Ouija boards-the final word!

Azrael 5 said:
So its anecdotal.You weren't even there.Next!

They never lie.

Of course I wasn't there - you'd have to be insane to f*ck around with one of those things.
 
jambo372 said:
They never lie.

Of course I wasn't there - you'd have to be insane to f*ck around with one of those things.
What brings you to that conclusion?
 
jambo372 said:
They never lie.

Of course I wasn't there - you'd have to be insane to f*ck around with one of those things.
Jambo - I thought you'd got bored with trolling here?

You're a bit out of practise. That anecdote of an anecdote is far too weak. It's just going to be rejected without any particular interest. Come on, we know you can do better than that.

Remember the heady days of the dirty and dangerous children's centre story? Thhat was you on top form. I enjoyed that one.
 
Azrael 5 said:
What brings you to that conclusion?

I know them very well.

Using a Ouija Board is like a game of Russian Roulette with your soul.

When you see a powerful Spiritualist Medium, you KNOW precisely what spirits you're speaking with. The medium has control over the spirits. She can be selective about what spirits she allows in and which she doesn't. The medium can use their psychic faculties to manipulate the evil spirits and send them back to the higher side of life and permit only their good counterparts access to live people on the earth plane.

When you use a Ouija Board it's reversed. The spirits now have you under their control ... not vice-versa as is the case with a medium. The spirit will be able to deceive you at will and you cannot be sure who's moving that tumbler ... it could be anyone from dead relatives and friends to spirit guides to satan himself. Despite popular superstition smashing the tumbler after finishing the seance with the spirit board will not ward off any lingering spirits.

Ouija Boards have lead to mental illness and even demonic oppression. I had an acquintance who was taught at high school by an Irish priest who went through hell exorcising someone in Dublin who was exposed to the Devil. It eventually worked.
 
jambo372 said:
Ouija Boards have lead to mental illness and even demonic oppression. I had an acquintance who was taught at high school by an Irish priest who went through hell exorcising someone in Dublin who was exposed to the Devil. It eventually worked.
Of course Jambo. You have a friend/acquaintace who has experienced every paranormal event imaginable.

:rolleyes:
 
jambo372 said:
you'd have to be insane to f*ck around with one of those things.

Boy I'll say.

An old punk friend of mine once used a Ouija board to try and contact the spirit of Sid Viscious. He'd been trying on an off for a couple days, when suddenly, his classic Rickenbacker bass flew up and smashed into his practice amp. Cost him nearly $3000 to replace the gear. Seriously. I saw the remains of the guitar and amp the next day; and the stale beer stench in the room was awful. Terrible tragedy.

And worse, the only message the board ever spelled out was "Sod off, wanker".
 
jambo372 said:
I know them very well.

Using a Ouija Board is like a game of Russian Roulette with your soul.

When you see a powerful Spiritualist Medium, you KNOW precisely what spirits you're speaking with. The medium has control over the spirits. She can be selective about what spirits she allows in and which she doesn't. The medium can use their psychic faculties to manipulate the evil spirits and send them back to the higher side of life and permit only their good counterparts access to live people on the earth plane.

When you use a Ouija Board it's reversed. The spirits now have you under their control ... not vice-versa as is the case with a medium. The spirit will be able to deceive you at will and you cannot be sure who's moving that tumbler ... it could be anyone from dead relatives and friends to spirit guides to satan himself. Despite popular superstition smashing the tumbler after finishing the seance with the spirit board will not ward off any lingering spirits.

Ouija Boards have lead to mental illness and even demonic oppression. I had an acquintance who was taught at high school by an Irish priest who went through hell exorcising someone in Dublin who was exposed to the Devil. It eventually worked.


Either that is a very amusing parody, or you are the most deluded fool on the planet.


I'm going with fool.
 
Azrael 5 said:
Scientific evidence is what I want,Kip not tall stories.There is no evidence offered for believers point of view,only accounts of what supposedly happens. ;)

kopji how can I read the actual papers/tests listed on that link?

hi Azrael,
A couple of the books look like they might be good.
Research papers usually require a small fee to download.

There is a fairly long list of studies and papers here:

http://www.percepp.demon.co.uk/idmoimac.htm
 
Good evening.

I just purchased a ouija board for a seance I plan on performing ( yes it's a show, and yes they will know!) I had a hard time dertermining what kind of board to go with. My first reaction was to go with something that had very plain and easy to understand letters and symbols. But I also thought that something that looked old and might have some mystical property to it, would add to the effect.
I am lost here here as this will be my first attempt at a dinner/seance. I have time. Any advice?

JPK.
 
Jambo is correct, the ouija board has little or nothing to do with the ideomotor effect. Nice examples of the ideomotor effect are the way a pendulum will change its alignment when swinging and dowsing.

The force needed to move the pointer (plus everyone elses hands/fingers) is far to big to be explained by this.

Another hint as to what's going on is that dowsing and pendulum divining work with only one person (and that person appears to be able to genuinely deceive themself).

The ouija board has a far more prosaic explanation, one (or more) of the participants is conciously moving it around, and the rest are amazed.
 
Its still some part Ideomotor effect pjh.
Ouija Boards have lead to mental illness and even demonic oppression. I had an acquintance who was taught at high school by an Irish priest who went through hell exorcising someone in Dublin who was exposed to the Devil. It eventually worked
I had had a friend of friend who knew someone whose Dad worked with someone whose brother's next door neighbour's auntie once lost her purse in the supermarket!
Don't know how she survived. ;)
 
I used to be able to perform the Ouija by myself with a coin and home-made board. It did seem that a `force' was leading my finger. The ideomotor effect surely? And I recieved some strange replies to questions (my subconscious mind was having a field day!).

I can't seem to do it any more, my finger just rests on the coin unless I `think' the coin to move to a certain letter while relaxing my finger totally. Perhaps my subconscious knows I am more sceptical these days. :)

I also tried the Ouija with a pendulum, too - strange phenomena, as the pendulum (for me anyway) was flying around spelling out words and replies really fast! Again I can't seem to do it any more...

As for `entities' (ouija always seems like another `person' is replying) the subconscious can come up with multiple personalities. Might be an interesting study for psychologists.
 
pjh said:
Jambo is correct, the ouija board has little or nothing to do with the ideomotor effect. Nice examples of the ideomotor effect are the way a pendulum will change its alignment when swinging and dowsing.

The force needed to move the pointer (plus everyone elses hands/fingers) is far to big to be explained by this.

Another hint as to what's going on is that dowsing and pendulum divining work with only one person (and that person appears to be able to genuinely deceive themself).

The ouija board has a far more prosaic explanation, one (or more) of the participants is conciously moving it around, and the rest are amazed.

Regarding the upturned tumbler version of the Ouija in particular, I don't think the phenomena always needs someone conciously moving the glass around. I once tried an upturned tumbler with my wife, who'd never done it before, and I knew I wasn't deliberately moving it - and could see and feel that my wive wasn't deliberately moving it, as her finger actually lost contact with the glass at certain points. So perhap the ideomotor effect, or something like it, should be considered in these cases.
 
My sister has a ouija board and we were playing with it a few years ago. The pointer moved around a lot, sometimes so quickly I could hardly keep up with it. We weren't asking it questions, so it just kinda rambled about, sometimes repeating various number and nonsensical letter combinations. I thought it was pretty neat, and couldn't explain it...after all, it was not me moving it, right?

What really got my interest however was how the thing reacted later on that night after we'd been drinking. It didn't work worth a crap. The pointer barely moved, and when it did it was very sluggish and often simply went right off the side of the board. Hmmmm.... ouija boards don't like drunk participants? I began to have the glimmer of an idea that perhaps we were moving the pointer ourselves, whether it actually "felt" like it or not.

Once I read about the ideomotor effect, it all made sense. Of course it works differently when drunk. Everyone's motor control, ideo or otherwise, is sluggish and difficult to control (such as keeping something between the lines) when intoxicated.

I haven't had the opportunity to try it again now that I know the secret...I also wonder, will it work as well now that I know?
 
Welcome to the forum, Twilek.

That's a rather unusual way to get to figuring out the ideomotor reaction, but hey, anything that makes you a more active seeker of the truth is good in my book.
 
I've done the Ouija board a couple of times.

One time at Uni we asked to speak to Satan. He took an absolute age to spell out his name:
BELZEBUB

I guess he forgot how many Es his name contains.

After some very sluggish and dull answers we were all getting pretty tired. We asked if we could end the session and the glass moved to 'Yes' very quickly.
It was almost as though Satan was every bit as tired as we were. :)

Pjh - it definitely can be the ideomotor effect which is perfectly strong enough between a couple of people to move a glass.
It starts moving slightly and everyone helps it in that direction without conscious decision.

There isn't a cut-off point of 'force' that the ideomotor effect generates. It's not like an actual force - all it means is that you are moving something, but not deliberately.
So it could certainly move a glass. In theory it could work with just one of you, if you were quite suggestible. You would just ignore any signs that you were pushing the glass.

Funnily I noticed it moved much quicker when we all knew what the answer was going to be.
If you ask "Do you have a message for someone here" the glass will move to "Yes" nice and quickly, as everyone wants that to happen. Everyone is generating a smal amount of force towards the same target.
More complex or unknown answers were often slower - at least for the first few letters.

And everyone always says "I know I wasn't pushing it" - but the whole point is that you don't know that. I have seen the glass tilt before in a way that really looked like it was from pressure from my own finger, but I was sure I wasn't deliberately pushing it.

Of course sometimes is it just one person pushing and having a laugh.
 
An even freakier use of the ideomotor effect is table-tilting. I experienced this as a teenager, many years ago. I was completely fascinated and could never explain it. Like the ouija, I would love to try it again with some people now that I know how it works.

Thing is, even though I now know how the trick works, I still find it fascinating. How could it not be, to have this little parlor table bouncing around under one's fingertips? It's neat as hell.
 
Pjh - it definitely can be the ideomotor effect which is perfectly strong enough between a couple of people to move a glass.

Right then, how would you go about proving that, or getting any evidence whatsoever to back up such an outrageous claim?

Let's be clear here what I am saying - if a word is spelled out letter by letter say "Aunt Jessica" this is done by the concious control of one of the participants.

How would you go about providing any evidence for your position, that a word could be spelt without the person haveing any concious knowledge that they were doing it?
 

Back
Top Bottom