Question for Ryan Mackey

Tony Szamboti said:
They were in the as designed documentation, and any change would have had to occur during construction, so your point here is biased without a basis.
Click to expand...


Would you care to post the original "as designed documentation" that you have that allows you to assert this?

You're not suggesting, I hope, that the drawings shown in the Salvarinas paper are original WTC7 "as designed documentation"?


tom
 
dafydd said:
What? Phrase that again in English please.
Click to expand...

I think he means "It did not", i.e. the nose of flight 175 didn't really exit the tower, but some debris did, and some people think it was the nose of flight 175. Ace Baker, in particular, will forever be convinced that ...

No, I won't go down that particular rabbit hole again. Suffice it to say, the rabbits don't come out to go to the toilet, so you can guess what it's full of.

Dave
 
Oystein said:
The fact that it hasn't ended up in court yet, and that no one is even attempting to get it in court, is very telling.
Where are Richard Gage's procedings? Why had Steven Jones not filed legal
complaints?
The only party I am aware of that at least employs a lawyer to do some legal paperwork is the whacko club of Judy Wood. We know the train wreck trail that attorney Jerry Leaphard has created at JREF alone.
Click to expand...
It has been in court, many times. LashL has a whole slew of court documents. It never goes well for the "truth" side.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom