RamblingOnwards
Critical Thinker
- Joined
- Mar 21, 2004
- Messages
- 417
*shy wave* Hi everyone!
This is the question that finally caused me to stop lurking and start posing:
To what extent, and in what way, do you personally proselytise skepticism? (I'm asking for advice, as well as purely out of curiosity)
I used to be an uncommitted skeptic - that is, I didn't really believe anything until I investigated it, but I was willing to hold it in my mind as 'maybe true' without much concern. I had friends that believed in auras, astrology, etc. and while I poked fun at the silliest of the ideas, by and large I was willing to at least act like I believed it too.
Over the last couple of years my position has hardened. I now find it silly to believe in things just because it would be nice/scary if they were true (except for faster than light travel and free will. Those you'll have to scrape out of my mind with a rusty spork). I have also grown a lot less tolerant of people who do. I won't even carry on a debate with people who think 'creation science' is a science, and I condemn people who recommend alternative medicine as being immoral - risking the health of others through their own negligence. I just can't bring myself to ignore silly statements the way I used to.
The thing is, I think I was probably doing more to convince people of the value of the scientific method before. Back when I was saying things like "when we're dealing with encounters with ghosts, just be sure that it's not sleep paralysis first" instead of "Ghosts? Well, bring me one documented proof of the existence of ghosts, (no, not that, that's sleep paralysis) and then I'll entertain the concept that they may exist".
So I have a whole bunch of different motives here. I want:
- to educate people about the difference between a 'proof' and a 'basis for belief'.
- to defend the modern scientific method against 'ancient wisdoms'.
- not to be associated with silly concepts.
- not to waste time talking to someone who has already shown all the signs of being an idiot.
(To be clear, I have no issues with someone who states they believe in x through faith and faith alone. I can hold some very interesting conversations with them)
As you can see, some of them are contradictory. How do you handle personal interactions with believers?
This is the question that finally caused me to stop lurking and start posing:
To what extent, and in what way, do you personally proselytise skepticism? (I'm asking for advice, as well as purely out of curiosity)
I used to be an uncommitted skeptic - that is, I didn't really believe anything until I investigated it, but I was willing to hold it in my mind as 'maybe true' without much concern. I had friends that believed in auras, astrology, etc. and while I poked fun at the silliest of the ideas, by and large I was willing to at least act like I believed it too.
Over the last couple of years my position has hardened. I now find it silly to believe in things just because it would be nice/scary if they were true (except for faster than light travel and free will. Those you'll have to scrape out of my mind with a rusty spork). I have also grown a lot less tolerant of people who do. I won't even carry on a debate with people who think 'creation science' is a science, and I condemn people who recommend alternative medicine as being immoral - risking the health of others through their own negligence. I just can't bring myself to ignore silly statements the way I used to.
The thing is, I think I was probably doing more to convince people of the value of the scientific method before. Back when I was saying things like "when we're dealing with encounters with ghosts, just be sure that it's not sleep paralysis first" instead of "Ghosts? Well, bring me one documented proof of the existence of ghosts, (no, not that, that's sleep paralysis) and then I'll entertain the concept that they may exist".
So I have a whole bunch of different motives here. I want:
- to educate people about the difference between a 'proof' and a 'basis for belief'.
- to defend the modern scientific method against 'ancient wisdoms'.
- not to be associated with silly concepts.
- not to waste time talking to someone who has already shown all the signs of being an idiot.
(To be clear, I have no issues with someone who states they believe in x through faith and faith alone. I can hold some very interesting conversations with them)
As you can see, some of them are contradictory. How do you handle personal interactions with believers?