65. The US Supreme Court will agree to hear a major case involving a software patent. They will rule that the patent is invalid, but it will be on much more narrow grounds than the opposition was hoping for.
Whee! I think I can
finally call this one correct!
The court agreed to hear the case on Dec. 6, 2013, so I didn't
quite miss the deadline, even though the final verdict was only reached today.
The patent was indeed ruled invalid.
The only tricky bit is where I said "much more narrow grounds". But the EFF, who filed as amici,
reported: "Admittedly, the Supreme Court
did not offer the clearest guidance on when a patent claims merely an abstract idea, but it did offer guidance that should help to invalidate some of the more egregious software patents out there." (Emphasis mine.)
So, not quite what the opposition was hoping for, but not as utterly useless as my words might have suggested. But the border between "a bit more narrow" and "much more narrow" seems pretty subjective, so I'm going to call it a hit. Actual psychics stretch things a
whole lot farther than that!
