• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

"Psychic detective" Jackie Barrett

sg1985

Thinker
Joined
Sep 18, 2008
Messages
162
I'm writing an article on Jackie Barrett and her "psychic detective" work. I've been looking for all the information that I can about this woman and I wanted to know if anyone has heard of her or is familiar with her "work". She came in second place in America's Psychic Challenge and was recently featured in the WeTV series "Secret Lives of Women: Psychics." Needless to say, she hasn't applied to take the million dollar challenge.

I found a multitude of sources on her and have put together several pages of notes. I can't post links yet, so I won't post everything. Here is a sample of what I have so far. These notes were mostly taken from her website The House that Kay Built (she also published a book with the same title).

If you can find any of the sources that I can't substantiate I'd really appreciate your help.




"First off, she doesn't know how to use spell check on her website and has a very poor command of grammar. Seriously, she constantly uses "there" when she means "their".

She frequently states that she works closely with retired NYPD Captain Sean Crowley. She has said that he worked in the cold case department. The About Me section of his new website doesn't list this. It also doesn't mention Jackie. I e-mailed him and he agreed to answer some questions about her. I sent a bunch of questions, haven't heard anything back yet.

She states that she's constantly being used as a consultant for movies about Voodoo. She has no IMDB page.

She touts the book that she wrote, The House That Kay Built, as a #1 best seller. The book is 88 pages long and is self-published through iUniverse. She doesn't mention where the book was declared a best seller or what category of literature it reached the top spot in.

She says that her mother was a spiritualist and John Lennon, Andy Warhol, Jim Morrison and Johnny Cash would all come over to chill at her house.

She says that she worked on America's Most Wanted. Can't find any info to substantiate it.

Says that her 2008 Superbowl predictions were featured in the New York Post and she was eventually found to be completely right. Can't find any info to substantiate it.

Says that she has been recognized by Yale, NYU and Standford (I think she means Stanford) in their "law crime anylist department." None of the universities have departments with this name and none mention her on their websites. I e-mailed representatives of each school. No response so far, but I have a good guess what they're going to say. She also states that was interviewed by Yale students in order for them to obtain their masters degrees. Can't find any info to substantiate it.

She claims to be the #1 crime solver in the US. Can't find any info to substantiate it."
 
Before they died, after they died or both?

I'm not sure. She states in a podcast that her mother was a spiritualist and mentions the names of some of the people who hung out in her house.

Her website states "I learned to embrace my inheritance through daily conversations with Padre Pio."

Pio died in 1968, she was born in 1963 (according to her Myspace page she is 45 years old). I assume that these conversations take/took place after he died.

Website continues "Artist & musicians have come to me for some words of wisdom from people like John Lennon and Andy Warhol."

Which can be interpreted as her telling someone "Imagine all the people/Living for today." It can be read that these people personally passed the words of wisdom onto her and she shares it with someone else.
 
Last edited:
Says that her 2008 Superbowl predictions were featured in the New York Post and she was eventually found to be completely right. Can't find any info to substantiate it.
Eventually? Does she herself use that word? She'd have been found to be right or wrong at the exact second the game ended!! :eek:
 
Eventually? Does she herself use that word? She'd have been found to be right or wrong at the exact second the game ended!! :eek:

Here is what her website states:

"CHECK OUT JACKIE'S 08' SUPER BOWL PREDICTION IN THE NY POST FEB 1ST


Check out Jackie Barrett's 2008 Super bowl prediction in The New York Post tomorrow Febuary 1st. Jackie has made her prediction check tomorrow's paper to see if your team is on the winning side.

WOW! Just as Jackie said in the February 1st NY Post paper the Giants would win & Patriots score was exactly as Jackie said 14. Best Of Louisiana Magazine quoted Jackie Barrett as " One Of The Most Impressive Psychic's Of Our Time". "

Her website is done in reverse chronological order, so the info about her making her predictions should be on the bottom, with the predictions being proven correct at the top.

It should also be noted that "Best of Louisiana" magazine does not pop up under any search engines. This could be because she got the name wrong (she also got the name wrong of the podcast that she was on so it took me a while to find it) or the magazine is so small that it doesn't have a website.

But this is what she seems to constantly do. She has no proof, no photos of the articles, no press portfolio with any substance.

Btw, I just started listening to the first podcast and she stated that she was in the presence of Padre Pio when she was a young teenager. As I stated, if she's not lying about her age, she was 5 years old when he died. This isn't in an article, this isn't on her website, these are the words that are coming out of her mouth. There is no way for her to refute this.
 
Last edited:
Sounds like a "Stop Jackie Barrett" website might be in order.

Exactly what I thought. I figured that she's so low profile that no one has really bothered with her so if this article gets published I can imagine that the people who read it are going to know who she is and not in a good way.

So far, no response from the e-mails that I've sent. Will update as I go.
 
Last edited:
Here is what her website states:

"CHECK OUT JACKIE'S 08' SUPER BOWL PREDICTION IN THE NY POST FEB 1ST


Check out Jackie Barrett's 2008 Super bowl prediction in The New York Post tomorrow Febuary 1st. Jackie has made her prediction check tomorrow's paper to see if your team is on the winning side.

WOW! Just as Jackie said in the February 1st NY Post paper the Giants would win & Patriots score was exactly as Jackie said 14.
QUOTE]


WOW - a 50/50 shot on the winner and a general (2 TD) score on one team. NOBODY can do that! :rolleyes:
 
Here is what her website states:

"CHECK OUT JACKIE'S 08' SUPER BOWL PREDICTION IN THE NY POST FEB 1ST


Check out Jackie Barrett's 2008 Super bowl prediction in The New York Post tomorrow Febuary 1st. Jackie has made her prediction check tomorrow's paper to see if your team is on the winning side.

WOW! Just as Jackie said in the February 1st NY Post paper the Giants would win & Patriots score was exactly as Jackie said 14.
QUOTE]


WOW - a 50/50 shot on the winner and a general (2 TD) score on one team. NOBODY can do that! :rolleyes:



And because they say nothing about the Giants score, that means she must have got it wrong. I love how they dont mention that.
 
Exactly what I thought. I figured that she's so low profile that no one has really bothered with her so if this article gets published I can imagine that the people who read it are going to know who she is and not in a good way.

So far, no response from the e-mails that I've sent. Will update as I go.

I'll certainly be interested in reading what you come up with.
 
I'll certainly be interested in reading what you come up with.

I'll let you know when I get it posted. Although I think I might have to cut some info out. I could probably write this woman's biography at this point. :boxedin:



Also, here's another little gem from her secondary website:

"Jackie Barrett is the only psychic medium who's work & assistance has been recognized by Federal Agents, Jackie Barrett is the official psychic consultant to the Federal Government."

I don't even need to say anything.
 
I'm writing an article on Jackie Barrett and her "psychic detective" work. I've been looking for all the information that I can about this woman and I wanted to know if anyone has heard of her or is familiar with her "work". She came in second place in America's Psychic Challenge and was recently featured in the WeTV series "Secret Lives of Women: Psychics." Needless to say, she hasn't applied to take the million dollar challenge.

I don't know anything about Jackie Barrett but I'm curious why you are writing about (to paraphrase you) a second rate hack psychic. What was/is your motivation?
 
I don't know anything about Jackie Barrett but I'm curious why you are writing about (to paraphrase you) a second rate hack psychic. What was/is your motivation?

It's part train wreck fascination and what a train wreck she is. But "psychic detectives" piss me off in general, then to see this woman on national TV "reenacting" a murder scene in front of the dead girl's parents then saying that she's solved over 200 cold cases is just too much.

It's bad enough when a "psychic" takes advantage of vulnerable people, especially those who have lost someone close, it's much worse when they go on TV and lie to an even larger audience about their "abilities". Also, I am a firm believer in the idea that if you say something you need to be able to back it up.

I just read that her seances have been compared to Harry Houdini's. Seriously, she's doing my work for me.
 
Wow, what a piece of work she is. If these people could do what they say – even occasionally – they'd never have to lie. Such blatant lies that are checkable may be a sign of someone who's truly delusional though.
 
It's part train wreck fascination and what a train wreck she is. But "psychic detectives" piss me off in general, then to see this woman on national TV "reenacting" a murder scene in front of the dead girl's parents then saying that she's solved over 200 cold cases is just too much.

It's bad enough when a "psychic" takes advantage of vulnerable people, especially those who have lost someone close, it's much worse when they go on TV and lie to an even larger audience about their "abilities". Also, I am a firm believer in the idea that if you say something you need to be able to back it up.

I just read that her seances have been compared to Harry Houdini's. Seriously, she's doing my work for me.

I was pleased to read what you just wrote. Psychic detectives piss me off in general and I don't cotton to articles being written about them that aren't negative. I suspect you are a student writing a paper. May I suggest you add "a case study in psychic detective woo." Deprive her of your paper being about her. Make your paper about psychic woo with her being the example.
 
I was pleased to read what you just wrote. Psychic detectives piss me off in general and I don't cotton to articles being written about them that aren't negative. I suspect you are a student writing a paper. May I suggest you add "a case study in psychic detective woo." Deprive her of your paper being about her. Make your paper about psychic woo with her being the example.

I'm not a student, I just got hired by a crime writing website (I'm not starting until next year, but I want to get ahead of the game) and I want this to be my first article.

I did my outline last night and it goes a little something like this:

Intro-

*What are psychic detectives?
*What do they claim to be able to accomplish?
High profile "psychic detectives" (Sylvia Browne (reference Shawn Hornbeck case) and Noreen Rainer (reference FBI claims))

Jackie Barrett-

*Destroy credibility
*Services she offers (seances - drug interventions)
Other claims that she makes (Padre Pio, Houdini, everything else she says)
*Psychic detective work (100% track record, 200 cold cases solved, awards given for her work)
*Misc

Law enforcement & psychics-

*FBI disavowing any and all claims made by psychic detectives
*How they can waste valuable police time and side track investigations
*Supporting articles (Klass Kids foundation, John Edward Douglas' site, Skeptic's Dictionary, Crime Library, Project Jason, etc)

Conclusion-

*Psychic detective shows are entertainment, nothing more
*Wasting time, money, and effort
*Taking financial advantage of families, causing emotional harm
*It's a romantic idea, but it's not a reality (Santa Claus)

Additional -- The million dollar challenge!!!! Don't know how I could forget about that.




That's all I have for now. Still no e-mail responses. I can't imagine why....
 
Last edited:
Good for you. I wish I had the nerve to try and make my living through writing (I'm close, I'm thinking about making very little money and become a local newspaper reporter.)

I'm uncertain what a crime writing website is. It seems you have deconstructed the evil of psychic detectives. I wish you the best on your article and your career -- oh what the hell it isn't costing me anything -- I wish you a wonderful life ;)
 
Here is what her website states:

"CHECK OUT JACKIE'S 08' SUPER BOWL PREDICTION IN THE NY POST FEB 1ST


Check out Jackie Barrett's 2008 Super bowl prediction in The New York Post tomorrow Febuary 1st. Jackie has made her prediction check tomorrow's paper to see if your team is on the winning side.

WOW! Just as Jackie said in the February 1st NY Post paper the Giants would win & Patriots score was exactly as Jackie said 14.
QUOTE]


WOW - a 50/50 shot on the winner and a general (2 TD) score on one team. NOBODY can do that! :rolleyes:
I tried a search of the NYP's archives and find no mention of her name.

At work I predicted the score to be 21-17 Pats. I didn't want them to win, but I wanted them to score that last touchdown so I could brag to my co-workers the next day.

Here's an article by former FBI agent Clint Van Zandt
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7320305/
 
Last edited:
Much to my chagrin I'm still plugging away at this article. I've started typing up transcripts of the podcasts that Jackie was a part of. She said that I could do a phone interview with her (that's right, she actually responded to me and I'm actually going to interview her) and I figure I can't say "Uh, you said, somewhere, that you uh, did this. I don't remember where it was or exactly what you said, but uh, you said it!"

Here's a little excerpt with my comments inserted:

Jackie: Exactly. I was in, I had the honor of being in the presence of Padre Pio. Uh, before, before you know he had passed on. And, and I was just, uh, young teenager

Padre Pio died when she was 5.

and I found him amazing, just amazing, and every time I was around him I had this very, um, sleepy, uh, like relaxed feeling, like I used to say "Oh my goodness, I am so relaxed around him."
Cat: Uh huh.
Jackie: You know and-
Cat: So he-
Jackie: Yeah and as I got older I studied different things and now he's a saint. They made him a saint immediately.

Pio died in 1968, he was made a saint in 1997. Not exactly what I would call immediately.

And I, I said wow, I said could it be so. You know, um, I knew, I knew about his stigmatas, um, and of course, the public had doubted that.

Ya know, she can't really claim that she's talking about some other Padre Pio.


I got a suspicious e-mail the other day about this case. Hmmmm....

Btw, when writing a transcript do you really need to write out "uh" "um" "ah"? Cause there are a lot of them.
 
Btw, when writing a transcript do you really need to write out "uh" "um" "ah"? Cause there are a lot of them.

You -could- use an icon that's brown in colour and has a wavy feature above for each "uh" "um" "ah"
 

Back
Top Bottom