• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Oprah & Bush reincarnation case dismissed

Orphia Nay

Penguilicious Spodmaster
Tagger
Orphia Nay
Joined
May 2, 2005
Messages
52,435
Location
Australia
"A case in which a woman had sued Winfrey and the former first couple -- as well as three Charleston physicians -- after she claimed they all had conspired to implant a camera with wire sensors into her with the intent of reincarnation has been dismissed."
Kanawha Circuit Court case number: 09-C-2260
http://wvrecord.com/news/contentview.asp?c=224419


"Braxton claimed the defendants had poisoned her which caused her to have surgery on Feb 19, 2009 and Oct, 20, 2009. She claims that during the surgery the physicians implanted a 3-D Lucinda camera with film packs and plates and a wire sensor into her with the intent of reincarnation. She claims the defendants attempted to murder her and attempted to kidnap her grandchildren. She also claims she is being monitored 24 hours a day and is seeking $50 billion dollars. Braxton is representing herself."
http://opensalon.com/blog/kimhartman/2010/02/06/woman_sues_oprah

How does she think Oprah and the Bushes poisoned her? :con2:

How does she think a camera can cause reincarnation? :con2:

I'd love to read a copy of her complaint. :newlol
 
There should be a system where insane cases like this are thrown out without wasting any court time.
 
She claims that during the surgery the physicians implanted a 3-D Lucinda camera with film packs
Click to expand...
In 2009? I realise the woman's insane, but couldn't she at least be insane in the 21st century?
 
Marduk said:
errrr, has 2009 been moved then ?
:D
Click to expand...

"Braxton claimed the defendants had poisoned her which caused her to have surgery on Feb 19, 2009 and Oct, 20, 2009. S"

It's the date of the surgery that's important with regard to whether the technology allegedly implanted was outmoded.

I wondered about a possible rationale for using film. NASA use outdated technology for reliability on long time-scale missions. It's not that 20 year old technology is known to be more reliable than last years models. It's that nothing is known at all about how well last years models will be operating in 20 years time.

A similar argument might be constructed as to why film packs might be necessary. However since the images captured would only be accessible if they returned to remove the film it would appear that they would have to already have plans to service the technology.
 
I had one case where the defendant, a middle-aged-woman accused of a very minor offense (public peace disturbance and resisting) arrived in court to conduct her own defense.
She brought with her a mound of papers and documents at least 5" thick, all totally unrelated to the case....
Unfortunately, nothing so entertaining as implanted cameras and conspiracies involving the White House.
 
I had one case where the defendant, a middle-aged-woman accused of a very minor offense (public peace disturbance and resisting) arrived in court to conduct her own defense.
She brought with her a mound of papers and documents at least 5" thick
Click to expand...

I do that in traffic court, just to tick off the DA, and to automatically win my case.
Turns out, they don't want to try traffic tickets, they just want to go home or whatever.
 
Wondering why she chose those 3, made me wonder if she'd heard messages through the tv? You read a lot of that, the sad sites who think the same kind of things. Its very funny for five minutes, but very sad after a while.
Funny thing being sleepy by the tv, or waking to it...you do think someone has spoken to you, or talked about you sometimes. Or is that just me???? (Hopefully I can just read those sites and I'm not ready to join them..... :rolleyes: )
 
Ocelot said:
"Braxton claimed the defendants had poisoned her which caused her to have surgery on Feb 19, 2009 and Oct, 20, 2009
Click to expand...

so you don't think 2009 is in the 21st century either ?
I must be missing something
:D
 
Marduk said:
so you don't think 2009 is in the 21st century either ?
I must be missing something
:D
Click to expand...

He's saying that since the surgery was in 2009 (the 21st century), they shouldn't be implanting film packs in her brain. (i.e. they should use a digital camera with wi-fi or 3G :D)
 
Ferguson said:
He's saying that since the surgery was in 2009 (the 21st century), they shouldn't be implanting film packs in her brain. (i.e. they should use a digital camera with wi-fi or 3G :D)
Click to expand...

nooo, you know the Bushes and Oprah
totally insidous, they gotta use that old film stock up somehow
Like shes still selling books on her show, not pdf's or word docs, why wouldnt she still be using film
:D
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
New SCOTUS Case Against Obama Docketed
2 3 4
Replies
64
Views
6K
Brown
Brown
A
Skeptic NewsSearch - 10/24/03
Replies
0
Views
3K
Agent13
A

Back
Top Bottom