I avoided creating a specific thread from the old Loch Ness one, because many of the arguments on both sides were applicable across cryptozoology as a whole. But here's a nice specific "oh noes big catz!!!11!!" newspaper article, based on a recent FOIA enquiry. The resources apparently being squandered on this nonsense (helicopters are not cheap to operate!) make me quite sick:
http://scotlandonsunday.scotsman.com/scotland.cfm?id=421482007
This quote from what I like to call a "properzoologist" is my favourite:
If we get any interest in a general discussion on whether there are significant numbers of exotic cats running wild in the UK (or any other country), I'll dig out the relevant bits of the old thread.
http://scotlandonsunday.scotsman.com/scotland.cfm?id=421482007
This quote from what I like to call a "properzoologist" is my favourite:
"I've heard of people accumulating evidence in their freezers at home. But so far no-one has come forward. Until we get hard evidence it's impossible to say conclusively whether there are big cats are in Scotland," said Kitchener.
"We keep hearing about these bodies, which later disappear. Any footprints we've examined have always had a different explanation, often that of a dog.
"I've read newspaper reports of alleged big cat sightings. But people are actually describing the Scottish wild cat. They don't realise the animal is significantly bigger than the domestic cat.
"I am not suggesting that people are making this up. But it's difficult for people to accurately identify animals when looking at them in the distance in the dark."
If we get any interest in a general discussion on whether there are significant numbers of exotic cats running wild in the UK (or any other country), I'll dig out the relevant bits of the old thread.
