PK parties

[Lucianarchy]

Oh, that's odd. I thought my research had to do with facts, such as Russell Targ has not had a successful experiment in parapsychology ever.

I won't even bother addressing your subjective opinion. But even that does not say anything negative about Targ's honesty or integrity.

 

[Ceinwyn]

First to Ed:

I'm honoured. Yes, it is the Sutton Hoo helmet. If you want to know why I chose it, I've posted about it here before but you can always PM me.

To Luci:

I think my point was made. You cannot rebut your tenuous argument.

Sad for you.

 

[Lucianarchy]

I think my point was made.

Your third hand opinion against evidence to the contrary? Yes, well made.

 

[LettristLoon]

Flyboy:

Just don't let your friends get parted from their spoons, if they can avoid it. I mean, regardless of what they report, it's not a whole lot to go on, unless they bring video cameras and keep them trained on a piece of silverware as it bends. But, eh, it'll enjoy themselves. I hope they'll write a synopsis of their experience and post it here.

Ian:

You're rude. I'm just saying that, so far as I know, the brain can't move ◊◊◊◊ that the body ain't touching. That's all. I hope that clears up any misunderstandings. What's yer beef?

- B

 

[Interesting Ian]

It means the same as "Shut up you ignorant drunkard who has yet to pick up an actual textbook" or "I'm Interesting".

Do not call me a drunkard, do you understand moonbeam?

I repeat: do you understand???.

Secondly, tell me what "neuropsychology" (whatever the f*ck that means) has to do with anything discussed in this thread.

Failure to answer this question I will take as confirmation that neither you, or your comrades in arms Luc and Ed, know what you're talking about.

In which case I suggest you shut the f*ck up.

 

[Interesting Ian]

Good 'un.

You know that that is not what it is about though, right? The "pickled" discipline is Histology, perhaps Ianology too

Hope you haven't got piles Luc.

 

[Interesting Ian]

First, that is a very nice helmet, the BM reconstruction of the example from Sutton Hoo, yes? Did you read Heaney's new translation of Beowulf yet?

To the topic of the moment: It is immensely frustrating dealing with people who have no understanding of the foundations of the current understanding of brain processes.

You cannot use brain processes to vindicate materialism spastic. Any such correlations are equally explicable with transmission theory. How many times do you need to be f*cking told before it sinks into that sub-normal skull of yours??

It is as though one is dealing with a 14th century monk. And to substitute "philosophical" maunderings is simply pathetic and intellectually bankrupt.

Yeah, funny how you always back out of debating the issue.

Thick cretin.

 

[flyboy217]

Flyboy:

Just don't let your friends get parted from their spoons, if they can avoid it.

Right, they've been instructed accordingly. They can and will avoid it.

I mean, regardless of what they report, it's not a whole lot to go on, unless they bring video cameras and keep them trained on a piece of silverware as it bends.

I'm not so worried about videotaping it just yet. If they can do it this once, then they better be able to do it again sometime later, and I can tape it then. Otherwise it's just a parlor trick, "real" or not.

But, eh, it'll enjoy themselves. I hope they'll write a synopsis of their experience and post it here.

Certainly.

 

[Interesting Ian]

Flyboy:

Just don't let your friends get parted from their spoons, if they can avoid it.

I agree that's essential. I somewhat doubt they will bend, but I'm not a Skeptic who a priori rejects any possibility they could bend. If we can't bend spoons by the mind alone, then that's just the way the world is. There is nothing inherently absurd about the idea at all.

.

Ian:

You're rude.

Indeed I am. I like being rude to people. At least those who spew forth vacuous cr@p.

I'm just saying that, so far as I know, the brain can't move ◊◊◊◊ that the body ain't touching. That's all. I hope that clears up any misunderstandings. What's yer beef?

We immediately experience our causal agency. I desire to move my body ( a mental event), then my body moves (a physical event). Why is this not macro-psychokinesis??

 

[Interesting Ian]

Repeat post.

 

[flyboy217]

Would I be presumptive to ask for any video documentation? Oh, heavens no. There will be none forthcoming.

Mr. Houck is sending me a VHS of several of his parties. With his permission, I would like to digitize it and try to find webspace to post it. I'm not sure what it will tell anyone, but maybe it will be interesting.

 

[Lucianarchy]

You cannot use brain processes to vindicate materialism spastic.

Ian, when you sober up, apologise.

You are completely out of order.

[pmod=Paul C. Anagnostopoulos]This post has been reported. I recommend that everyone take it easy.[/pmod]

 

[Interesting Ian]

Originally posted by Interesting Ian


You cannot use brain processes to vindicate materialism spastic.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Ian, when you sober up, apologise.

You are completely out of order.

Ian, when you sober up, apologise.

You are completely out of order. [/B]

Lucianarchy, f*ck right off you complete and unbelievable retard. I dio not need to drink to use the language that I do to people on this board. Try to get that through your f*cking mental retarded skull.

If you want to have a philosophical debate with me, then fine. But don't tell me I'm f*cking wrong without argumentation.

Now f*ck off you complete and unadulterated ars*hole.

 

[Lucianarchy]

Lucianarchy, f*ck right off you complete and unbelievable retard. I dio not need to drink to use the language that I do to people on this board. Try to get that through your f*cking mental retarded skull.

If you want to have a philosophical debate with me, then fine. But don't tell me I'm f*cking wrong without argumentation.

Now f*ck off you complete and unadulterated ars*hole.

I think not.

Ian, how do you think people who are (before the days of PC) 'spastics' feel about that term being used as an insult?

I, otoh, am not calling you a drunkard to insult you. I am merely giving you feedback on your behaviour.

I'd love to have a philosophical debate with you about RPK, but not when you are drunk.

Now, sober up, go to sleep, and apologise.

 

[Interesting Ian]

Ian, when you sober up, apologise.

You are completely out of order.

Your post has been reported. I'm pig sick of dumbf*cks on here insinuating or accusing me of being an alcoholic. Not that they will do f*ck all.

 

[Interesting Ian]

I think not.

Ian, how do you think people who are (before the days of PC) 'spastics' feel about that term being used as an insult?

I, otoh, am not calling you a drunkard to insult you. I am merely giving you feedback on your behaviour.

I'd love to have a philosophical debate with you about RPK, but not when you are drunk.

Now, sober up, go to sleep, and apologise.

You're just as much as a complete dumbf*ck as any of the Skeptics.

Now piss off and don't accuse me of having been drinking.

 

[Lucianarchy]

Your post has been reported. I'm pig sick of dumbf*cks on here insinuating or accusing me of being an alcoholic. Not that they will do f*ck all.

Interesting, Ian, that you used the term 'alcoholic'. I just say that your behaviour here today is that of a common drunkard. An alcoholic has a pattern of use and a dependancy. If other people really are saying such things about you, you would do well to heed their advice. You used to be mildy interesting, yet recently you have turned into what Homer's Odyssey described as a 'rage-aholic'.

 

[Ceinwyn]

I never said anything about you being an alcoholic, Ian.

No, alcoholics generally deserve support and compassion. You're just an offensive drunk with no point to make, so the best you can do is spew insults.

Get it, sunshine?

 

[flyboy217]

You're just as much as a complete dumbf*ck as any of the Skeptics.

Now piss off and don't accuse me of having been drinking.

We have the "woo woos", the "Skeptics", LOTS of drama between the two, and even in-fighting within the "woo woo" clan. Boy, this is a fun forum

 

[flyboy217]

...into what Homer's Odyssey described as a 'rage-aholic'.

Homer's Odyssey? I was under the impression that this was Homer Simpson

"I'm a rageaholic, I just can't live without rageahol!" - Homer Simpson