Qanon Conspiracy theories

Status
Not open for further replies.
Quote:
There are millions of Americans who really like the idea of patriot brass backing Trump with their military intelligence system because they would be bound by duty to arrest Hillary if she won.


Yes, those Americans are called Confederates.



Hogwash,

If they have solid proof Generals should act.

I hear the Turkish military cleaned house a few times over the years. When necessary, they'd do it quietly on a Friday afternoon, and step aside before Monday when possible, or as soon as new leaders were elected.

A non-coup. Sounds reasonable. Thats good brass.

However this most recent time, those good Turkish brass got set up by the crooks they would have removed on a Friday. A noisy fake coup was staged on a Wednesday by the crooks in power, who blamed the good brass and arrested them.

Good military is always a threat to crooks in power.

Before you go hog wild, remember I said "if".
 
Hogwash,

If they have solid proof Generals should act.

I hear the Turkish military cleaned house a few times over the years. When necessary, they'd do it quietly on a Friday afternoon, and step aside before Monday when possible, or as soon as new leaders were elected.

A non-coup. Sounds reasonable. Thats good brass.

However this most recent time, those good Turkish brass got set up by the crooks they would have removed on a Friday. A noisy fake coup was staged on a Wednesday by the crooks in power, who blamed the good brass and arrested them.

Good military is always a threat to crooks in power.

Before you go hog wild, remember I said "if".

Dude, how old are you, seriously?!*




*Turkish symp tendencies duly noted and added to your file. That is all.
 
Apparently you actually believe media owners do not do favors for friends, censor, or take orders.

From which of my posts do you take this claim?

This is SOP for conspiracy theorists. "If you don't believe my far-fetched claims, you must be a naive and gullible dupe!"

Please answer my request for evidence that all media is owned by the same group, and that this group had a unified agenda.
Thanks.
<snipped swift change of subject>

https://www.metabunk.org/bilderberger-group-cover-up-in-the-media-explained.t1466/



If you'd read the rest of the thread, you would have spotted this:
Brief history

Bilderberg takes its name from the hotel in Holland, where the first meeting took place in May 1954. That pioneering meeting grew out of the concern expressed by leading citizens on both sides of the Atlantic that Western Europe and North America were not working together as closely as they should on common problems of critical importance. It was felt that regular, off-the-record discussions would help create a better understanding of the complex forces and major trends affecting Western nations in the difficult post-war period.
The Cold War has now ended. But in practically all respects there are more, not fewer, common problems - from trade to jobs, from monetary policy to investment, from ecological challenges to the task of promoting international security. It is hard to think of any major issue in either Europe or North America whose unilateral solution would not have repercussions for the other.
Thus the concept of a European-American forum has not been overtaken by time. The dialogue between these two regions is still - even increasingly - critical.
Character of meetings


What is unique about Bilderberg as a forum is
the broad cross-section of leading citizens that are assembled for nearly three days of informal and off-the-record discussion about topics of current concern especially in the fields of foreign affairs and the international economy;
the strong feeling among participants that in view of the differing attitudes and experiences of the Western nations, there remains a clear need to further develop an understanding in which these concerns can be accommodated;
the privacy of the meetings, which has no purpose other than to allow participants to speak their minds openly and freely.

In short, Bilderberg is a small, flexible, informal and off-the-record international forum in which different viewpoints can be expressed and mutual understanding enhanced. Bilderberg's only activity is its annual Conference. At the meetings, no resolutions are proposed, no votes taken, and no policy statements issued. Since 1954, fifty-nine conferences have been held. For each meeting, the names of the participants as well as the agenda are made Public and available to the press.
Participants


Invitations to Bilderberg conferences are extended by the Chairman following consultation with the Steering Committee members. Participants are chosen for their experience, their knowledge, their standing and their contribution to the selected agenda.
There usually are about 120 participants of whom about two-thirds come from Europe and the balance from North America. About one-third is from government and politics, and two-thirds from finance, industry, labour, education and communications. Participants attend Bilderberg in a private and not an official capacity.
Governance and Funding


Bilderberg is governed by a Steering Committee which designates a Chairman; members are elected for a term of four years and can be re-elected. There are no other members of the Bilderberg conference. The Chair's main responsibilities are to chair the Steering Committee and to prepare with the Steering Committee the conference program, the selection of participants. He also makes suggestions to the Steering Committee regarding its composition. The Executive Secretary reports to the Chairman.


The expenses of maintaining the small Secretariat of the Bilderberg meetings are covered wholly by private subscription. The hospitality costs of the annual meeting are the responsibility of the Steering Committee member(s) of the host country.

Pretty much shoots your argument down.
You have debunked yourself again. Well done.
Now, how about you answer all those tricky questions I've put to you? The ones you are running away from. Those ones.
 
Never mind. I posted a dumb thing and now I deleted it. Happy Monday.
 
Last edited:
Shall we take that as your carefully considered wisdom on that 450% spike since december in sealed court documents ?

The two sealed documents that exist right now that I have first hand knowledge of doesn't have anything to do with this fantasy.

I'm sure I'm not unique.
 
From which of my posts do you take this claim?

This is SOP for conspiracy theorists. "If you don't believe my far-fetched claims, you must be a naive and gullible dupe!"

Please answer my request for evidence that all media is owned by the same group, and that this group had a unified agenda.
Thanks.


https://www.metabunk.org/bilderberger-group-cover-up-in-the-media-explained.t1466/



If you'd read the rest of the thread, you would have spotted this:


Pretty much shoots your argument down.
You have debunked yourself again. Well done.
Now, how about you answer all those tricky questions I've put to you? The ones you are running away from. Those ones.


You're so funny.

a) I didn't say one group owned media. I said 'they' referring to type..

b) Oh but I did read the whole metabunk item. I posted it anyway, to be fair and balanced, just for you. Go ahead and swallow Bilderberg's own sweet description of how innocent they are, if you must.
 
I find it telling that once Bilderberg was outed by actual real journalists, the boot lickers and the statists eagerly swallow Bilderberg's own belated description of of itself being sweet, altruistic, innocent good guys after 60 yrs of complicit media blackout of their secret meetings.

Reminds me of how dysfunctional abused children are known to deny/defend the abusive dad or mom.

"The meetings are not secret" cry the statists, while their media blackout mostly continues.


Q anon points out the fact that the video in post #267 mentions Trump's position against Bilderberg and their programs, naming the programs, without saying the word Bilderberg, strategically .
 
Last edited:
If there are no inictments/arrests, Y'all can party on.

What if the opposite unfolds?

Time will tell.
 
New from Q


Information Warfare: WaPo/Amazon/CIA Attacking Q
2401
Q
!!mG7VJxZNCI
4 Nov 2018 - 7:18:15 AM
https://www.washingtonpost.com/amph...48a8f0-ded3-11e8-b3f0-62607289efee_story.html
When you can't discredit this movement using logic and facts, you resort to comparing it to ART?
How many articles has the WASH POST released attacking the 'Q' movement?
Why is the WASH POST dedicated to attacking this movement?
WASH POST owned by AMAZON?
ABC's & AMAZON
https://www.theatlantic.com/technol...tails-about-the-cias-deal-with-amazon/374632/
If we aren't a threat, or real, or simply just a conspiracy theory, why the [constant] heavy attacks?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vTGkcTWCaio
[Information Warfare][IW]
[Destroy the Controlled Narrative]
POWER BELONGS WITH THE PEOPLE.
WWG1WGA!!!
(((Q+)))
Q
 
Hogwash,

If they have solid proof Generals should act.

I hear the Turkish military cleaned house a few times over the years. When necessary, they'd do it quietly on a Friday afternoon, and step aside before Monday when possible, or as soon as new leaders were elected.

A non-coup. Sounds reasonable. Thats good brass.

However this most recent time, those good Turkish brass got set up by the crooks they would have removed on a Friday. A noisy fake coup was staged on a Wednesday by the crooks in power, who blamed the good brass and arrested them.

Good military is always a threat to crooks in power.

Before you go hog wild, remember I said "if".

You should fear the Turkish model of government.

People who run their mouths, end up vanishing in the dead of night, or are found "beaten and robbed" in an alley somewhere. The Turkish government never goes after the powerful, they go after the little guy trying to make a difference...every time...

Everything you just wrote here is anti-American.
 
I guess that writing in this affected, frenetic telegram style makes it seem more cool to the in-the-know conspiracy people? Like, ooh, he posted this at exactly this time to the second, that's very official!

@#5542`55
Conspiracy Forum (CF): Fakery/ALLCAPS/They're out to get me
#280
5 Nov 2018 - 1:48:43 PM
When you can't make your point, you resort to writing in ALLCAPS?
How many conspiracy theories have been posted in this sub-forum?
Why is poster CARLITO lampooning this conspiracy theory?
CARLITO [carlitos] posting on ISF [formerly JREF] forum
Propaganda Disinfo (((PD)))
We are all SPARTACUS.
PDQLMFAO!!!!
('LITO OUT)
C
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom