OS 0 1 2, Global Dialectic for the Internet

WWHP

Graduate Poster
W
Joined
Jul 10, 2005
Messages
1,623
hello. Nice to see a section to share links. I am new here, and my interests here are regarding a possible challenge to Randi and Co regarding 'Qi', as i am working with a Theoritical Physicist formally from Cal Tech who can manipulate 'Qi' and can also explain it through a hypothesis he put together using QM to explain this mysterious concept.

So! A challenge is forthcoming, and as soon as I get the time, i will introduce more of this topic.

But until then, I thought perhaps some of you would enjoy my favorite link on the net, and a perspective that I adopt rather effeciently.

http://www.highintelligence.com
 
Bubblefish said:
hello. Nice to see a section to share links. I am new here, and my interests here are regarding a possible challenge to Randi and Co regarding 'Qi', as i am working with a Theoritical Physicist formally from Cal Tech who can manipulate 'Qi' and can also explain it through a hypothesis he put together using QM to explain this mysterious concept.

So! A challenge is forthcoming, and as soon as I get the time, i will introduce more of this topic.
Click to expand...
I can't wait. I'm sure a Theoritical Physicist formally from Cal Tech will win the million easily with his amazing Qi powers. And once he wins, he can provide his QM explanation, too.

But until then, I thought perhaps some of you would enjoy my favorite link on the net, and a perspective that I adopt rather effeciently.

http://www.highintelligence.com
Click to expand...
Is that you favorite link or your homepage?
 
Re: Re: OS 0 1 2, Global Dialectic for the Internet

Donks said:
I can't wait. I'm sure a Theoritical Physicist formally from Cal Tech will win the million easily with his amazing Qi powers. And once he wins, he can provide his QM explanation, too.
Click to expand...


yes, that is the hope. I proposed to him the challenge as a novel way to aquire grant money, and he wants to move forward!

Is that you favorite link or your homepage?
Click to expand...

well, although it is certainly a website i sponser, it is not my homepage. I assume you mean homepage as a website that is about 'me', correct?

I have one of those, if your interested, but I dont think it's very interesting to most people, as it's mainly for buisness.

BF
 
I bet homepage.
It all looks so familiar.
Where have I seen that writing style before?
Not a native English speaker I would guess.
Fasten your seatbelts. There may be turbulence ahead.

The heck with it.

Hello Bubblefish.

I think your site is full of meaningless blarney. Before writing a universal grammar, I suggest brushing up your English.
(There are many non English speakers here and I would not normally be so impolite to a newbie. But I'm in a grumpy mood and you come across as an arrogant whippersnapper.)

So is English your first language?
Tell us about the challenge.
I could do with a laugh.
 
Re: Re: Re: OS 0 1 2, Global Dialectic for the Internet

Bubblefish said:
well, although it is certainly a website i sponser, it is not my homepage. I assume you mean homepage as a website that is about 'me', correct?

I have one of those, if your interested, but I dont think it's very interesting to most people, as it's mainly for buisness.

BF
Click to expand...
Well, I guess homepage may not have been the word for it, but I meant a website that you made. After all, the email on that website is also bubblefish.

Edit: What does the OS stand for? I started reading the about page and it seemed to be more about some problems at a message board than about OS 012.
 
Originally posted by Soapy Sam ]I bet homepage.
Click to expand...


not a very enticing bet

It all looks so familiar.
Where have I seen that writing style before?
Not a native English speaker I would guess.
Fasten your seatbelts. There may be turbulence ahead.
Click to expand...

lol, well, there most certainly is turbulence ahead, but so far your 'premonitions' are, ahem, false! I am ONLY an english speaker

The heck with it.

Hello Bubblefish.
Click to expand...

hello soapy, and how are you today?

I think your site is full of meaningless blarney. Before writing a universal grammar, I suggest brushing up your English.
Click to expand...

My friend, i did not come here to discuss OS 012, rather the challenge I mentioned above. If you wish to discuss OS 012, please go to the forum site, and challenge it there. I will inform you, however, that OS 012 is a highly effective dialectic, completly undefeated. So go over there if you want to have fun.

(There are many non English speakers here and I would not normally be so impolite to a newbie. But I'm in a grumpy mood and you come across as an arrogant whippersnapper.)
Click to expand...

lol, well, the arrogance is equally percieved on your end, my friend.

So is English your first language?
Click to expand...

yes

Tell us about the challenge.
Click to expand...

i will on a new thread in the appropiate forum. This forum is for 'links', so I posted a 'link' that i enjoy very much. I wish to follow forum rules and engage in respectful and rational debate.

If you dont enjoy the link, then dont go to it anymore. If your feeling 'spicy', then please go challenge it on the other forum

I could do with a laugh. [/B]
Click to expand...

me too! I just get the giggles when I think about this challenge between a Theoritical Physicist who has proof (along with a few others) that there is something more to 'qi' than mere imagination and bringing that challenge here to Randi.

I think it is going to be fun! stay tuned. and please, I am not here to discuss OS 012, as that will only be a distraction to the goal mentioned. however, I will use it, and any and all are welcome to discuss or challenge it's effeciency at the OS 012 forum.

if you want my homepage, it's here

www.highintelligence.info

THAT's my homepage. you just lost your bet, your not off to a good start, eh friend?
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: OS 0 1 2, Global Dialectic for the Internet

Donks said:
Well, I guess homepage may not have been the word for it, but I meant a website that you made. After all, the email on that website is also bubblefish.
Click to expand...

yes, I am the administrator for the site.

Edit: What does the OS stand for? I started reading the about page and it seemed to be more about some problems at a message board than about OS 012.
Click to expand...

OS is a playful signifier meaning more than one thing. Operating System. Open Source. And Objective/Subjective.

I recommend finish reading the introduction page, and read 'OS 012 in Theory' for further questions. really, now I regret posting it! I dont want this to be the distraction.

thanks for the questions though. Neat forum, I like it here.
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: OS 0 1 2, Global Dialectic for the Internet

Bubblefish said:
really, now I regret posting it! I dont want this to be the distraction.
Click to expand...
Well, if you didn't want it discussed, maybe you shouldn't have posted it. And if you get a thread going in the Challenge section, maybe something to discuss the protocol for testing Qi, I'm sure it will get very busy regardless of any other discussion about os 012.
 
Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: OS 0 1 2, Global Dialectic for the Internet

Donks said:
Well, if you didn't want it discussed, maybe you shouldn't have posted it.
Click to expand...

yes, agreed. this may have been a poor choice on my part. However, i dont mind discussing it, just not here. An OS 012 discussion usually turns into a continuous discussion that often last months, even years.

Anyway, thanks for the hello's. We will chat soon.
 
Wudang said:
Strange way of phrasing that sentence. And I think you mean "formerly" rather than "formally"? I'm with Sam. Work on English grammar first before working on a universal grammar.
Click to expand...

Howz this? Me say to you that you confuse grammar with dialectic, and then me say, hey, even if grammar wrong, the contained or inherint logic of the proposition is still applicable, even if ti is spilled wrong or tooo mani typos from writing to fast in internet.

You still get my point, right? amazing how that happens, eh?

If you wish to see the effectivness of the dialectic in debate, come by the forum, glad to see you i will.

Bubblefish
 
Bubblefish idea silly. Homepage shows Bubblefish in LA, home of most nutty things. Not disappointed now. Understand.

Zep really need drink now.
 
Bubblefish said:
Howz this? Me say to you that you confuse grammar with dialectic, and then me say, hey, even if grammar wrong, the contained or inherint logic of the proposition is still applicable, even if ti is spilled wrong or tooo mani typos from writing to fast in internet.

You still get my point, right? amazing how that happens, eh?

If you wish to see the effectivness of the dialectic in debate, come by the forum, glad to see you i will.

Bubblefish
Click to expand...

Anyone claiming expertise in a universal grammar who displays a poor grasp of, and little respect for, the grammar of the only language they speak has a lot of ground to make up. And, no, I am not confusing grammar and dialectic, thank you.

If your message isn't important enough to you to take the time to scan it once before posting it, what on earth makes you think I, or anyone else, should consider it any more important?
 
From hist "favourite web site":

Any idea that is opposed to OS 012 and the Human Union is irrational and crazy by default,...
Click to expand...

Definitely no discussion needed here, we have to agree as he said so. ;)

No discussion, no challenge, no content.

:bs:
 
Wudang said:
Anyone claiming expertise in a universal grammar who displays a poor grasp of, and little respect for, the grammar of the only language they speak has a lot of ground to make up.
Click to expand...


lol. never claim expertise in universal grammar i did not.


And, no, I am not confusing grammar and dialectic, thank you.
Click to expand...
appears that way it does when read the logic in post of yours

If your message isn't important enough to you to take the time to scan it once before posting it, what on earth makes you think I, or anyone else, should consider it any more important?
Click to expand...

wasnt thinking of you when wrote it I. Assume that most people understand quick replies on internet during busy day is irrelevant to topic of discussion.

Either way still read it you do, and understanding still same.

grammar is not message, only presentation of message. dialectic of OS 012 is about learning to read real message in dialogue, beyond presentation.
 
Zep said:
Bubblefish idea silly.
Click to expand...


lol. sometime, irrational people try to ad hominem debate, wish to use charge words to imply logical falsity when they no can argue using logic or reason.

Homepage shows Bubblefish in LA, home of most nutty things. Not disappointed now. Understand.
Click to expand...

irrational people reason funny. If Venice Beach/Hollywood in LA is nutty, then they think that means all ideas in Los Angeles nutty and false by default.

bubblefish think irrational people who think they smart are silly. they have education, but no reasoning or logic ability.

haha. that funny funny

Zep really need drink now.
Click to expand...

dont think that drink will make you understand, but enjoy it none the less
 
ingoa said:
From hist "favourite web site":



Definitely no discussion needed here, we have to agree as he said so. ;)

No discussion, no challenge, no content.

:bs:
Click to expand...

haha. that funny. glad you agree and back out of debate gracefully. best to save face that way.

enjoy this little exchange bubblefish did.
 
Just recently, to my utter amazement and delight, OS 012, a ternary dialectic for the internet and an artistic conceptual object, was banned and censored from discussion in a philosophy and logic forum called The Ponderer's Guild’ after almost a year of remaining the most popular topic.
Click to expand...

OS 012 was deleted, banned, and censored because the moderators that be at The Ponderers’ Guild were unable to find a rational or logical flaw in her system after publicly going on record as accusing OS 012 as being complete and utter B. S. 012.
Click to expand...

http://p088.ezboard.com/fponderersguildfrm29.showMessage?topicID=263.topic

Generally speaking, since it's their board they can pretty much do what they want to. But on most popular boards, they generally stick by their Code of Conduct. When they banned any further discussion of OS 012, did they mention which rule that you had broken?

Perhaps, this one?:
3. No Spam. Spam will be removed without notice. Anything that looks like spam will be removed without notice. Any thread attempting to proselytize will be removed without notice. If the same new topic is posted to two different forums, both copies will be removed without notice.

Or, maybe, this one?
# If a member is repeatedly annoying, they may be asked to stop or have their allowed posts limited (but not banned), even if the particular way in which they are annoying is not covered in these rules.

EDITED: their search function seems slightly broken. I can't even find the word 'dialectic' in their forums.

EDITED FURTHER: AH, Ok, you're Tumbleman. Now I can see your posts. Ah. Ok. Yeesh.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom