Qanon Conspiracy theories

Status
Not open for further replies.
Mycroft said:
Here's the thing about questions like that; you don't draw conclusions from the question itself. If you think the likely answer to the question is yes, you then start to look for evidence to support it.

If you find the evidence, then you've uncovered a conspiracy. If you don't find evidence, then it's most likely there is no conspiracy to uncover.

But here's the most important part: that you imagine something could be true isn't evidence that it is true.

Understanding that is the difference between skeptics and conspiritards.
Click to expand...



Edited by zooterkin: 
<SNIP>
Edited for rule 0 and rule 12.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Abaddon,

You're such a dear to me. I will explain. I did not have a link because it came to me by word of mouth, from a friend who knows someone with access to the goods.

I'm not talking about the guys paid to stand outside the federal courthouses with notepads and cameras. They probably have the goods as well.
 
abaddon said:
That is a concession that you have no evidence for any of this crap.
Click to expand...


Why must it be "crap" please? Playbook say so?

Is it because if its true you would wear the egg of concession on your smiley face?

Seriously though, I know you and all my other bosom buddies here are not like that, despite the bluster and insult hurling. I am sure y'all will get right up to speed when you discover it is not "crap".
 
Bubba said:
Why must it be "crap" please? Playbook say so?

Is it because if its true you would wear the egg of concession on your smiley face?

Seriously though, I know you and all my other bosom buddies here are not like that, despite the bluster and insult hurling. I am sure y'all will get right up to speed when you discover it is not "crap".
Click to expand...

Logic and reason say it is a load. You have no evidence, thus there is no reason to believe a word of any of the Q stuff.

If you had evidence, you would have posted it by now. If that evidence were solid, I would believe it by now. An anecdote from another anonymous Q-nut who told you something one time is useless.
 
There is no hyperlink to "guy down at the pub told me" though. Also no link to "My cousin's brother-in-law's boss says that he heard" etc.
 
abaddon said:
Logic and reason say it is a load. You have no evidence, thus there is no reason to believe a word of any of the Q stuff.

If you had evidence, you would have posted it by now. If that evidence were solid, I would believe it by now. An anecdote from another anonymous Q-nut who told you something one time is useless.
Click to expand...



I looked. Did you?

AFAIK there is nothing you'd accept as evidence, yet.

My guy says Barr's guy Durham is on it. A DC grand jury is convened. Subpoenas issued.

Time will reveal whether or not it is a load of crap.
 
Last edited:
Bubba said:
Time will reveal whether or not it is a load of crap.
Click to expand...

No it goddamn won't because that's not how conspiracy theories work.

When the evidence, yet again, shows literally no evidence of a secret cabal of child sex aficionados running the world that Donald Trump is fighting, you'll keep looking.

That's the problem (jeez why am I have yet another version of this discussion) with looking for something with no evidence, you won't stop looking after you find no evidence.
 
Last edited:
Bubba said:
I looked. Did you?

AFAIK there is nothing you'd accept as evidence, yet.

My guy says Barr's guy Durham is on it. A DC grand jury is convened. Subpoenas issued.

Time will reveal whether or not it is a load of crap.
Click to expand...

If there's no evidence yet, it's already a load of crap. A lucky guess is not a prediction even if it's right.
e.t.a. when it comes to that, even an intelligent, well informed, educated guess is not a prediction. Not that there is much chance of seeing one here.
 
Last edited:
JoeMorgue said:
No it goddamn won't because that's not how conspiracy theories work.

When the evidence, yet again, shows literally no evidence of a secret cabal of child sex aficionados running the world that Donald Trump is fighting, you'll keep looking.

That's the problem (jeez why am I have yet another version of this discussion) with looking for something with no evidence, you won't stop looking after you find no evidence.
Click to expand...

Hi Joe, my old pal

Seems you missed post 2377 because the item being discussed is there:


Bubba said:
Brethren,

Hear Ye Hear Ye.....Good tidings for all !

Those who were part of the illegal coup to unseat POTUS will soon face justice, finally.

Well, some of them, at least. Grand jury subpoenas were issued.
Click to expand...


Thanks anyway for the drive by pot shot !

.
 
bruto said:
If there's no evidence yet, it's already a load of crap.
Click to expand...
How true. However if the rumor is real, there must be something to it. No evidence, no subpoena seems fair to say. Patience. Time will tell. If they are really doing this, its safe to assume IMO they will want it public before the election.
 
Last edited:
Bubba said:
I looked. Did you?

AFAIK there is nothing you'd accept as evidence, yet.

My guy says Barr's guy Durham is on it. A DC grand jury is convened. Subpoenas issued.

Time will reveal whether or not it is a load of crap.
Click to expand...

If all this were true why don't the 'evil' people react? Why don't they flee the country? Why aren't they lawyering up? Why aren't they just killing off the people acting against them?

As a matter of fact they don't seem to be doing anything at all......
 
Bubba said:
How true.

However if the rumor is real, there must be something to it. No evidence, no subpoena seems fair to say.

Patience. Time will tell.

If they are really doing this, its safe to assume IMO they will want it public before the election.
Click to expand...

If a rumor is a rumor, it's not anything else, even if it turns out to be right. Plenty of rumors are not real, but it's worthless to judge the rumor's reality after the fact. If someone is doing something and wants to make it public, then it will become public when and if that happens, and guessing whether or not it will happen is nothing. Time will tell what will happen, and if you guess right you get credit for a good guess. If you guess right more often than you guess wrong, you get credit for being a good guesser. That's it.
 
Bubba said:
I looked. Did you?
Click to expand...
Yup.

Bubba said:
AFAIK there is nothing you'd accept as evidence, yet.
Click to expand...
How do you know that? You have yet to present ANY evidence at all.

Bubba said:
My guy says Barr's guy Durham is on it. A DC grand jury is convened. Subpoenas issued.
Click to expand...
Yet you are incapable of presenting evidence for that AT ALL. I cannot consider the evidence if you refuse to provide any.

Bubba said:
Time will reveal whether or not it is a load of crap.
Click to expand...
It already has. The list of Q-Fails just grows.
 
Bubba said:
How true.

However if the rumor is real, there must be something to it. No evidence, no subpoena seems fair to say.

Patience. Time will tell.

If they are really doing this, its safe to assume IMO they will want it public before the election.
Click to expand...

Oh boy will this come back to haunt you.
 
abaddon said:
Oh boy will this come back to haunt you.
Click to expand...


Huh?

Seems straightforward enuf.

Supposedly Durham is finally at grand jury subpoena stage, after many moons of globe girdling investigation of the origins of the investigation that ended with the Mueller report. It was reported Durham went to Italy and Australia IIRC.

If they think they can prove it was a coup attempt fraud based on lies etc, they would want to discredit the Dems with it before the election.

If there are indictments but no convictions, egg is on Donald's face. If there are no grand jury subpoena, egg on my face.

Anything to add?
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom