• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Ed Pentagon - TruthMakesPeace

NoahFence said:
I think its between 17 and 20 seconds when he says it:

"....Close up inspection, there's no evidence of an airplane crashing anywhere near the Pentagon, the only site is the actual side of the building its crashed in...."
Click to expand...


People can see how that sloppily paraphrased sentence continued. I'll leave you jokers alone again, it's just absurd. Unless Oystein manages to alter the yt video and point me to a timestamp where "the guy" says what Oystein claims he said.
 
There's also the curious case of the diesel generator that appears to have been clipped by the incoming plane. Damage to the generator and the surrounding fence match what one might expect if a commercial airliner's engine tried to move through the same space at high velocity.

The damaged end of the generator is also angled toward the Pentagon, which is what one might expect if a significant force were applied in the direction of the Pentagon. It is in complete contradiction to what one might expect if the significant force had originated from the building instead.

http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/ats/pentagon757/generator-gouge-small.jpg
http://thewebfairy.com/killtown/images/flight77/generator/tg_fmkneel.jpg
http://911review.com/errors/pentagon/imgs/generator_fence1.jpg
http://911review.com/errors/pentagon/imgs/diesel_generator2.jpg
http://i54.tinypic.com/6hkbo8.jpg
http://www.rense.com/general65/earlyPentagonC.jpg
 
Childlike Empress said:
I must have missed this in the 58 second video. Help me, at what timestamp did he say that it smashed into the Pentagon, Oystein?
Click to expand...

Oh what the heck...

He says it twice:

0:19-0:28: "There is no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the Pentagon. The only sight is the actual side of the building that's crashed in" (emphasis is original)

0:40-0:46: "...which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the side of the Pentagon and then caused the side to collapse".

Please acknowledge.
Remember he replied specifically to the question "...an eyewitness who said it appeared that that Boeing 757, the American Airlines jet, landed short of the Pentagon" (emphasis is original).

Do you know what "short of the Pentagon" means, versus "into the side of the building"?
 
Childlike Empress said:
The obvious absence of a crashed Boing 757. Now the timestamp, Oystein.
Click to expand...

I'm sorry, was mine not good enough?

You do realize in the video you want the timestamp from, the reporter states that there are no pieces larger than what you can carry with your hands, right? And you're looking for intact wings or something?

Dude, you contradict yourself.
 
Childlike Empress said:
The obvious absence of a crashed Boing 757. Now the timestamp, Oystein.
Click to expand...

The Boeing would be inside the building, and smashed into many small pieces. That particular video is of very bad quality, with effective pixels larger than a truck and darker than dung. You would have to expect to not see any plane parts inside the building.

Honestly: Can you see any objects other than plane parts inside the Pentagon in that video?
 
Childlike Empress said:
People can see how that sloppily paraphrased sentence continued. I'll leave you jokers alone again, it's just absurd. Unless Oystein manages to alter the yt video and point me to a timestamp where "the guy" says what Oystein claims he said.
Click to expand...

I only paraphrase verbatim. :D

Tell me honestly - do you want the "truth" or are you just interested in being right?
 
Childlike Empress said:
Hahaha. I hope for you that you're kidding.
Click to expand...

I am not.
Please acknowledge, or correct my quote.#

ETA: And cut out the dramatics, please. Your info-starved snide posts become boring and tedious quickly.
 
Last edited:
Oystein said:
I am not.
Please acknowledge, or correct my quote.
Click to expand...


I'll complete your dishonestly butchered quote. Shame on you.

guy said:
... as I said, the only pieces left, that you can see, are small enough that you can pick up in your hand .. uh ... there are no large tail sections, wing sections ... uh ... fuselage, nothing like that anywhere around ...
Click to expand...
Oystein said:
0:40-0:46: "...which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the side of the Pentagon and then caused the side to to collapse"
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
... as I said, the only pieces left, that you can see, are small enough that you can pick up in your hand .. ah ... there are no large tail sections, wing sections ... ah ... fuselage, nothing like that anywhere around ...
Click to expand...

Which proves.....what exactly? That the plane was going really, really fast?
 
Childlike Empress said:
I'll complete your dishonestly butchered quote. Shame on you.
Click to expand...

"anywhere around" ... where, CE? Did the guy step into the burning inferno to search for plane parts? Would you expect him to?
Or what was, again, the question he replied to? Wasn't it about the plane allegedly landing short of the Pentagon? So Where do you think he was looking? Inside or outside?

Dishonest? Me? Nuh. Someone else. *here's looking at you, kid*
 
Cl1mh4224rd said:
There's also the curious case of the diesel generator that appears to have been clipped by the incoming plane. Damage to the generator and the surrounding fence match what one might expect if a commercial airliner's engine tried to move through the same space at high velocity.

The damaged end of the generator is also angled toward the Pentagon, which is what one might expect if a significant force were applied in the direction of the Pentagon. It is in complete contradiction to what one might expect if the significant force had originated from the building instead.

http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/ats/pentagon757/generator-gouge-small.jpg
http://thewebfairy.com/killtown/images/flight77/generator/tg_fmkneel.jpg
http://911review.com/errors/pentagon/imgs/generator_fence1.jpg
http://911review.com/errors/pentagon/imgs/diesel_generator2.jpg
http://i54.tinypic.com/6hkbo8.jpg
http://www.rense.com/general65/earlyPentagonC.jpg
Click to expand...


You can see it burning in the first video. That's where most of the smoke is coming from. Also here - pay attention to the smoke:
 
Childlike Empress said:
You can see it burning in the first video. That's where most of the smoke is coming from. Also here - pay attention to the smoke:
Click to expand...

So you acknowledge the generator was struck. Well, we're getting someplace now.

Are you under the impression that whatever caused the generator to blow up, also caused the massive hole in the side of the Pentagon?
 
Calling me kid and child won't strenghten your blatant lack of arguments. It's in plain sight: No 757 hit the Pentagon. I'll leave you with April Gallup's testimony - you know I don't play your games anymore. Maybe cicorp will show up.

 
Childlike Empress said:
Calling me kid and child won't strenghten your blatant lack of arguments. It's in plain sight: No 757 hit the Pentagon. I'll leave you with April Gallup's testimony - you know I don't play your games anymore. Maybe cicorp will show up.

Click to expand...


Another video from someone who couldn't see aircraft parts.

Fella - the thing was smashed to small pieces, and I'm sure she was getting the heck out of dodge, so she wasn't looking for parts, either. Not only that, but you may have noticed the raging inferno at the site where the aircraft parts inside the building would have been.

Ok then (Sorry, I just don't feel like typing your whole handle) anyway -

Where'd the bodies of the passengers and the aircraft parts come from?

You can't say they were planted, because emergency workers, civilians and hundreds of other people with video cameras were there within minutes. Someone would have seen it.
They couldn't have been planted inside the building, because there was a raging inferno there.

So how'd they get at the site?
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom