Question for the twoofers about why NIST is wrong

Well, my assumptions were completely correct on the responses I would get in this thread from CTs. No scientific information, no calculations, no evidence, and nothing to disprove the NIST report which they think is so completely flawed. Conclusions:
CTs cannot disprove the NIST report. Maybe in woowoo land they can, but in the real world they don't stand a chance. (Yes that conclusion was reached a LONG time before this thread was started but I like to emphasize stupidity.):)
 
(Yes that conclusion was reached a LONG time before this thread was started but I like to emphasize stupidity.):)
Click to expand...
personally im always re-evaluating my previous conclusions

conversely, CTers are always reaffirming my previous conclusions
 
I view the thread rather differently.

Not one skeptic could explain total collapse.

One skeptic was actually debunked by NIST lol

One skeptic cited a report on the logistics of going to ground zero as a peer reviewed paper that supported the NIST report. Proves you don't read what you link to and just rely on other people to debunk
 
One skeptic cited a report on the logistics of going to ground zero as a peer reviewed paper that supported the NIST report. Proves you don't read what you link to and just rely on other people to debunk
Click to expand...
if you liked that one go read any link posted by 28th kingdom, lol
 
Wizard said:
I view the thread rather differently.

Not one skeptic could explain total collapse.

One skeptic was actually debunked by NIST lol

One skeptic cited a report on the logistics of going to ground zero as a peer reviewed paper that supported the NIST report. Proves you don't read what you link to and just rely on other people to debunk
Click to expand...

Has anyone explored the possibilty that the collapse of the WTC towers was precipitated by destablizing the structural support for the 180,000 gallon water towers, which in turn initiated the dynamic floor to floor pancaking?
 
Wizard said:
I gave up on the 28th kingdom thread when idiots just started posting pictures of cats
Click to expand...
I've been posting her since March, and I have rarely, if ever, seen a kitty picture or recipe posted prematurely. There is more wisdom behind the cat pics than you know, Wizard.
 
Crungy said:
Has anyone explored the possibilty that the collapse of the WTC towers was precipitated by destablizing the structural support for the 180,000 gallon water towers, which in turn initiated the dynamic floor to floor pancaking?
Click to expand...

If you believe there are 180000 gallon water tanks in the wtc then you are far more foolish than I thought. Theres a thread about it somewhere, it has been thoroughly debunked
 
Crungy said:
Has anyone explored the possibilty that the collapse of the WTC towers was precipitated by destablizing the structural support for the 180,000 gallon water towers, which in turn initiated the dynamic floor to floor pancaking?
Click to expand...
On the outside chance that Judy Wood or Morgan Reynolds may be reading this, you shouldn't post things like that.
 
Gravy said:
I've been posting her since March, and I have rarely, if ever, seen a kitty picture or recipe posted prematurely. There is more wisdom behind the cat pics than you know, Wizard.
Click to expand...

Well..don't leave me in suspense
 
Gravy said:
On the outside chance that Judy Wood or Morgan Reynolds may be reading this, you shouldn't post things like that.
Click to expand...


Judy Wood? Is that the professor of engineering who believes the towers couldn't have collapsed naturally?

Thankyou gravy for further debunking the notion that no engineers agree with the CT
 
Wizard said:
If you believe there are 180000 gallon water tanks in the wtc then you are far more foolish than I thought. Theres a thread about it somewhere, it has been thoroughly debunked
Click to expand...
If that's a joke, it's funny. If it isn't a joke, then I take back all the nice things I ever said about you.

Wizard said:
There were huge water tanks at the top. I'm sure I heard each tower had 180,000 gallons.

It's surprising that there was still fires after the collapse. The burning debris fell 80 stories and all that water fell on it
Click to expand...
 
Gravy said:
On the outside chance that Judy Wood or Morgan Reynolds may be reading this, you shouldn't post things like that.
Click to expand...

Now I'm not saying that this is how it happened, but.......would it be possible that the star wars beam struck with great precision the support beams for the fire protection water hold tank?
 
Wizard said:
Judy Wood? Is that the professor of engineering who believes the towers couldn't have collapsed naturally?

Thankyou gravy for further debunking the notion that no engineers agree with the CT
Click to expand...
She is a former professor of mechanical engineering who specialized in dental work. She doesn't know the difference between an elastic and an inelastic collision, which may be why she is no longer employed.

Judy Wood believes that "High energy beam weapons" may have been used to destroy the Twin Towers. Do you still support her, Wizard?

And do you think that this slide from her presentation is an accurate representation of the construction of the towers and the physics behind their collapse?

8790453dbf9d25888.jpg


Just asking questions and demanding answers.
​
 
Wizard said:
Judy Wood? Is that the professor of engineering who believes the towers couldn't have collapsed naturally?

Thankyou gravy for further debunking the notion that no engineers agree with the CT
Click to expand...
Professors of Totally Unrelated Fields have gleefully agreed with, and in fact have fueled, the CTs and CTism of 9/11. People like Wood (Dentistry), Jones (Fusion), Griffin (Theology) and even other Real Smart Folks who don't have the brains God gave a gently stewed stalk of rhubarb when it comes to the areas of controlled demolition and structural engineering.

Can the cats be too far behind?
 
Crungy said:
Now I'm not saying that this is how it happened, but.......would it be possible that the star wars beam struck with great precision the support beams for the fire protection water hold tank?
Click to expand...
I'm pretty sure that the lead-lined concrete core would have prevented that, although I suppose the energy beam could have set off the C4-coated rebar in the core.
 
Gravy said:
She is a former professor of mechanical engineering who specialized in dental work. She doesn't know the difference between an elastic and an inelastic collision, which may be why she is no longer employed.

Judy Wood believes that "High energy beam weapons" may have been used to destroy the Twin Towers. Do you still support her, Wizard?

And do you think that this slide from her presentation is an accurate representation of the construction of the towers and the physics behind their collapse?


Just asking questions and demanding answers.​
Click to expand...


I think it is more accurate than the jenga garbage that a skeptic posted earlier in this thread.

If she doesn't know the difference between collision types how did she get various degrees in engineering and a Ph.D?

What's the source for your claim she was into dental work?
 
ConspiRaider said:
Professors of Totally Unrelated Fields have gleefully agreed with, and in fact have fueled, the CTs and CTism of 9/11. People like Wood (Dentistry), Jones (Fusion), Griffin (Theology) and even other Real Smart Folks who don't have the brains God gave a gently stewed stalk of rhubarb when it comes to the areas of controlled demolition and structural engineering.

Can the cats be too far behind?
Click to expand...
A minor quibble: mechanical engineering is certainly related to structural engineering. In the past we've made the mistake of casting aspersions on the whole profession of mechanical engineering because a couple of kooky engineers couldn't, or wouldn't, remember the material in physics 101. Judy Wood is simply gonzo. That shouldn't reflect on mechanical engineers any more than Morgan Reynolds' behavior should reflect on economists.

Okay, scratch that last part.
 
Gravy said:
I'm pretty sure that the lead-lined concrete core would have prevented that, although I suppose the energy beam could have set off the C4-coated rebar in the core.
Click to expand...

But couldn't they have exploited a microcrack in the concrete core? I'm thinking along the lines of the finale to Star Wars when the Luke finds the one weak spot in the death star and scores the money shot to blow it to kingdom come........So many dead contractors...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom