CapelDodger
Penultimate Amazing
Wouldn't argon work better?
Wouldn't butane?
Wouldn't argon work better?
What's wrong with this "psychological study"?
http://jezebel.com/5866602/can-you-tell-the-difference-between-a-mens-magazine-and-a-rapist
I read it and did not see anything glaringly wrong, besides the name of the magazine. I'll try to "tease" it out.
Redundancy? What are you talking about? Did you read the part I highlighted?As glaring examples of idiotic journalism go, I didn't find this redundancy particularly annoying. But I'm having trouble imagining something flat with ripples. Is it flat like a piece of paper with ripples in it?
Redundancy? What are you talking about? Did you read the part I highlighted?
Or are you suggesting that if parallel lines never meet, then the universe is two dimensional?
I read it and did not see anything glaringly wrong, besides the name of the magazine. I'll try to "tease" it out.
Wouldn't butane?
What's wrong with this "psychological study"?
http://jezebel.com/5866602/can-you-tell-the-difference-between-a-mens-magazine-and-a-rapist
Wouldn't butane?
Not to mention the components of rubber that are probably relatively butane-soluble.If you fill your tyres with butane you'll need to keep them above about 30°C otherwise the gas inside will liquify under pressure, effectively deflating the tyre.
...or was that the joke you were making?
Not to mention the components of rubber that are probably relatively butane-soluble.
Also, butane is flammable. a blowout could be really interesting if the tire gets hot enough, or there's a spark from static electricity or whatever.
Not to mention the components of rubber that are probably relatively butane-soluble.