Physical evidence that a plane did NOT hit the Pentagon

[gumboot]

That's a lame hypothetical generalization.

I brought back proof that the plane flew on the north side of the gas station.

I am not making this up.

Now we know why the damage is so cookie cutter and anomalous and there was so little debris.

The eyewitnesses have definitively confirmed the suspicions.

Your "evidence" is laughable and self-debunking. No one except you and your little team actually think the evidence says what you think it says.

-Gumboot

 

[Lyte Trip]

What are you talking about?




So it's impossible for the plane to have caused any damage to the generator outside?

Coming from the north of the citgo and for the damage to be as it was..........yes.

 

[chippy]

Coming from the north of the citgo and for the damage to be as it was..........yes.

Well we know for sure that something damaged the generator. So what did it?

 

[gumboot]

You do not know nor can you prove there was a basement in the E ring.

Can't I?

Read

The first number or letter indicates the floor on which the room is located
(B = Basement, M = Mezzanine, 1-5 = floors).

The next letter is the ring on which the room is located.
(Rings are designated A,B,C,D, and E for the Mezzanine and floors 1-5 plus the
additional rings F and G in the basement only.)

The basement has more rings than the above ground floors, not less.

-Gumboot

 

[Pardalis]

If we add all the posts in all the threads Lyte has started, I think he's got Christophera beat.

 

[Lyte Trip]

Your "evidence" is laughable and self-debunking. No one except you and your little team actually think the evidence says what you think it says.

-Gumboot

You are quite wrong.

It is quite clear that the plane was on the north of the citgo. Rational unbiased people that watch this testimony can only agree.

 

[Pardalis]

It is quite clear that the plane was on the north of the citgo. Rational unbiased people that watch this testimony can only agree.

You, Merc and who else?

 

[gumboot]

You are quite wrong.

It is quite clear that the plane was on the north of the citgo. Rational unbiased people that watch this testimony can only agree.

In my experience rational unbiased people who watch you video tend to laugh at it and get bored after about 30 seconds.

The Pentacon is one of the worst 9/11 films I have ever seen. I hesitate to call it a film.

-Gumboot

 

[AZCat]

You are quite wrong.

It is quite clear that the plane was on the north of the citgo. Rational unbiased people that watch this testimony can only agree.

I suppose you use this as your test to determine whether or not someone is rational and unbiased? And anyone who does not agree with your interpretation is irrational and biased?

 

[Lyte Trip]

Can't I?

Read



The basement has more rings than the above ground floors, not less.

-Gumboot

Interesting.

So now I suppose I should simply use the term "1st floor" instead of foundation.

Semantics.

You guys are obsessed with it.

 

[A W Smith]

Thanks for debunking yourself lyte

You never answered my question Lyte. Wheres the crater from the blast? any explosion thats going to have enough force to demolish a two foot thick wall and cut it clean off its foundation at grade is most certainly going to leave a blast crater in that slab or foundation. Where the hell is it? Your photos are now proof that a plane flew into the building.

 

[chippy]

Lyte, what damaged the generator?

 

[Lyte Trip]

In my experience rational unbiased people who watch you video tend to laugh at it and get bored after about 30 seconds.

The Pentacon is one of the worst 9/11 films I have ever seen. I hesitate to call it a film.

-Gumboot

Yes we know that real evidence is "boring".

Apparently you only watched 30 seconds of it anyway.

We didn't do this to make a "film" that would be critiqued as to how entertaining it is.

We are the first ever to present actual eyewitnesses to the plane filmed on location.

It's not our fault that they happened to prove the official story a lie.

 

[gumboot]

Interesting.

So now I suppose I should simply use the term "1st floor" instead of foundation.

Semantics.

You guys are obsessed with it.

...

That's a bit more than semantics...

Is "roof" and "wall" semantics?

Or how about "horse" and "dog"? Just words, right?

-Gumboot

 

[Lyte Trip]

Lyte, what damaged the generator?

It was probably partially prefabricated and then finished off with explosives.

Perhaps it was even moved in advance or simply blown in that direction.

 

[gumboot]

Yes we know that real evidence is "boring".

Apparently you only watched 30 seconds of it anyway.

No, I watched the entire thing.

We didn't do this to make a "film" that would be critiqued as to how entertaining it is.

Who said anything about entertainment?

We are the first ever to present actual eyewitnesses to the plane filmed on location.

It's not our fault that they happened to prove the official story a lie.

You do realise all of your witnesses contradict your own claims, yes?

For your claims to be true all of your witnesses have to be lying...

-Gumboot

 

[chippy]

Yes we know that real evidence is "boring".

Apparently you only watched 30 seconds of it anyway.

We didn't do this to make a "film" that would be critiqued as to how entertaining it is.

We are the first ever to present actual eyewitnesses to the plane filmed on location.

It's not our fault that they happened to prove the official story a lie.

If that's the case, then why hasn't this hit the mainstream media, or any form of media?

 

[Pardalis]

Lyte, let's assume you have a valid hypothesis:

"They staged the damage to the Pentagon."

Now, how are you going to test that hypothesis?

How did they do it? What is the positive evidence for it?

 

[chippy]

It was probably partially prefabricated and then finished off with explosives.

Perhaps it was even moved in advance or simply blown in that direction.

In other words, you do not know for sure and have to assume these things so that they fit your version of the truth, correct?

I might add that an explosion of the magnitude that could take that big of a gouge out of the generator would most certainly have been visible on the security footage. It was not visible.

 

[Lyte Trip]

...

That's a bit more than semantics...

Is "roof" and "wall" semantics?

Or how about "horse" and "dog"? Just words, right?

-Gumboot

No.

It's semantics because the engine of the plane would STILL cause damage to the 1st floor as it would the foundation.

In fact it would probably cause more damage right? Obviously the first floor with a basement underneath it wouldn't be as strong as the foundation against the ground. It would probably break through.