Now even the Federal Prosecutor who got the first "terror trial" conviction has a problem with the Administration's "War on Terror".
08:58 PM CST on Tuesday, February 17, 2004
Associated Press
WASHINGTON – The Justice Department is exaggerating its performance in the war on terrorism and has interfered with a major terrorism prosecution and compromised a confidential informant, a federal prosecutor alleges in an extraordinary lawsuit against Attorney General John Ashcroft.
The lawsuit by Assistant U.S. Attorney Richard Convertino is the latest twist in the Bush administration's first major post-Sept. 11 terrorism prosecution.
Mr. Convertino was the lead prosecutor on the case, in which the government did not provide defense attorneys a letter alleging that a prosecution witness lied until long after a trial had ended.
In his lawsuit, Mr. Convertino says the Justice Department is retaliating against him because he has complained about the department's handling of terrorism cases.
http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcon...roft.4e30f.html
I posted this here
http://www.randi.org/vbulletin/showthread.php?s=&threadid=17820&perpage=40&pagenumber=2
because its part of the first "terror trial" circus, but it is a different and significant enough event to maybe warrant its own thread.
08:58 PM CST on Tuesday, February 17, 2004
Associated Press
WASHINGTON – The Justice Department is exaggerating its performance in the war on terrorism and has interfered with a major terrorism prosecution and compromised a confidential informant, a federal prosecutor alleges in an extraordinary lawsuit against Attorney General John Ashcroft.
The lawsuit by Assistant U.S. Attorney Richard Convertino is the latest twist in the Bush administration's first major post-Sept. 11 terrorism prosecution.
Mr. Convertino was the lead prosecutor on the case, in which the government did not provide defense attorneys a letter alleging that a prosecution witness lied until long after a trial had ended.
In his lawsuit, Mr. Convertino says the Justice Department is retaliating against him because he has complained about the department's handling of terrorism cases.
http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcon...roft.4e30f.html
I posted this here
http://www.randi.org/vbulletin/showthread.php?s=&threadid=17820&perpage=40&pagenumber=2
because its part of the first "terror trial" circus, but it is a different and significant enough event to maybe warrant its own thread.