• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Pizzagate

Nope. I posted a link to a website (I think it was this https://dcpizzagate.wordpress.com/) and then extracted a couple of pics from it to elicit some discussion in this thread that was created by someone else around the same issue. I´m not he one linking them to a conspiracy, that website (and many symilar other sites) do. I´m not slinging mud, I just point at some of the already slung mud. Just like this thead does.
Linking to pictures repeatedly and asking 'aren't they strange?' isn't discussing anything.
If you really wanted to discuss anything, you'd say what you think those pictures mean. As long as you provide no input, there is only one thing to say:

Accusing a person of raping, selling and murdering children because you think their taste in paintings is unusual is nothing more than a witch hunt.
If you have nothing to say about these images and nothing to add or ask, there is nothing to discuss.
 
Nope. I posted a link to a website (I think it was this https://dcpizzagate.wordpress.com/) and then extracted a couple of pics from it to elicit some discussion in this thread that was created by someone else around the same issue. I´m not he one linking them to a conspiracy, that website (and many symilar other sites) do. I´m not slinging mud, I just point at some of the already slung mud. Just like this thead does.

Of course you are slinging mud, it just happens to be mud that you picked up after someone else slung it.
You haven't offered much of any personal opinion on it but what you have offered indicates sympathy for the opinions on such sites rather than disgust at it being the false news, uneducated, untrained, speculation that it is.

You ARE part of the problem.
 
Is that a joke?

Anyway, look what I found. Weird, innit?

https://twitter.com/AndrewBreitbart/status/33636278100561920
[qimg]http://i63.tinypic.com/2qvtjx4.png[/qimg]

There seems to be something "horrifying" in their bedroom walls:

"Folks attending a house tour in the Lake Barcroft neighborhood in Falls Church earlier this year got an eyeful when they walked into a bedroom at the Podesta residence hung with multiple color pictures by Katy Grannan, a photographer known for documentary-style pictures of naked teenagers in their parents' suburban homes.
"They were horrified," Heather recalls, a grin spreading across her face."


from: https://archive.is/vddrO

You don´t seem to understant CT-s. You can draw any conclusions you want. Just pointing our that something is weird is rather meaningles. And if you tell me that I just did that, in my earlier post about Breitbart´s tweet, I think in that case the conclusion, or the context is quite obvious, isn´t it?

You should distinguish between nutters on reddit who are convinced this CT is real and call for vigilante actions, or trolls who create false evidence, or hackers who publish people´s personal photos etc. and us, who just point at some of the already published material in this skeptics forum and just want to see how it gets debunked. Completely different.

Really? In the above, point out where you asked for how this is debunked.
 
Rubbish.
He was always considered "odd"...it was a joke at school when I was a kid for crying out loud.
No one was actually surprised.
Certainly no-one who knew him or had worked with him. Hell Val McDermid based Wire in the Blood on him.
 
Really? In the above, point out where you asked for how this is debunked.
No need to ask, it comes as a standard, in this forum. If I wanted support from conspiracy theorists I´d post in burbuja.info, for example (a Spanish forum very fond of CT-s. Quite entertaining.)
 
It was intrepid debunker Abooga, or those like him, that drew attention of the MIB to the egregious nature of the whistleblowers on redditt.;)

I never posted on reddit, I only brought some of reddit´s material to the pizzagate thread in this forum. To see if anyome had anything interesting to say about it. It was all quite predictable, however.
 
Of course you are slinging mud, it just happens to be mud that you picked up after someone else slung it.
You haven't offered much of any personal opinion on it but what you have offered indicates sympathy for the opinions on such sites rather than disgust at it being the false news, uneducated, untrained, speculation that it is.

You ARE part of the problem.

No.
 
No it doesn't. The reaction comes normally, but not the request. You think bigfooters coming here are asking for us to debunk their nonsense? No, they're here to preach.

Well, I´m not.

I get this a lot in this forum, I´m not a believer in woo, but people often assume I am because I´m not vociferously attacking it all the time. Oh well...
 
"No. I'm posting baseless accusations and pictures, calling them 'weird' and implying that something shady is going on, but I'm in no way contributing to the baseless accuation itself."

Right, sure. Whatever.

Let me remind you that I didn´t accuse anyone of anything. Some of you infer it but that´s just that, assumptions.

But let´s not get sidetracked by talking about me. Let´s see if anything new comes up about pizzagate...
 
I never posted on reddit, I only brought some of reddit´s material to the pizzagate thread in this forum. To see if anyome had anything interesting to say about it. It was all quite predictable, however.
"Here is a picture of a painting, weird, isn't it?"
"Not really, and why are you linking to a site that accuses the owner of this painting of rape?"
"Don't ask me, I'm just wondering if you can debunk this."
"Debunk what? It's a painting."
"Don't ask me, I'm just curious. Here is another painting, weird, isn't it?"
"Still not weird. Are you accusing the owner of this painting of raping kids and hiding clues in his restaurant, like the people on the site you're linking to are doing?"
"Stop attacking me. Here is another painting, isn't it suspicious?"
"What in the seven hells is suspicious about it?"
"Don't ask me, I'm just posting the link. your replies are very predictable, I'm disappointed nobody is debunking this."

Either post something concrete, or stop sending us random context free links to a smear campaign if you're not going to discuss it.
 
"Here is a picture of a painting, weird, isn't it?"
"Not really, and why are you linking to a site that accuses the owner of this painting of rape?"
"Don't ask me, I'm just wondering if you can debunk this."
"Debunk what? It's a painting."
"Don't ask me, I'm just curious. Here is another painting, weird, isn't it?"
"Still not weird. Are you accusing the owner of this painting of raping kids and hiding clues in his restaurant, like the people on the site you're linking to are doing?"
"Stop attacking me. Here is another painting, isn't it suspicious?"
"What in the seven hells is suspicious about it?"
"Don't ask me, I'm just posting the link. your replies are very predictable, I'm disappointed nobody is debunking this."

Either post something concrete, or stop sending us random context free links to a smear campaign if you're not going to discuss it.

LOL

It sounds quite funny now that you put it that way:D

But as I said, that´s enough about talking about me. I´ll try to present things in a more "discussion-shaped" and formal way next time.
 
How in the hell do you get from "This Tony guy looks sketchy" to "A pizza place his brother had some parties at is a pedophile ring"

Seriously, what are the intermediate steps?

I'm assuming you must have missed the part about the yellow necklace. That pretty much sealed the deal for me.

At least as far as my opinion of someone who has a deep knowledge of deviant sexual activities and outsider art almost on par with our cataclysmic simian friend, but with obvious overtones of shame and self loathing that are a bit off putting.
 

Back
Top Bottom