Kind of interesting that they don't like the Republican, they loved his Democratic predecessor. But then again, they're not "partisan" so much as "obsessed about a single issue".
Krauthammer recently mentioned 'draft Paul Ryan'.
Excuse me, but if you look again at the topic line on this thread, it says "sane" candidtates.
Idiot boy Ryan is still trying to tell us that piddle-down ecconomics is the route to prosperity. How sane is it to go down the same rabbit hole and expect it to be the addit of a gold mine this time?And you make a fine candidate for being the one to decide who is or is not "sane".![]()
Idiot boy Ryan is still trying to tell us that piddle-down ecconomics is the route to prosperity. How sane is it to go down the same rabbit hole and expect it to be the addit of a gold mine this time?
I already did. Piddle down doesn't work. It transfers wealth onlly in one direction, and that is upward.Refer to the other thread and respond to why $0.00 is better than $7.24 per hour first.
Not any more.
ETA: But I don't believe Trump ever was a viable candidate either.
So is it still the Mormon with the socialist health care plan that is the only sane one they have?
Cos he is sooo gonna rock the base!
As they say, in the kingdom of the blind, the one-eyed man is king.
Romney and Huckabee only seem sane and moderate by contrast to the raving lunatics that form the rest of the field.
ETA: Not-as-nutty-as-Trump is an exceptionally low standard!
Totally correct Joe but on the sliding scale of lunacy I put the MittBot ahead of the Huckster. Saw Huckleberry on the Daily Show going on with his endorsment of David Barton as Americas greatest historian.
Havent seen Mitty sink to that level yet.
Howzabout New Jersey's governor, Chris Christie?
Michael