Please give evidence for all religions except Christianity

[Mirrorglass]

If I'm reading him right, he's saying that DOC is an embarrasing detail about Christianity.

But wouldn't that mean whoever wrote DOC was telling the truth?

 

[kmortis]

But wouldn't that mean whoever wrote DOC was telling the truth?

I think so. Either that or that once someone admits to knowing DOC they ruin any chance to get elected President.

 

[Akhenaten]

I think so. Either that or that once someone admits to knowing DOC they ruin any chance to get elected President.

But what if he or she were martyred a few times? Wouldn't that be evidence of Sir Luke's knowledge of difficult sayings?

 

[kmortis]

But what if he or she were martyred a few times? Wouldn't that be evidence of Sir Luke's knowledge of difficult sayings?

I'm unsure. I've figured out that embarassing things = truthiness, but I don't think that martyrdom = difficult sayings. I think that martyrdom = Sir Luke is the World's Greatest Historian™.

 

[Akhenaten]

I'm unsure. I've figured out that embarassing things = truthiness, but I don't think that martyrdom = difficult sayings. I think that martyrdom = Sir Luke is the World's Greatest Historian™.

Wow, this theology stuff is a lot harder than it looks.

 

[Mirrorglass]

Wow, this theology stuff is a lot harder than it looks.

Or a lot easier.

 

[Akhenaten]

 

[RoboTimbo]

Point of order!
This is a true Ad Hominem.


Carry on.

I disagree. An ad hom would mean that I was saying that his argument was unsound because of some unrelated personal defect of his. However, it may fall under rule 12 so I'll give him this:

If he will answer my other post with a straightforward, honest YES or NO, I will retract the comment.

 

[joobz]

I disagree.

I threw that out there to be silly. But I do think it can fall into the ad hom category because you are using his flaws as an argument against his position.

What is interesting about that is that you are merely extending his own argument. So, in making your own logical fallacy, you serve to demonstrate that his own position is fallacy ridden.

If he will answer my other post with a straightforward, honest YES or NO, I will retract the comment.

It would be nice to think that he would be courteous enough to answer your question. I hold out hope....

 

[Foster Zygote]

Or a lot easier.

[qimg]http://i30.photobucket.com/albums/c322/Northernme/Calvinball_small.jpg[/qimg]

I'd nominate this post, but I'm not sure about nominating the use of someone else's illustration. The analogy is brilliant, though.

 

[Mirrorglass]

I'd nominate this post, but I'm not sure about nominating the use of someone else's illustration. The analogy is brilliant, though.

You could nominate Bill Watterson, although the comic is some two decades old.

 

[Foster Zygote]

You could nominate Bill Watterson, although the comic is some two decades old.

I suspect he'd get a kick out of its use in this context.

 

[RoboTimbo]

It would be nice to think that he would be courteous enough to answer your question. I hold out hope....

DOC's dishonesty seems to have kept him from answering the questions posed to him.

 

[TubbaBlubba]

If someone runs into my town in 1776 and yells "the British is coming", I'm not going to take the time to criticize the guy on his grammar.

I would assume that there's a British person coming, and point out to him that the correct pronoun is "Briton".

 

[X]

DOC's dishonesty seems to have kept him from answering the questions posed to him.

On the other hand, we've figured out how to get him to stop bumping one of his threads.

 

[RoboTimbo]

On the other hand, we've figured out how to get him to stop bumping one of his threads.

This is the one he doesn't want bumped. It has too much evidence for other religions that is equal to his own.

 

[joobz]

This is the one he doesn't want bumped. It has too much evidence for other religions that is equal to his own.

The OP was not started in earnest.

 

[Dorian Gray]

Hi, I currently have the below thread in the History and Literature forum.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=124603

In that thread which has over 14,000 posts I give some historical and other evidence why I believe Christianity is true. That thread has been closed temporarily. Until the thread is reopened I've decided to have a different thread. In this new thread I would like members of religions "other than Christianity" to give evidence why you believe your religion is true. Thanks

Once again please do not post evidence for Christianity in here.

OP fail. You've requested evidence for religions - religions - other than Xianity. Well, there are literally billions of pieces of evidence of religions other than Xianity.

Assuming you are a Xian, and thus believe in the Bible, then there is evidence of multiple religions there too. Hey, how about the entire Old Testament for example? Jews are God's chosen people, right, and uh, if they're good enough for God, they're good enough for you. God refers to multiple other gods, fully acknowledging their existence provided you put him first. Not a stretch to presume those other people, referred to as 'infidels' and 'unbelievers' and followers of Baal, have religions other than Xianity.

So using your own presumed source (the Bible), there is ample evidence of religions other than Xianity that are 'true', and even God says so.

I mean, you have to admit that Judaism should have been in your title. You totally dropped the ball on that one.

 

[RoboTimbo]

The OP was not started in earnest.

But that would be blatantly dishonest!

 

[kmortis]

But that would be blatantly dishonest!

Yet, throughly in character.