Qanon Conspiracy theories

Status
Not open for further replies.
All the seekrit indictments are going to be released and the deep state agents frogmarched off to Gitmo! Oh, wait, that was last year. Or maybe two years ago, time flies.
 
Trebuchet said:
All the seekrit indictments are going to be released and the deep state agents frogmarched off to Gitmo! Oh, wait, that was last year. Or maybe two years ago, time flies.
Click to expand...

Silly fool. They are already at Gitmo, they've been there for months. DEC4 is when the military tribunals will hand down the sentences and the hangings will start.
 
Q predicted that FISA is a dumpster fire of bad procedure.

That's pretty weak tea. Every civil rights organization in the country has been pointing out the many inadequacies of FISA for over a decade.
 
There is no Q. There is a person pretending to be Q throwing **** at the wall to see what sticks. This beguiles the credulous.
 
SuburbanTurkey said:
Q predicted that FISA is a dumpster fire of bad procedure.

That's pretty weak tea. Every civil rights organization in the country has been pointing out the many inadequacies of FISA for over a decade.
Click to expand...

2002 GOP: We need to pass the USA Patriot Act because National Security.

2002 ACLU: Have you idiots read this law? The FISA requirements are almost non-existent.

2002 GOP: NATIONAL SECURITY! TERRORISTS!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

2019 GOP: Wow, that FBI FISA warrant in the Trump Campaign case is kinda thin.

2019 Inspector General: Yup, but within the law. Thanks guys.
 
Axxman300 said:
2002 GOP: We need to pass the USA Patriot Act because National Security.

2002 ACLU: Have you idiots read this law? The FISA requirements are almost non-existent.

2002 GOP: NATIONAL SECURITY! TERRORISTS!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

2019 GOP: Wow, that FBI FISA warrant in the Trump Campaign case is kinda thin.

2019 Inspector General: Yup, but within the law. Thanks guys.
Click to expand...

I suspect that if as much scrutiny was given to all the other FISA warrants, you'd find all kinds of dishonesty and sloppy police work from the feds. The system is set up that there is really no reason why the feds wouldn't behave this way.
 
SuburbanTurkey said:
I suspect that if as much scrutiny was given to all the other FISA warrants, you'd find all kinds of dishonesty and sloppy police work from the feds. The system is set up that there is really no reason why the feds wouldn't behave this way.
Click to expand...

The ACLU has been complaining about the new FISA rules for years:

https://www.aclu.org/cases/aclu-mot...ss-fisa-court-rulings-government-surveillance

The FISC order compelled a Verizon subsidiary to provide to the NSA call records for every phone call placed on its network during a three-month period. Four days later, we and Yale Law School’s Media Freedom and Information Access (MFIA) clinic filed a motion with the FISC requesting that it publish its opinions on the meaning, scope, and constitutionality of Section 215.

The Verizon call-records order, it emerged, belonged to a much larger surveillance program — covering all of the major telephone companies — that had secretly existed for nearly a decade. In the course of the national debate that followed the first disclosure, two things became clear: (1) the phone-records program was not the only bulk-collection surveillance program in which the NSA had engaged; and (2) the FISC opinions interpreting Section 215 are not the only secret court opinions addressing the lawfulness of bulk surveillance.
Click to expand...

It has not been a secret.
 
C'mon guys, admit it.....we all knew Durham would use a grand jury, and we all know there will be no indictments because we just knew it, certainly not Brennan or Comey, just like we all know Durham is famous for grandstanding and stunts.

I'm worried we might look bad wearing egg if some lower level guy decides cooperating looks better than going away for them.
 
We mustn't on that the G-Men withheld exculpatory evidence while feeding garbage to the FISA court.

And now that whiny FISA court judge had the gall to smear our man Comey after that liar Horowitz reported about 20 FBI errors, all of which tilted the table in the same direction, building our ironclad case against Trump.

No worry. Deny everything and we will be in the clear.
 
Bubba said:
We mustn't on that the G-Men withheld exculpatory evidence while feeding garbage to the FISA court.

And now that whiny FISA court judge had the gall to smear our man Comey after that liar Horowitz reported about 20 FBI errors, all of which tilted the table in the same direction, building our ironclad case against Trump.

No worry. Deny everything and we will be in the clear.
Click to expand...

FISA abuse is built into the system. It's a legal proceeding where the defendant doesn't even know he's being targeted and has no advocate. The government goes into a secret room with a judge and feeds them exactly what the judge needs to hear to grant a warrant.

Of course FISA warrant applications withheld evidence. Of course the feds lied on them. Not just for Trump, but for whenever they felt it advantageous or necessary. FISA is a joke.

There is nothing new about Trump's complaints other than suddenly Republicans care about the surveillance state having too much power.
 
Q posts another wristwatch pic (at 1:29)

Horowitz then Barr/Durham release their statements at 1:29.

Its nothing of course.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom