• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Probability question

gnome said:
You misunderstand... one has been identified as a boy... does it matter if you know he's child "A" or his name is "Tom"... what does that tell you? It's arbitrary.

I didn't misunderstand at all. Reread my answer with this very question in mind.
 
Ok Jellby, I get your point. I made a slight misinterpretation of your original question. Which brings us back to a main theme: the OP is poorly stated. Clearly one has to be very careful in how the problem is stated and in how it is interpreted...
 
I am afraid that my knowledge of statistics not brilliant.

I can understand that if you don't know which child is male then the odds are 1/3, and if you know which child (elder or younger) is male then the odds are 1/2.

If I don't know if it is the elder or youger that is male, I can guess at elder, which changes the odds to 1/2. If I guess younger, that also changes the odds to 1/2.

So I am in the position of having odds of 1/3, but either of the two alternatives available change the odds to 1/2.

What have I missed, or got wrong ?

Dave
 
You missed nothing. You got it. That's exactly what everyone has been arguing like fools for 2 weeks about. Everyone has been arguing over symantics of the original question. You in essence, boiled 2 solid weeks of bickering down into 1 post. Good Job, and everyone else, read Dave_46's post. It it eloquent and if luck, has anything to do with it, this thread is done.
 
Originally posted by Dave_46
I am afraid that my knowledge of statistics not brilliant.

I can understand that if you don't know which child is male then the odds are 1/3, and if you know which child (elder or younger) is male then the odds are 1/2.

If I don't know if it is the elder or youger that is male, I can guess at elder, which changes the odds to 1/2. If I guess younger, that also changes the odds to 1/2.

So I am in the position of having odds of 1/3, but either of the two alternatives available change the odds to 1/2.

What have I missed, or got wrong ?
What you missed is that your two alternatives are not mutually exclusive: if both children are male, then the elder is male and simultaneously the younger is male. So, if you "combine" the two 1/2-probability alternatives because you don't know which holds, yielding a supposed combined probability also of 1/2, you end up counting the overlap twice. Since the probability in the overlap is very high---it's 1, in fact---you end up with a combined probability that's too high: 1/2 instead of the correct 1/3.
 

Back
Top Bottom