"Quagmire" morphs into "A Very Sucessful Effort"

Actually, I do know, at least much more often than not. Do I deem it important to explain what to me is obvious to you because you don't understand it? Very very seldom.

Thanks for playing, though. Happy now?

Oh great and powerful hammegk, shine you light down on us. We beseech you to enlighten us with your clearly superior understanding. We are aware that our limited understanding ill equips us to imbibe the wisdom of your remarks.

Translation: Cards on the table now, hammegk.
 
ImaginalDisc: Yesterday you asked, "hammegk, what on the bloody blue Earth are you talking about?" My bad for not getting back to you then. The answer, as best I can tell, is that no one knows what on the bloody blue earth hammegk is talking about, including hammegk. You'll live longer and post happier in possession of that little tidbit of knowledge.

Cheers! :)

Manny, we finally found something we can agree upon.



Woah!
 
Last edited:
Oh great and powerful hammegk, shine you light down on us. We beseech you to enlighten us with your clearly superior understanding. We are aware that our limited understanding ill equips us to imbibe the wisdom of your remarks.

Translation: Cards on the table now, hammegk.
Feed not ye trolls. If thou worry that hammegk will go unchalleneged and listened to by the credulous, fear not: even newbies soon learn to put him on Ignore. Ye.
 
Feed not ye trolls. If thou worry that hammegk will go unchalleneged and listened to by the credulous, fear not: even newbies soon learn to put him on Ignore. Ye.
After having read some of the bs you post, the wise should conclude to accord you the same treatment.
 
Yet another thread diverted from original topic to a look what an idiot hammy is thread. hammy you have amazing powers of persuasion.
 
Would you prefer to address the point that the Republicans have deliberatly shut the Democrats out of the political process, our would you prefer to belittle the Democrats more?

Well, to be "part of the political process", you need to win elections.
 
No, Skeptic. You see, it's important to reach out even to those who cannot win elections. It doesn't matter if they cannot generate support among their fellow citizens. That is not the point! The point is to always know better than the people who cast votes. Only then can you be considered truly "democratic."

But here's the really important part: If, by some chance, your party manages to retake the majority, none of this matters.
 
Would you prefer to address the point that the Republicans have deliberatly shut the Democrats out of the political process, our would you prefer to belittle the Democrats more?

Well, to be "part of the political process", you need to win elections.

There are 55 Republican Senators. There are 45 Non-Republican Senators;44 Dem, I Indie.

There are 231 Republican Congresspeople, and 203 Non-Reps; 202 Dems, 1 Indie.

44 Seats in the Senate and 202 Seats in the House is evidence that Democrats are being elected, unless you'd like to suggest that they spring into office fully formed from Dean's brow.

It is an aberation in American history that such a narrow majority has entirely locked out such a large minority.
 

Back
Top Bottom