• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Possibility of Ron Paul winning a swing state?

DarthFishy

Graduate Poster
DarthFishy
Joined
Jan 9, 2008
Messages
1,393
DISCLAIMER: I am a not from the USA and while I think Ron Paul winning anything at all in the American Elections would make for entertaining TV I'm not really a supporter. Just using him as an example. (And as a dirty trick to get people to reply to this thread :p).

I'm trying to understand something about the US Elections. As far as I understand in the Elections in November, the votes per state determines which canadidate obtains that states seats in the Electoral College. Right?

Now most states are either mostly Republican or Democrat as I understand, and there are only a number of so-called "Swing States" that are undecided. And thus the states that a candidate needs to win to win the Electoral College.

What I would like to know is, (a) would it be possible for a Third Party Independent, e.g. Ron Paul, to win Swing state and, more importantly (b), could that give him the power within the Electoral College to decide who the Preseident will be? Will the other leading candidates then have to bargain with him to get his vote?

I know similar situations happen in other Countries that have a more proportional representaiton system, i.e. Coalition Governments are formed, but can this happen in the US?

PS. Long time reader first time poster as well :)
 
DarthFishy said:
What I would like to know is, (a) would it be possible for a Third Party Independent, e.g. Ron Paul, to win Swing state and, more importantly (b), could that give him the power within the Electoral College to decide who the Preseident will be? Will the other leading candidates then have to bargain with him to get his vote?

I know similar situations happen in other Countries that have a more proportional representaiton system, i.e. Coalition Governments are formed, but can this happen in the US?

PS. Long time reader first time poster as well :)
Click to expand...

Our election system doesn't work how I think you're describing in your question.



It wouldn't matter how many states ron paul won, unless he won the most. The winner of the election is the one who gets the most electoral college votes which are distributed based on a states population (every state has at least 3 votes).

Ron Paul doesn't get to decide where those votes go.

Often by running however, third party candidates siphon off votes from one or both of the two main party's candidates.

Happened when Ross Perot ran in '92, and Nader in 2000.

Oh, and Ron Paul isn't an independent, he's running as a republican. So he has to win his parties nomination. Though I suppose he could turn third party at anytime, I'm pretty sure he said that he has no desire to do so.

Edit: Oh and "Welcome to the JREF Forums" :-)
 
Last edited:
Ah yes I see. I was thinking more of a Parlimentary system where the President is elected by the MPs. My bad.

Oh, and Ron Paul isn't an independent, he's running as a republican. So he has to win his parties nomination. Though I suppose he could turn third party at anytime, I'm pretty sure he said that he has no desire to do so.
Click to expand...

Yes that's what I meant, that if (most would say when) he doesn't win the nomination he would try as an Independent.

Thanx for the info :)
 
DarthFishy said:
Yes that's what I meant, that if (most would say when) he doesn't win the nomination he would try as an Independent.
Click to expand...


Yeah, that would be interesting... because he holds an office in the House of Representatives as a Republican. So I wonder if he ran as an independent if he would have to change his party affiliation in the House. I really don't know.
 
DarthFishy said:
What I would like to know is, (a) would it be possible for a Third Party Independent, e.g. Ron Paul, to win Swing state
Click to expand...

That is actually two different questions:

1) Is it possible for a third party independent candidate to swing a state? Yes

2) Is it possible for third party independent candidate Ron Paul to do it? No
 
There is a scenerio here. Lets say Ron Paul runs as a Libertarian and somehow wins Florida. At the same time, the two major candidates deadlock and neither wins a majority of electors.

Ron Paul would be in a position of great power at that point.
 
Suddenly said:
There is a scenerio here. Lets say Ron Paul runs as a Libertarian and somehow wins Florida. At the same time, the two major candidates deadlock and neither wins a majority of electors.

Ron Paul would be in a position of great power at that point.
Click to expand...

No greater than any other member of congress. If their is no clear winner from the electoral college the election is decided by the House of Representatives IIRC. You can't "give" your electoral college votes away.
 
Billdave2 said:
No greater than any other member of congress. If their is no clear winner from the electoral college the election is decided by the House of Representatives IIRC. You can't "give" your electoral college votes away.
Click to expand...

Those electors can vote for who they choose. If they refuse to switch and cast votes for Paul the election goes to the house under rules that as far as I can see result in a Republican victory (I believe each state gets one vote). So immediately the game is on for the Democrats to campaign for these handful of electors, and since Ron Paul chose them it would be natural for him to be the point man in such a negotiation.

Which would of course create a massive outcry were the winner not the one with the most popular votes and maybe reform would ensue.

However, this scenerio is somewhat less likely than Martians invading and creating a puppet one-world government headed by Ron Paul....
 
Ron Paul is in the running to win the State of Confusion.
 
Suddenly said:
Those electors can vote for who they choose. If they refuse to switch and cast votes for Paul the election goes to the house under rules that as far as I can see result in a Republican victory (I believe each state gets one vote). So immediately the game is on for the Democrats to campaign for these handful of electors, and since Ron Paul chose them it would be natural for him to be the point man in such a negotiation.

Which would of course create a massive outcry were the winner not the one with the most popular votes and maybe reform would ensue.

However, this scenerio is somewhat less likely than Martians invading and creating a puppet one-world government headed by Ron Paul....
Click to expand...

Actually, it depends. In some states it is illegal for an elector to vote for someone other than the canididate that they stood for on election day. You also have to assume that the electors would do what Ron Paul (or whoever the third party candidate they stood for was) told them to do with their vote if they did change it.

Also, if one of the candidates gets 270 or more votes it doesn't matter.

If the race were thrown to the House, each state's representatives vote to determine their states winner, and then each state votes. There are currently 26 states where the Democrats are the majority, and 21 for the Republicans. This would surely end in a Democratic President regardless of whoever won the popular vote.

In short, even if Ron Paul were to win a state, he would have very little say in what happens.
 
The way things are going,the only way Paul can win anything is if he gets lucky on a trip to Las Vegas.
 
Billdave2 said:
Actually, it depends. In some states it is illegal for an elector to vote for someone other than the canididate that they stood for on election day. You also have to assume that the electors would do what Ron Paul (or whoever the third party candidate they stood for was) told them to do with their vote if they did change it.
Click to expand...
That law can't be enforced and is most likely unconstitutional besides.

Ron Paulies not doing what Ron Paul wants? I think that is even less likely than this whole silly scenerio in the first place...
 
My Galactus/Darksied scenarios are a lot more likely then Ron Paul deciding who wins in 2008.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom