Paul McCartney is Aleister Crowley.

Elizabeth I said:
How could "Yentraccm Luap" sound anything like "Ian Iachimoe"?

And are you seriously suggesting that these two people look anything alike?
Click to expand...

Watch the video, I gave the time-frame for the comparison. In those pictures, no, they don't look alike because that picture of Paul is before 1966. Also, the video gives the audio of Paul McCartney being said backward. I reversed it myself, that's indeed what it sounds like, that's why "Paul" made it it one of his many aliases.
 
Last edited:
wollclark said:
Also, the video gives the audio of Paul McCartney being said backward. I reversed it myself, that's indeed what it sounds like, that's why "Paul" made it it one of his many aliases.
Click to expand...

It will all depend on how you say it. "Ian Iachimoe" is not a real name, so there is no natural way it is pronounced. With so many vowels in the spelling, it's not clear at all how someone would 'really' pronounce it. A better way to say this is that "Yentraccm Luap" could be said to sound like some pronunciations of "Ian Iachimoe" but not others. I sure you've been selective in which pronunciations you're using.
 
Scott Sommers said:
So I'm watching iamaphoney's video and aside from pointing to some sort of compulsive problem, it does not appear to me to be entirely correct.

At 29:17, the video states that' "The jury in his trial found that he had brainwashed 4 people..." The jury found nothing of the sort. The jury found Mason guilty of murder and conspiracy. I am a PhD candidate in Educational Psychology and I have no idea what brainwashing means much less how Charles Manson could have done it.

At 29:48, there's a clip of a conversation from the 2004 film Helter Skelter where it's stated that, "Charlie got all his beliefs from two places: the Bible and the Beatles." However, Manson himself in a 1961 arrest stated that his religion was Scientology. There is a vast literature on Charles Manson and I am familiar with only bits of this, but the idea that of linking Manson and the Beatles like this is bizarre and certainly not located in fact. But this is what you get when you rely on clips from Hollywood films as your reference sources.

By the time I got to 38:20 and it was telling me about pictures hidden in album covers and secret numbers everywhere, I'd had it. Clip after clip of the Beatles denying the rumor is supposed to leave us believing something sinister is afoot, but all it does is remind me of Jammonious showing us clips of planes crashing in to WTC buildings as proof that no planes hit the towers.

I made it to about 45 minutes, but that's all I could do. However, as one of the Youtube comments said, it certainly was entertaining...not much to believe there, but it was pretty cool to listen to.
Click to expand...

I fairly certain I'm wrong due to the spiritual, magick nature to it, but something in me tells me it's possible, that's the gullibility I was talking about. I entertained the thought of me possibly being a paranoid schizophrenic last night, but I've never heard voices. Though the morning after I watched this I heard some noises and the creepy factor messed with me but I figured it was nothing. Also, I see people who aren't there out of the corner of my eye, it comes and goes, has since I was a small child.
 
wollclark said:
Watch the video, I gave the time-frame for the comparison. In those pictures, no, they don't look alike because that picture of Paul is before 1966.
Click to expand...
What does that have to do with anything?


Also, the video gives the audio of Paul McCartney being said backward. I reversed it myself, that's indeed what it sounds like, that's why "Paul" made it it one of his many aliases.
Click to expand...

Scott Sommers said:
It will all depend on how you say it. "Ian Iachimoe" is not a real name, so there is no natural way it is pronounced. With so many vowels in the spelling, it's not clear at all how someone would 'really' pronounce it. A better way to say this is that "Yentraccm Luap" could be said to sound like some pronunciations of "Ian Iachimoe" but not others. I sure you've been selective in which pronunciations you're using.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...
How could a name with no "l" in it sound like a name with an "l" in it? And how could a name with no long "o" in it sound like a name with a long "o" (as in moe)?


wollclark said:
I fairly certain I'm wrong due to the spiritual, magick nature to it, but something in me tells me it's possible, that's the gullibility I was talking about. I entertained the thought of me possibly being a paranoid schizophrenic last night, but I've never heard voices. Though the morning after I watched this I heard some noises and the creepy factor messed with me but I figured it was nothing. Also, I see people who aren't there out of the corner of my eye, it comes and goes, has since I was a small child.
Click to expand...
You're a troll and a Poe, aren't you? Good-bye.
 
If you're really concerned about this, I would see a doctor. But there are lots of other people who believe strange things for reasons other than mental illness. Strange things can be fun and entertaining. You don't want to be confusing the entertainment value that comes from the idea that something could be possible with the idea that this makes it true or even likely. That's what I meant in my post that the video was fun to watch for a while, but when it started making silly claims, it lost the fun feeling that I was watching it for.

This can be confusing when you first thinking about these sorts of issues, especially if you don't have good teachers to help you with it. But if you are worried about hallucinations, I'd go talk with a doctor.
 
Elizabeth I said:
You're a troll and a Poe, aren't you? Good-bye.
Click to expand...

I assure you I'm not a troll or a "poe" (I haven't heard that term before). I'm self-aware of my cognitive dissonance but don't know how to shed certain beliefs or my innate ability to create or believe insane things due to my constant anxieties of "What if?". What you call being a troll I call me being *possibly* mentally unstable. I don't have the money to find such a thing out, but I'd be too scared I'd be kept against my will anyway.

ETA: Also, I'm from Alabama.
 
Last edited:
wollclark said:
The image of Aiwass or Lam is a sketch drawn by Crowley, the "I WAS" picture was taken from the Magical Mystery Tour movie, and album booklet. The bird is taken from the Lamen of Thelema which was founded by Crowley.
Click to expand...
I see, thank you for clarifying this. In your OP you just mentioned these pictures being shown in the video, without explaining the context.


wollclark said:
The man who replaced Paul looks similar, if Crowley did indeed invoke this being (by sexual ritual) then perhaps Paul is Lam, the son of Osiris. The son of Osiris is also known as "The Fool".

The Fool on the Hill
Click to expand...

I love Egyptian mythology and I've read all the books about it I could find, but I have never come across any account of Osiris having a son, and I don't remember an Egyptian deity called Lam. I can't find him on any online lists of Egyptian deities either. Where does this come from?
Anyway, it isn't an established fact that Paul was replaced by another man, let alone that this man was a being invoked by Crowley by sexual ritual, let alone that he is Lam, the alleged son of Osiris. There are too many "what ifs" in this story. The story itself is entertaining and would make a good Dan Brown-style novel, but if you find it frightening instead of entertaining, it would really be much better for you to stop entertaining these what-ifs and note the lack of evidence.

Think about this: so the man we know as Paul McCartney is an Egyptian deity created by Alistair Crowley using sexual magic... and this Egyptian deity went on to have a successful music career and a mostly peaceful family life, receive an Order of the British Empire and campaign for animal rights and for various charities? Wouldn't this occult being prefer a more mysterious and sinister life?
 
wollclark said:
On the official site he demands a donation of $6.66 through PayPal to see his unreleased movies.

On one hand, a lot of this theory holds up to me, but I'm gullible. On the other, $6.66 is hokey and makes it seem like a !!!***money scam***!!!.

What do you think?
Click to expand...

Either it's this all impossible ridiculous nonsense orrr, Uhhh... duh...:jaw-dropp

Do you really need help with this one?
 
Maja said:
I love Egyptian mythology and I've read all the books about it I could find, but I have never come across any account of Osiris having a son, and I don't remember an Egyptian deity called Lam. I can't find him on any online lists of Egyptian deities either. Where does this come from?
Click to expand...

I've become confused by my own gullibility and imagination. I'm trying to make things fit.

All I know is the poster implying that Paul replacement is somehow connected with Aleister Crowley.
 
Two things:

First, the easier answer is the user with the name " i am a phoney" is screwing with you and a lot of people. And making his screen name so blatantly obvious to the fact as a way to twist the knife and get a bit more laughs out of it.

Second, go through any writers stuff and your going to find patterns and references to things.

As a writer i tend to like the numbers 30, 11 and reference things ranging from obscure myths ( the silot for one.) to conspiracy theories. Go through enough of my stuff, and i am sure someone could make some spooky theory as to how i am actually a silot, once they figure out what one is.
 
wollclark said:
I fairly certain I'm wrong due to the spiritual, magick nature to it, but something in me tells me it's possible, that's the gullibility I was talking about. I entertained the thought of me possibly being a paranoid schizophrenic last night, but I've never heard voices. Though the morning after I watched this I heard some noises and the creepy factor messed with me but I figured it was nothing. Also, I see people who aren't there out of the corner of my eye, it comes and goes, has since I was a small child.
Click to expand...
Actually Paul McCartney was replaced by an alien duplicate on the sixth of November 1966 as part of a plot to to return rock music to to its more conservative country roots and influence the political outlook of the young.
This culminates in the nuclear war of 1970. You can read all about it here.
Oh, and Yoko Ono was also a shape-shifting, four armed alien from a different universe, but that was obvious.:D
 
Elizabeth I said:
How could a name with no "l" in it sound like a name with an "l" in it? And how could a name with no long "o" in it sound like a name with a long "o" (as in moe)?
Click to expand...



**Tangent alert**

Both of those things are not only possible, but certain. I've spent a fair amount of time messing with backmasking and reverse speech -- not because I think there's anything significant about it, but just because my inner word geek finds it amusing. And I can assure you that lots of things sound very different backward than we would expect them to. For example, while we think of a long "i" sound as a single sound, it's really two vowel sounds run together: "ä" (like the "a" in "father"), and "ee." So when we hear it backward, the order of those sounds is reversed, and it becomes "ee-ä". The English word that sounds most like a long "i" backward is "yeah." There's tons of free software for any computer or smartphone that will let you play recordings backward, so try it and you'll see what I mean.

To the OP: The first and most difficult step in no longer being gullible is recognizing that you're gullible. By your own words, you're already there, which is good news. You also seem to understand that a lot of your reactions to these things are irrational, and are caused by fear rather than by actual reality. The trick is to act on what you know, rather than on what you fear. Stick around here and you'll find people who can be helpful and supportive with that. You'll also find a certain amount of rude and unhelpful responses, but hey, it's the internet, whatcha gonna do? Also, as a Louisiana resident, I enjoyed the fact that you listed being from Alabama as one if your challenges. :D
 
Last edited:
calebprime said:
Ok, I'm slightly curious: What part of this theory "holds up" to you?


eta: I INVOKE Dancing David! Great Spirit, come forth and Do Yer Funky Thang!


D, A, N, C, I, N, G, D, A, V, I, D
A, C, N, D, V, D, D, N, I, G, A, I
C, D, D, N, G, I, A, N, V, D, I, A
D, N, I, N, D, A, C, D, G, A, V, I
N, N, A, D, A, I, D, I, D, C, G, V
N, D, I, I, C, V, N, A, A, D, D, G
D, I, V, A, D, G, N, I, C, N, A, D
I, A, G, I, N, D, D, V, D, N, C, A
A, I, D, V, N, A, I, G, N, D, D, C
I, V, A, G, D, C, A, D, N, I, N, D
V, G, C, D, I, D, I, A, D, A, N, N
G, D, D, A, A, N, V, C, I, I, D, N
Click to expand...

man a major invokation!

Sweet sorry the meds block my psychic powers, that and the fact that the CT forums is too wierd even for me.

At this point all I can say is Paul is not Crowley, I doubt he has the penchant for anal receptive and coprophagia that Crowley did and his poetry is better,

Now if Paul Capitalizes things at Seemingly Random points, and uses the words Science alot...
 
Sir James Paul McCartney, MBE (born 18 June 1942)
Aleister Crowley (12 October 1875 – 1 December 1947)

Thread fail.
 
wollclark said:
Paul and the rest of the band were very interested in Aleister Crowley. I know a lot of you like to call backmasking bunkum but Crowley talked about backmasking in his books.

“Let him train himself to think BACKWARDS by external means, as set forth here following:

(a) Let him learn to write BACKWARDS. . .
(b) Let him learn to walk BACKWARDS. . .
(c) Let him. . . listen to phonograph records REVERSED.
(d) Let him practice speaking BACKWARDS. . .
(e) Let him learn to read BACKWARDS. . .
(f) Instead of saying “I am he” let him say “eh ma I”
Click to expand...

That is not backmasking at all, I believe it is teh sections on the discovery of teh HGA a,d teh exercise is to reveiew ones life in reverse, first in small chunks, the whole point being?

Not backmasking!

In the practice one supposedly learns to rewind ones life as it were and learn to run it backwards and then forwards. the whole point being that at some point one runs ones life backwards into the womb, and then past conception and into your past lives.

Sure whatever.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom