Ya sure, let's see what church position is on gas pipelines.
(That was supposed to be sarcastic. But given Kalnins' excitement about God's plan for Alaska's energy, you never know.)
Is her concept beneficial to Alaska?
Ya sure, let's see what church position is on gas pipelines.
(That was supposed to be sarcastic. But given Kalnins' excitement about God's plan for Alaska's energy, you never know.)
Now you are delusional. The politician you like pays "lip service" to religion. The ones you don't like are "true believers".Yeah, but is Obama a true believer? I have my doubts about both Obama and McCain, as well as Clinton. All American politicians have to pay lip service to religion. It's a political requirement. Bush strikes me as a true believer. So does Palin. IIRC, Obama has said he believes in Evolution, which rules out a literal interpretation of the Bible. 'Faith' then becomes more of a matter of conforming to social norms rather than actual woo.
I've been meaning to get back to this gullible statement.She's on record a vast number of times to the opposite.
I've been meaning to get back to this gullible statement.
Very little weight should be assigned to self serving statements from politicians running for office. If we're to blithely take candidates' self serving words as fact, most of the threads posted here would be nipped in the bud immediately.
And this is all the more true when the self serving statements are blatant white-washes.
No thank you. Once I've exhausted the thread topic I'll be glad to re-vist this however.Thank you for proving my point...
Want more?
I wouldn't say it's impossible, but she'll have to smarten up a bit. I figure she might might become a touchstone for the far right, sort of a Rick Santorum sort of character, but I cannot see her ever again being a national player.As much is this will certainly be laughed at, and make me even less respected by many of you here, I am going to just come out and say it.
I love Palin. She's awesome. She is a rising star. And she is going to be a major player in Republican politics in the coming years. I guarantee it. I'd even suggest that the Democrats know it to, by their ongoing effort to completely destroy her now before she can get there. It's not just about beating McCain/Palin in 2008 anymore. There is a concerted effort to destroy her politically, forever.
My only concern is that she is being pushed into the spotlight too early. It's like in the NBA, where players can now come out of high school.. You can have a great, solid rising star, and it's possible they can be pushed into the spotlight too early and then they have to make or break based on little experience. It's a chance for them to fall down, and then be ruined forever because of it. It's a risk. But I think she is good enough and strong enough to ride it out, and I predict she is going to give heartburn to the left for many years to come.
Whiplash,
I am so sorry that we ARE going to destroy your rising star's career. You can go to the bank on that. She'd have made a great Congressperson, though.
-Ben
Whiplash,
I am so sorry that we ARE going to destroy your rising star's career. You can go to the bank on that. She'd have made a great Congressperson, though.
-Ben
Yes, crawl back to a safe place. By the way, if the concept of Alaska as a refuge state is new to you, you really need to Google better.No thank you. Once I've exhausted the thread topic I'll be glad to re-vist this however.
As to the thread topic, if you can't bother to address the questions I pose to you then attempting dialog is a waste of time -- it's like trying to talk with a bot.
Here's a novel concept you might consider: How about sharing your knowledge instead of playing infantile games?By the way, if the concept of Alaska as a refuge state is new to you, you really need to Google better.
Sure, but I gotta admit to thinking this was obvious. Apparently not.Here's a novel concept you might consider: How about sharing your knowledge instead of playing infantile games?
I actually thought for a moment you had something to contribute, and not just more infantile drivel. Silly me.Sure, but I gotta admit to thinking this was obvious. Apparently not.
1. People have gone to Alaska to start a new life-it's a frontier. This isn't going to change. It has been a refuge state for a whole lot of people. Often ducking the law, bill collectors, other people/spouses, etc.
2. I'd like to not be bothered to count the number of "Alaska XXX/YYY/ZZZ (Wildlife, Fish, blah blah blah) Refuges" established as fact in Alaska.
I actually thought for a moment you had something to contribute, and not just more infantile drivel. Silly me.
Larry Kroons said:I'm going to give you a functional grip on the prophetic future ... You will be able to step out of here with a clear-headed confidence about what lies ahead, and how to live in light of that. That when the subject of prophecy and future events and the return of Jesus comes to your mind, it's not a clouded maze. You see with clarity and you're able to live with confidence ... I want to make sure you get some certain basic things locked in solid when the subject of the future comes up.
This is 200 proof self-serving presupposition. I haven't written one syllable about Obama in this thread. (Actually, I don't think I've ever posted on the subject of Obama's religious beliefs.)Thank you for proving my point: Now you are delusional. The politician you like pays "lip service" to religion. The ones you don't like are "true believers".
Another piece of work is Mary Glazer, part of Palin's prayer goup (time period unknown), Alaskan Independence Party member, and yes, another witch hunter.
(first :45 of video is silent)
Here's more Glazer gibbering about future terrorist attacks (scroll down).