Qanon Conspiracy theories

Status
Not open for further replies.
So Obama got some Emails from Hillary's private email account. Is there evidence that these were emails that should have been on some other account, or evidence that they were secret, or is it just evidence that Hillary sent some stuff to Obama? The issue is, after all, whether Hillary misused her private account, not whether she had one.

Well, actually that was not what I was going to mention. I got side tracked. What I meant to mention was that speaking about the "clamor consensus" as anything but a thing to avoid pretty much nails what is wrong with a Q thread. The clamor consensus is a closet full of toilet paper and a pantry full of pasta.

Taking over from Q for a moment, I predict that people who invest in the pest control industry and whatever product is good for poisoning food moths will do very well later this year.
 
So Obama got some Emails from Hillary's private email account. Is there evidence that these were emails that should have been on some other account, or evidence that they were secret, or is it just evidence that Hillary sent some stuff to Obama? The issue is, after all, whether Hillary misused her private account, not whether she had one.



Did you miss the part where Obama lied on tv ?

Or the part where Mills said gotta clean this it up ?

Thats not an an issue ?

Besides everyone knows Hillary did not misuse her secret email. She explained immediately when it was reported. It was for yoga classes and wedding plans for Web's daughter.


The issue is, after all, whether Hillary misused her private account, not whether she had one.


How about why did he lie and what were he and she emailing about?
 
Did you miss the part where Obama lied on tv ?

Or the part where Mills said gotta clean this it up ?

Thats not an an issue ?

Besides everyone knows Hillary did not misuse her secret email. She explained immediately when it was reported. It was for yoga classes and wedding plans for Web's daughter.





How about why did he lie and what were he and she emailing about?

I missed it indeed. All I saw was evidence that Obama knew Hillary had a personal email account and used it. That is not illegal as far as I know. If there is evidence that Obama knew she misused it, I did not see it here.
 
I missed it indeed. All I saw was evidence that Obama knew Hillary had a personal email account and used it. That is not illegal as far as I know. If there is evidence that Obama knew she misused it, I did not see it here.


The point is when did he know about it? He said on tv that he found out about it the same day the nation heard of it.

Then wikileaks produces Cheryl Mills email telling Podesta "we need to clean this up. Potus has emails from her that are not state.gov emails."

So he lied about when he found out.
 
Last edited:
Anyone recall when it was Q said Trump would be restructuring the central bank system?
 
Oh Nooos.....what do we do when faced with public record truths about deleting emails and bleachbit, which we were wrong about. Do we admit it?

Funny how you forgot to mention that Gowdy is a Republican Senator, and that his characterisation of BleachBit is flatly contradicted by the computer expert quoted in the article.
In what way was was I wrong? Your article quotes two people: one is a computer expert, and the other is a member of the US government.
I chose to believe the computer expert.
You chose to believe the government.
Would you rather I had blindly accepted the word of the government?
In what way was I wrong?

- Mr. "DNA indicates birthplace"

Oh, bless. Are you still hurting from that one?
Sorry, but gaslighting won't help you. Do please appeal to the army of lurkers, if you think that will help. Good luck with finding anyone who supports your version of this comical episode.
 
The point is when did he know about it? He said on tv that he found out about it the same day the nation heard of it.

Then wikileaks produces Cheryl Mills email telling Podesta "we need to clean this up. Potus has emails from her that are not state.gov emails."

So he lied about when he found out.
So what you have is a couple of people saying without apparent corroboration that Obama got some emails from Hillary. It does not, as far as I can see, say what they were about, or whether their content was inappropriate. Nor, as far as I can see, is there evidence that, whatever their content, Obama made note of what account they came from. It seems at least possible that a president receiving a lot of stuff in a day might not have paid attention to the headers. In any case, it's a pretty weak allegation about a pretty trivial matter - more so since some of the people making the biggest stink about it appear to have been doing the same thing.
 
I have to say, I've been following Qanon for a fairly long time and the more I read about this, it looks like the grandest and most successful social experiment ever.

I sure hope one day there's a reveal.
 
“Q” must have missed the part where Trump holds up desperately-needed aid for states whose governors don’t kiss his enormous ass enough. Of course, the dolts who buy into the infantile “Q” and “Deep State” fantasies are just fine with it.

As I’ve said, none of them get to claim the mantle of “patriot”. They are fundamentally un-American; in fact, anti-American. All because believing this malicious twaddle makes them feel clever.
 
I have to say, I've been following Qanon for a fairly long time and the more I read about this, it looks like the grandest and most successful social experiment ever.



Maybe, maybe not.

Time will tell.

Roughly 12 yrs, last I heard. (from a top expert)
 
Last edited:
Maybe, maybe not.

Time will tell.

Roughly 12 yrs, last I heard. (from a top expert)

Nah for you, it appears to be an eternal belief - you've been told what to believe and gosh darn you'll just go on believing it even if it never comes true.

Chuckle
 
“Q” must have missed the part where Trump holds up desperately-needed aid for states whose governors don’t kiss his enormous ass enough. Of course, the dolts who buy into the infantile “Q” and “Deep State” fantasies are just fine with it.

As I’ve said, none of them get to claim the mantle of “patriot”. They are fundamentally un-American; in fact, anti-American. All because believing this malicious twaddle makes them feel clever.

Not to mention their vile, scummy habit of labeling various and sundry persons as pedos without a whifff of evidence. Truly filth.
 
Not to mention their vile, scummy habit of labeling various and sundry persons as pedos without a whifff of evidence. Truly filth.



Not so fast there pard.

While true about the unfounded silly slanderous accusations, Epstein & co were different.

Jimmy Savile was another (although pre Qanon). As if those two had no cohorts in high places. Id guess its a long standing tradition among the euro elites in their grand houses since forever. Like the clergy, even. Dont say its not.


Then there is this

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/v...at_network_quashed_jeffrey_epstein_story.html
 
Not to mention their vile, scummy habit of labeling various and sundry persons as pedos without a whifff of evidence. Truly filth.

That is disgusting. What makes it worse is that this malicious fantasy is part of their idiot devotion to a genuine degenerate - repeat philanderer, bragging about sexual abuse, boasting about walking in on 15-year-olds in their dressing room, nauseating fixation on his own daughter. That's their hero. Even aside from his treasonous behavior, juvenile spitefulness, utter incompetence, bigotry, tax fraud, and corruption, that alone says all you need to know about the "Q"/"Deep State" believers.
 
Not so fast there pard.

While true about the unfounded silly slanderous accusations, Epstein & co were different.
Q-nuts habitually make pedo accusations without a whiff of evidence. That's just evil and disgusting, period, pard.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom