Sorry, no way would I spend that ten percent on NASA. Maybe 1 percent. I'm all in favor of a healthy science and research budget but NASA would be way down on my list. I'm far more interested in Inner Space than Outer Space.
Richard Feynman was right on when he said there was "plenty of room at the bottom". We should be spending much more on nanotechnology and subatomic particles then missions to Mars or radio telescopes. I'm far more interested in the development of graphene, silicene carbon nanotubes, Thorium and Fusion. Those things are much more likely to solve global warming and the other issues facing humanity than the stars and planets do.