Ed Pentagon - TruthMakesPeace

dafydd said:
It would have been easier just to fly planes into the buildings.
Click to expand...

Captain_Swoop said:
It would have been easier to use a shredder.
Click to expand...

I spent some time as a civilian on a military base where secret communications were commonplace. Every morning two uniformed men would come out of the Ops building with bags of shredded paper. They would load them into an incinerator and light them up. They would stay there until all the a paper was consumed. I was told by an officer not to approach these men. I was told that I may only be trying to be friendly on my morning walk but if I approached or spoke to them that I would be escorted from the base and my superiors would be told that I must be replaced.

Shredding is not the end all and be all of destruction of docuements, but shredding and burning IS! hardly seems efficient or mandatory to destroy entire buildings to destroy a few pages of docuements.
 
NoahFence said:
cicorp - how do you respond to the fact that the pilot of a c130 shadowed AA77 and reported it hitting the Pentagon? AA77 was in full view of that pilot for a long, long time.
Click to expand...
Please specify "long, long time". Minutes? hours?

Are you under the impression that the pilot is unable to differentiate between an unmanned drone and a massive 757 with AA markings on it, in the middle of a beautiful day with no clouds in sight?
Click to expand...

It all depends on how careful the painters were to make an unmanned, remote controlled 757, packed with explosives, painted to look like an official American Airlines 757. If there were dummies in the cockpit, they would be hard to see anyway from the distance the C130 was.

If the explosions went off in the final second, or fraction of a second, before impact, that would be hard for the human eye to detect, from any distance. The explosions would blow off the wings, engines, tail, and turn a big plane in to small bits. That explains the small hole and why Army Major General Albert Stubblebine said "the plane does not fit in that hole!"
 
Last edited:
cicorp said:
Please specify "long, long time". Minutes? hours?



It all depends on how careful the painters were to make an unmanned, remote controlled 757, packed with explosives, painted to look like an official American Airlines 757. If there were dummies in the cockpit, they would be hard to see anyway from the distance the C130 was.

If the explosions went off in the final second, or fraction of a second, before impact, that would be hard for the human eye to detect, from any distance. The explosions would blow off the wings, engines, tail, and turn a big plane in to small bits. That explains the small hole and why Army Major General Albert Stubblebine said "the plane does not fit in that hole!"
Click to expand...

I understand where you're coming from. as one of the Truther kind commented on this Youtube video of WTC7
Just because you don't see explosives or demolition devises, does not mean they don't exist.
Click to expand...


Keep up the logical thinking like this. It's sure to lead to the truth!!!!!!!!!
 
cicorp said:
Please specify "long, long time". Minutes? hours?



It all depends on how careful the painters were to make an unmanned, remote controlled 757, packed with explosives, painted to look like an official American Airlines 757. If there were dummies in the cockpit, they would be hard to see anyway from the distance the C130 was.

If the explosions went off in the final second, or fraction of a second, before impact, that would be hard for the human eye to detect, from any distance. The explosions would blow off the wings, engines, tail, and turn a big plane in to small bits. That explains the small hole and why Army Major General Albert Stubblebine said "the plane does not fit in that hole!"
Click to expand...

Proving that Major Generals can be complete idiots.
 
cicorp said:
It all depends on how careful the painters were to make an unmanned, remote controlled 757, packed with explosives, painted to look like an official American Airlines 757. If there were dummies in the cockpit, they would be hard to see anyway from the distance the C130 was.

If the explosions went off in the final second, or fraction of a second, before impact, that would be hard for the human eye to detect, from any distance. The explosions would blow off the wings, engines, tail, and turn a big plane in to small bits. That explains the small hole and why Army Major General Albert Stubblebine said "the plane does not fit in that hole!"
Click to expand...

Good Lord, not this crap again. Mind explaining how all of this took place?
 
cicorp said:
Please specify "long, long time". Minutes? hours?



It all depends on how careful the painters were to make an unmanned, remote controlled 757, packed with explosives, painted to look like an official American Airlines 757. If there were dummies in the cockpit, they would be hard to see anyway from the distance the C130 was.

If the explosions went off in the final second, or fraction of a second, before impact, that would be hard for the human eye to detect, from any distance. The explosions would blow off the wings, engines, tail, and turn a big plane in to small bits. That explains the small hole and why Army Major General Albert Stubblebine said "the plane does not fit in that hole!"
Click to expand...

I always love truther appeals to authority. You left out RETIRED and BAT **** CRAZY.

this guy thinks he can walk through walls. he thinks he can kill you by thinking hard enough to stop your heart. He believes he is a jedi knight.

By all means, keep on using those appeals to authority.
 
NoahFence said:
cicorp - how do you respond to the fact that the pilot of a c130 shadowed AA77 and reported it hitting the Pentagon? AA77 was in full view of that pilot for a long, long time.

Are you under the impression that the pilot is unable to differentiate between an unmanned drone and a massive 757 with AA markings on it, in the middle of a beautiful day with no clouds in sight?
Click to expand...



cicorp said:
Please specify "long, long time". Minutes? hours?



It all depends on how careful the painters were to make an unmanned, remote controlled 757, packed with explosives, painted to look like an official American Airlines 757. If there were dummies in the cockpit, they would be hard to see anyway from the distance the C130 was.

If the explosions went off in the final second, or fraction of a second, before impact, that would be hard for the human eye to detect, from any distance. The explosions would blow off the wings, engines, tail, and turn a big plane in to small bits. That explains the small hole and why Army Major General Albert Stubblebine said "the plane does not fit in that hole!"
Click to expand...
This reply perfectly demonstrates the second line of my sig.

Well done cicorp


 
Last edited:
TruthersLie said:
I always love truther appeals to authority. You left out RETIRED and BAT **** CRAZY.

this guy thinks he can walk through walls. he thinks he can kill you by thinking hard enough to stop your heart. He believes he is a jedi knight.

By all means, keep on using those appeals to authority.
Click to expand...

Can he kill goats by staring at them?
 
cicorp said:
... make an unmanned, remote controlled 757, packed with explosives, painted to look like an official American Airlines 757. If there were dummies in the cockpit, they would be hard to see anyway from the distance the C130 was.

... Major General Albert Stubblebine said "the plane does not fit in that hole!"
Click to expand...
LOL, this is cool, you are going to pack a 757 with explosives when the jet fuel alone is equal in heat to 200 to 300 TONS of TNT. You need to figure out energy, jet fuel has 10 times the energy of TNT, this is why we use jet fuel instead of TNT to make our planes fly. Like bringing a knife to a gun fight, you don't need explosives when you use mass and velocity to form a kinetic energy weapon, and enough jet fuel to start massive fires hundreds of times over.

In addition, explosives cause death due to the explosion; no deaths by explosives, no blast effects at the Pentagon.

At the Pentagon after a complete study was done, it was found a 757 cause the damage due to kinetic energy and the fires caused by the jet fuel initiating office fires.

Major Gen Stubblebine made up lies about OKC bombing too, a failed patriot, you need to use logic and critical thinking before falling for and propagating the lies of Stubblebine. Does he get anything right?
 
cicorp said:
That explains the small hole and why Army Major General Albert Stubblebine said "the plane does not fit in that hole!"
Click to expand...

Because, as we all know, the only way to determine the truth is to formulate hypotheses to explain (a) things that never happened and (b) uninformed comments by uninvolved outsiders.

Dave
 
OK so the Drone was the same type of aircraft that was supposedto have hit anyway?
Why not just use the aircraft that was supposed to have hit? It would make things so much easier.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom