Qanon Conspiracy theories

Status
Not open for further replies.
Polticized much?





Did we fall for the loonies' left wing russian collusion hoax?

Rachel didnt tell you someone caught CNN admitting it was BS ?

'Project Veritas' Catches CNN Producer Admitting Russia Story Is "Mostly ********," "About Ratings"


"I can’t think of a right-wing conspiracy claim that turned out to be warranted"

"I'll counter this point not by bringing up a right-wing conspiracy claim that was warranted, but by posting about a left-wing conspiracy claim with a broken link!*"

And you wonder why we don't buy your ********.




*and let's just address that link, shall we? Who was the guy being filmed?

"“I haven’t seen any good enough evidence to show that the president committed a crime,” CNN supervising producer John Bonifield, who works in the network's medical unit, says in the clip."

So, a guy who doesn't even work in that division of CNN, in a video produced by someone notorious for editing video deceptively, saying something dismissive, that is nothing more than his own personal opinion, is supposed to be what, exactly? It's certainly not convincing.
 
"I can’t think of a right-wing conspiracy claim that turned out to be warranted"

"I'll counter this point not by bringing up a right-wing conspiracy claim that was warranted, but by posting about a left-wing conspiracy claim with a broken link!*"

And you wonder why we don't buy your ********.




*and let's just address that link, shall we? Who was the guy being filmed?

"“I haven’t seen any good enough evidence to show that the president committed a crime,” CNN supervising producer John Bonifield, who works in the network's medical unit, says in the clip."

So, a guy who doesn't even work in that division of CNN, in a video produced by someone notorious for editing video deceptively, saying something dismissive, that is nothing more than his own personal opinion, is supposed to be what, exactly? It's certainly not convincing.

To be fair a lot of YT videos have been manipulated to show the producers "beliefs" not necessarily fact that can be substantiated.
 
O'Keefe is in his own league, though.

I'm assuming you mean Ken O'Keefe, but there are a lot more on YT that push their agenda as "poorly"/""ideological"/"hoax"/"big bad lying government" such as Eric Dubay, Pascal Xavier ALA hunchbacked, Jarrah White to name a few.

Now realize I'm not disagreeing with you just pointing out that there are others in the same camp of stupid people that use YT to dispense BS.
 
"I can’t think of a right-wing conspiracy claim that turned out to be warranted"

"I'll counter this point not by bringing up a right-wing conspiracy claim that was warranted, but by posting about a left-wing conspiracy claim with a broken link!*"

And you wonder why we don't buy your ********.




*and let's just address that link, shall we? Who was the guy being filmed?

"“I haven’t seen any good enough evidence to show that the president committed a crime,” CNN supervising producer John Bonifield, who works in the network's medical unit, says in the clip."

So, a guy who doesn't even work in that division of CNN, in a video produced by someone notorious for editing video deceptively, saying something dismissive, that is nothing more than his own personal opinion, is supposed to be what, exactly? It's certainly not convincing.



Deeply sorry re bad link.


Silver lining:

Project Veritas’ American Pravda: CNN continues today with a video of left-leaning political commentator Van Jones caught on camera plainly stating that “the Russia thing is just a big nothing burger.”

This video comes just a day after CNN's statement declaring John Bonifield was just a "health producer" and "isn’t involved in Russia or Trump coverage."

https://www.projectveritas.com/american-pravda-cnn/
 
I'm assuming you mean Ken O'Keefe, but there are a lot more on YT that push their agenda as "poorly"/""ideological"/"hoax"/"big bad lying government" such as Eric Dubay, Pascal Xavier ALA hunchbacked, Jarrah White to name a few.



Now realize I'm not disagreeing with you just pointing out that there are others in the same camp of stupid people that use YT to dispense BS.
No, I meant James O'Keefe of Project Veritas.
 
Do tell when Rachel reports those nothingburger and BS comments from CNN's Bonfield and Jones
 
regarding


Bonifield said:
" I haven’t seen any good enough evidence to show that the president committed a crime,” CNN supervising producer John Bonifield, who works in the network's medical unit, says in the clip."


(Bonifield also said 'the president is right to say we are witch hunting him'.... Its all about ratings' )

Horatius posted,
by Horatius


*and let's just address that link, shall we? Who was the guy being filmed?


So, a guy who doesn't even work in that division of CNN, in a video produced by someone notorious for editing video deceptively, saying something dismissive, that is nothing more than his own personal opinion, is supposed to be what, exactly? It's certainly not convincing.


This bit strikes me as sorta lame: "...a guy who doesn't even work in that division of CNN."


Bonifield mentioned being in staff meetings with their boss.
Did Rachel assure you Bonifield never talks with other CNN producers, off camera ?


...just a day after CNN's statement declaring John Bonifield was just a "health producer" and "isn’t involved in Russia or Trump coverage, etc, along comes a bigger fire you'd have to extinguish :


"https://www.projectveritas.com/american-pravda-cnn/
 
It's like we just went in a time warp back to 2008.

I don't understand, Bubba.

Can you get out a blackboard and draw words and lines all over it for me?

ETA: bonus points if you cry about how you fear for America's future.
 
At least in general. I don’t remember some of the more specific details. There’s the typical mishmash of classifications as bureaucracy evolves over decades, including the amusing detail that “Formerly Restricted Data”... still is.

As in classified data that may or may not have been unclassified over the decades? Apollo data was classified secret for a bit until that all was unclassified.
 
Seltzer water is good. I like it best when it's only lightly sparking. In Germany, they sell "lightly" and "medium" sparkling, which are nice options to have.
 
Apollo data was classified secret for a bit until that all was unclassified.

Project Chapel Bell is still classified, though widely rumored to relate to over-the-horizon radar. Not even the astronauts were told what it was, only that it pertained to the launch vehicle only and not their mission. A lot of the bits of Apollo were classified for obvious reasons: they dealt with U.S. missile capability. Some, like the low-light television pickup tubes, were just sort of handed to Apollo under the table from Defense without talking a lot about it. The debriefings were classified for a standard 25 years because they dealt with the crew's private health information. They were automatically declassified according to a standard stand-down schedule.

That illustrates really how it works. The actual astronauts who flew in the rocket were still not code-word cleared to know some aspects of the missions. Sure, they knew a lot about how the rockets worked, and therefore had to have the appropriate general clearance levels. But operational security works on a need-to-know basis. Even an engineer who needed access to the mission debriefing while it was still classified was probably likely to be given a version from which private crew information had been redacted. He may be Top Secret cleared to read the technical material, and code-word cleared to get the precise information he needs, but that doesn't given him access to information he does not need to know. A schema to map Dept. of Energy clearances to those in other agencies is kind of a red herring. It doesn't capture what really goes on.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom