Ha ha ha ha ha ha !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
UnBELIEVABLE, but not unexpected! I knew that would be your only pathetic comeback!
LoL!!!
So, once again, KT, your entire argument rests upon a single claim: "I don't
think so!" That's it--that's your whole "line of reasoning": "it doesn't look likely to me!" Do you do any research? Do you bother to find out possible reasons for or against your conclusions? No, don't be silly. You already know your conclusions are right--why bother putting them to the test.
O.K., here's something I found in two minutes of googling:
"The conflagration in Hiroshima caused high winds to spring up as air was drawn in toward the center of the burning area, creating a "fire storm". The wind velocity in the city had been less than 5 miles per hour before the bombing, but the fire-wind attained a velocity of 30-40 miles per hour. These great winds restricted the perimeter of the fire but greatly added to the damage of the conflagration within the perimeter and caused the deaths of many persons who might otherwise have escaped. In Nagasaki, very severe damage was caused by fires, but no extensive "fire storm" engulfed the city. In both cities, some of the fires close to X were no doubt started by the ignition of highly combustible material such as paper, straw, and dry cloth, upon the instantaneous radiation of heat from the nuclear explosion. The presence of large amounts of unburnt combustible materials near X, however, indicated that even though the heat of the blast was very intense, its duration was insufficient to raise the temperature of many materials to the kindling point except in cases where conditions were ideal."
Notice that "large amounts of unburnt combustible materials near X." You know what X is, I assume, right? Yes, "ground zero" of a
frikkin' atomic bomb! So--either you are saying that the US never actually dropped an atomic bomb on Hiroshima or Nagasaki, or you are saying that that bomb did not result in a large mushroom cloud, or you are saying that you don't know even one, teensy, tiny thing about the relationship between explosions, fire, and resultant smoke clouds. Guess which one I pick?
So, Killtown, you've been proven wrong yet again. You've been shown once again that you made this vile and slanderous accusation against Val McClatchey on the basis of nothing more than your "gut instinct" and you've been shown that your "gut instinct" is less reliable than random guessing.
Now are you going to apologize to this poor woman, or do you feel you need to have even more shame heaped upon you before you do something to mitigate it?
