Poll: Should there be a JFK subthread

[NWO Sentryman]

I saw a thread about closing the 9/11 subforum.

And it made me think: Because the JFK assassination gets just as much websites as 9/11, Should we not have a JFK subforum?

 

[JimBenArm]

Nope. The 9/11 subforum was opened because it was swamping all the other conspiracies combined. There isn't enough traffic in JFK stupidity to warrant it, in my not-so-humble opinion.

 

[tuc0]

No, there aren't many threads on JFK. It would be a ghost town.

 

[NWO Sentryman]

well i was on the Education forum, with John Stockwell (apparently the highest ranking CIA Case officer to go public) speaking about the JFK assassination:


The President was perfunctorily warned of the threats against him, but the usual vigilant efforts to protect him were not taken. The Secret Service, FBI, and local police certainly can protect presidents. They do it continuously not only inside the United States but in foreign capitals around the world. Numerous, almost routine, techniques are involved, like bringing extra security forces to blanket problem areas, moving in caravans of cars at a brisk 45 miles an hour, and using, whenever possible, unannounced routes that do not include sharp, slow turns.


educationforum.ipbhost.com/index.php?showtopic=4073

 

[Blender Head]

No, there aren't many threads on JFK. It would be a ghost town.

Correct.

Voted 'no'.

 

[tuc0]

Also, the pay for JFK shills is lousy. Wouldn't touch it with a black umbrella.

 

[NWO Sentryman]

I know. The pay was awful

And very few customers to boot.

Anyways, John Stockwell (albeit in 1990) said some interesting things about JFK in the link i gave.