Overlap between TWA 800 & 9/11 theorists

The most concering fact about TWA800- The final blame was a short in the wiring around the Center fuel tank. There was a repair directive issued, but no repairs were ever made to existing 747's.

I swear I saw a show, where they heated up a fuel tank, and put fuel in it, and ran sparks through it, to try and ignite it, and the voltage in the 747 wiring couldn't ignite the fuel cell
 
drewbot

I assume that the fuel tank contained mostly fuel vapour only and was not full of fuel? It is when the tanks are mostly empty and only have vapour in them that they are most susceptible.

The fin tanks on our jets filled up with nitrogen after they emptied of fuel, in case they had a round hit them while full of fuel vapours to avoid this sort of thing.
 
bofors said:
Yet again, JREFers appear not too bright.
Click to expand...

You shouldn't say bad things like that about yourself. After all, with your 400+ posts, you're a "JREFer" too.
 
Last edited:
Drewbot said:
The most concering fact about TWA800- The final blame was a short in the wiring around the Center fuel tank. There was a repair directive issued, but no repairs were ever made to existing 747's.

I swear I saw a show, where they heated up a fuel tank, and put fuel in it, and ran sparks through it, to try and ignite it, and the voltage in the 747 wiring couldn't ignite the fuel cell
Click to expand...

The NTSB did in fact recreate the conditions of F800, and no explosion occurred. Probably because they were trying to re-create an extremely improbable event. Shooting down a 747without leaving any of the characteristic high velocity penetrations of a missile strike would be another example of re-creating the conditions of a highly improbable event. So the question is, which highly improbable event is more highly improbable? I'd go with the spark theory.
 
Drewbot said:
The most concering fact about TWA800- The final blame was a short in the wiring around the Center fuel tank. There was a repair directive issued, but no repairs were ever made to existing 747's.

I swear I saw a show, where they heated up a fuel tank, and put fuel in it, and ran sparks through it, to try and ignite it, and the voltage in the 747 wiring couldn't ignite the fuel cell
Click to expand...

The tank did blow up after a high enough voltage.
 
TWA800 'Truth' Rises again on Fox

After we all thought this one had been laid to bed, Fox decides to resurrect another old conspiracy theory.

A group of whistleblowers, including a number of aviation experts, have come forward in a new documentary to claim that the official explanation for the crash of TWA Flight 800 was wrong and a gas tank explosion did not bring down the flight off the coast of Long Island 17 years ago.
Click to expand...

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/06/1...ak-silence-in-new-documentary-claim-original/
 
Graham2001 said:
After we all thought this one had been laid to bed, Fox decides to resurrect another old conspiracy theory.



http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/06/1...ak-silence-in-new-documentary-claim-original/
Click to expand...


Note: bofors is absent... mip


It will be interesting how these "experts" were gagged. If I investigated an accident it would be exposed within 30 days, not 14 years. Is EPIX into woo and BS.

The special features six former members of the official crash investigation breaking their silence to refute the officially proposed cause of the jetliner’s demise and reveal how the investigation was systematically undermined.
Click to expand...
Wow, they waited 14 years for what reason? Money???

Some members of the investigation might of collected parts that washed up on shore, etc.

http://www.epixhd.com/twa-flight-800/ Almost a month... What, the death of all the passengers is on hold for 28 days? BS flag is up...

http://whatreallyhappened.com/es/co...documentary-claim-original-conclusion-about-c

The usual suspects are in on the kill.

I think it is wise not to run the AC packs on the ground when the Center Wing tank is empty and not purged of fuel... Remember, don't run the AC packs for extended ground operations on the ground when the Center Wing tank is empty - aka heat...

How can you wait 28 days; oh, it is more woo, exactly like 911 truth. More fiction from those who mislead the dumb and dumber travelers during our brief visit on earth...

Is Fox playing to the mentally challenged? Will they bring up 911 truth nonsense again?
 
Last edited:
When planes crash, even into the ocean, you can usually gather up the pieces and reconstruct the plane.
 

Attachments

  • TWA flight 800.jpg
    TWA flight 800.jpg
    114.1 KB · Views: 5
WTC Dust said:
When planes crash, even into the ocean, you can usually gather up the pieces and reconstruct the plane.
Click to expand...
Important thing to do in an accident investigation. Not really important when you know why the plane crashed.

You do remember they did find pieces of the NY planes? :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
DGM said:
Important thing to do in an accident investigation. Not really important when you know why the plane crashed.

You do remember they did find pieces of the NY planes? :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

Not to mention the video evidence of what exactly happened. It's not like they could mistake it for a hydraulic failure or metal fatigue in the cargo doors. May be worth noting at this point they probably didn't find enough of the first two planes to do a reconstruction.
 
kid meatball said:
Not to mention the video evidence of what exactly happened. It's not like they could mistake it for a hydraulic failure or metal fatigue in the cargo doors. May be worth noting at this point they probably didn't find enough of the first two planes to do a reconstruction.
Click to expand...
But, there was plenty to prove there were planes. ;)

(not that there was a need)
 
WTC Dust said:
When planes crash, even into the ocean, you can usually gather up the pieces and reconstruct the plane.
Click to expand...
Hard to reconstruct melted aircraft parts. And reconstruction is not needed in a crime where the cause of the crash is known. (hint: you reconstruct a plane to find the failure... your claims are so easy to debunk)

Aircraft accident investigators... Oops, 911 was not an accident, there is no "Aircraft Accident" to investigate.

WTC Dust,
Aircraft accident investigators investigate accidents, not crimes. This is a fact. You imply there is a need to reconstruct the aircraft used on 911. You are wrong, and your claim is silly, irrational nonsense. You have fantasy on 911, not a surprise you have no idea what the NTSB does vs the FBI.

TWA 800 and 911 conspiracy theories are all based on ignorance and lies. Misleading people with useless lies like planes need to be reconstructed, are standard junk used to confuse others and the already confused author of the failed claim.
 
bofors said:
Great, so explain why we shouldn't believe General Parton when he says that a Continuous-Rod Warhead caused TWA 800 to go down.
Click to expand...
For one thing, Parton is a supporter of terrorist movements around the world.

He also sells a lot of BS about the way ANFO works.

He also made an ass of himself describing what he saw in the video from the Pentagon.
 
WTC Dust said:
When planes crash, even into the ocean, you can usually gather up the pieces and reconstruct the plane.
Click to expand...
Reconstructions are only done to determine the cause of an accident and to find ways to prevent similar accidents.

In this case, however, we know that the crashes were not accidents, but intentional controlled flights into terrain after unauthorized persons took control of the cockpit.

Preventing future such crashes is simple. You do not let unauthorized persons into the cockpit no matter what threats they make. Just point the jet to some remote landing spot and hope they don't blow you up over a populated area.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom