interview from video: Conversations with God)
By "proven" skeptics mean proven according to the scientific method, which they consider to be the only reliable method. There are several problems with this argument:
<snip>
Edited by Loss Leader:
Quotes added to identify this as the writings of another. Lengthy quote snipped for Rule 4. Do not quote lengthy tracts available elsewhere on the web or otherwise subject to copyright.
Last edited by a moderator:
