Over Unity is No Longer Disputable

I do not believe that any laws of physics need to be broken to create a "free" energy machine. I stated this in the OP.

I do know that not looking for a "free" energy device is the most ignorant act of all.

The people here are excuse makers, they sit around and think of reasons to not act. The saddest part of all this is those very people think that they are smart. Try actually opening you minds.

And what have you done in the great crusade, other than posting trollish remarks on an internet forum?

http://www.overunity.com

That is a link to an excellent forum with very intelligent individuals with great ideas on OU principals.
<snip>

(I mercifully cut out the part where you mention maintaining your dignity. Only because I'm trying to be serious here, and I couldn't stop laughing when I read it.)

G4, are you really citing the OU dot com forum... Where they've been discussing Finsrud's work of art for more than two years, now? Where they've pretty much concluded that it's fixed magnets combined with pendulum? It's a variation on a clock!

They even have a good animation there of how the pendulums are being used! Did you skip the thread in the forum on Finsrud? How can you cite it as a great source if you refuse to listen to the arguments there (too).

Finsrud, himself, has stated that anyone who wishes to reproduce his objet should make it clear that it's just that.... art, not an OU device or PPM.

The posters at OU.com are free energy fan boys. Much like many of the Steorn peanut gallery. But when push comes to shove (or maybe that should say "when push pendulum comes to shove pendulum") they're mostly posting "wow, wouldn't it be neat if.....".

You got all caught up in the Wow Effect of Steorn, and it's sad that the bubble has burst, but it's time to open your eyes. Finsrud's little work of art has been out there, with variations, since about 2003. It's a well-tuned mechanism (and as someone remarked, Sean McCarthy should've hired him to do his construction), but it's no more OU than my car is when I take the brake off on a hill. If the hill is long enough, and you film only the downhill run, it'll appear that there's some sort of miraculous force at work. If you keep the camera going until it gets to the flats, the car will still be moving, but more slowly, and eventually, it will stop.

The pendulum is the energy source. Give it a push and it gives the impetus* to the magnets. But eventually (and as Finsrud has stated), it runs down. The finer-tuned his mechanisms, the longer it runs.... BUT SOONER OR LATER IT RUNS DOWN.

*No, I'm not a scientist and I'm not even sure that I'm using even a good approximation of the right terminology, here. But I think that everyone can figure the gist of what I'm writing (as it's been said 132 times before in this thread, alone).

I'd eat crow and buzzard and vulture if OU was real. So far, it's not. The waste of time on these dreams is what makes Steorn and others nearly criminal in my mind. There are legitimate alternate energy sources out there, and they need to be explored, invested in, and researched. Carnival sideshows like Steorn are an abomination because they diffuse all the excited energy of you true believers, and have you investing your hopes in nonsense!
(I do not include Finsrud in that.... it's the greasy fan boys who've tried to elevate him to OU Deity! He's an artist, and evidently a very clever mechanic!)
 
Wow. Just "wow."

That's really the same thing as saying that there's never been a car that had an internal combustion engine as an energy source. Talk about harping on the trivial, and missing the big picture!

See you miss the whole picture. This is due to your arrogance.

Even if these pendulums are the energy source this device is truly extraordinary. Pendulums have never had the ability to do work for this length of time (other than a foucault, which is not practical due to it's size).

Try looking around for another device that can do anything even close to what we see this thing doing. The only thing that would make this device less impressive would be discovering that it is a hoax.
 
See you miss the whole picture. This is due to your arrogance.

HAHAHHAHAAHAA.

Oh... you're not joking.

Even if these pendulums are the energy source this device is truly extraordinary.

Is it over-unity?

The only thing that would make this device less impressive would be discovering that it is a hoax.

Just as well you're a skeptic so you know that's not the case then isn't it?
 
Even if these pendulums are the energy source this device is truly extraordinary. Pendulums have never had the ability to do work for this length of time (other than a foucault, which is not practical due to it's size).
Really?

Try looking around for another device that can do anything even close to what we see this thing doing.
These things aren't even uncommon. Here's a few to get you started.

The only thing that would make this device less impressive would be discovering that it is a hoax.
Why would it be a hoax? It does exactly what its inventor says it does: You start it by swinging the pendulum, it runs for a while, and then it stops.
 
What he's saying is there's no pendulum - oops - pendulums can't store energy - oops - pendulums can't store 40 minutes worth of energy.

:rolleyes:

What a complete load of crap. You do not have the slightest understanding of what you are talking about. This is uncomfortably obvious.

Why do you insist on replying?
 
See you miss the whole picture. This is due to your arrogance.

Even if these pendulums are the energy source this device is truly extraordinary. Pendulums have never had the ability to do work for this length of time (other than a foucault, which is not practical due to it's size).

Try looking around for another device that can do anything even close to what we see this thing doing. The only thing that would make this device less impressive would be discovering that it is a hoax.

Actually, there IS no "whole picture". My so-called arrogance doesn't even come into play.

You've been suckered, chum... get used to it, because by all evidence you're likely to get conned over and over again for the rest of your life.
 
What a complete load of crap. You do not have the slightest understanding of what you are talking about. This is uncomfortably obvious.

Irony meter 'asplode.

Why do you insist on replying?

Because watching you dig holes is fun.

And we're all waiting for a video of you eating crow.
 
What a complete load of crap. You do not have the slightest understanding of what you are talking about. This is uncomfortably obvious.
Are you suggesting that I have somehow mischaracterised your claims?

Why do you insist on replying?
Because you still haven't answered my very simple and direct question.

Tenth time:

What claim has the inventor made, and what evidence has he provided to support this claim?
 
Really?


These things aren't even uncommon. Here's a few to get you started.


Why would it be a hoax? It does exactly what its inventor says it does: You start it by swinging the pendulum, it runs for a while, and then it stops.

Wow that is an impressive link! Look at all those pendulums running and running, they seem to go on forever.

You have discovered the energy source!

I should start apologizing now.
 
Oh, by the way, a Foucault pendulum... is just a pendulum. There's no difference. (Though a Foucault pendulum has to be free-swinging, of course.)
 
Wow that is an impressive link! Look at all those pendulums running and running, they seem to go on forever.
Yep. They don't, of course.

You have discovered the energy source!
We explained that to you long ago.

I should start apologizing now.
Good call.

While you're working on that, eleventh time:

What claim has the inventor made, and what evidence has he provided to support this claim?
 
Actually, there IS no "whole picture". My so-called arrogance doesn't even come into play.

You've been suckered, chum... get used to it, because by all evidence you're likely to get conned over and over again for the rest of your life.

No Joe, I am sorry to disappoint you, but I happen to be very successful. I actually have a setup like the one you are admiring with your avatar.

I have to imagine the pathetic lives you people lead and feel very sorry for you.
 
That's right g4macdad - you get it all out now.

Once you've unburdened yourself of all that unfocused rage at being shown to be basically wrong about everything you can get down to chowing on some crow.
 
Yep. They don't, of course.


We explained that to you long ago.


Good call.

While you're working on that, eleventh time:

What claim has the inventor made, and what evidence has he provided to support this claim?

Look! Go back and reread the thread. "We" (to go along with your little delusion) all understand that the pendulums are not the energy source.(with a few retarded exceptions like yourself).

Do yourself a favor and look up pendulums and their capabilities, and don't come back until you actually understand what you read.:boggled:
 
How does that crow taste?

You realize we've had discussions with idiots before, right? The way you make incorrect claims and then change the subject when people point it out to you does not impress us.
 
Look! Go back and reread the thread. "We" (to go along with your little delusion) all understand that the pendulums are not the energy source.(with a few retarded exceptions like yourself).

Is that the royal we? Because you appear to be the only one who "understands" that pendulums are not the energy source.

Just who the **** are you referring to?

Do yourself a favor and look up pendulums and their capabilities, and don't come back until you actually understand what you read.:boggled:

Uh no, you do yourself a favour and look up thermodynamics and don't come back until you actually understand why over-unity isn't possible.
 
Look! Go back and reread the thread. "We" (to go along with your little delusion) all understand that the pendulums are not the energy source.(with a few retarded exceptions like yourself).

Do yourself a favor and look up pendulums and their capabilities, and don't come back until you actually understand what you read.:boggled:
A swinging pendulum can be an energy source. It isn't much, but it has oscillating kinetic and potential energy, hence it can be an energy source.
 
No Joe, I am sorry to disappoint you, but I happen to be very successful. I actually have a setup like the one you are admiring with your avatar.

Somehow, that justifies the utter nonsense you've been posting? Really?
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom