Brown
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2001
- Messages
- 12,984
I think the point can be taken further:Mark said:Why is no one talking about the fact that the reason Newsweek ran the story is because they were given the "details" by someone in the Pentagon!!!!!!!!!
There's a lot of b*tching from the Bush "administration" about how the source was an unnamned source. The Bush gang, however, has a track record of cruelty against those who speak in their own names and say something--even if true--that makes Bush look bad. As a result, sources are forced to be anonymous, lest they receive retaliation from the Bush gang. In addition, Bush and his people have had serious difficulty telling the truth, especially (but not exclusively) pertaining to international affairs. Accordingly, the media's reliance upon unnamed sources has been effectively forced by the Bush "administration."
In addition, the hallmark of the Bush "administration" has been its steadfast refusal to accept responsibility for any of its actions, if doing so would make Bush look bad.
Further, it is worth noting that, according to CNN, the Red Cross has collected several reports about U.S. personnel at the Guantanamo Bay naval base disrespecting the Quran. The Red Cross says it deems the reports "credible" and brought the issue up with the Pentagon "several times" prior to the Newsweek report.
So there's a lot of fingers pointing at Newsweek, but it seems to me that the buck really stops with the military and the commanders, specifically including the commander-in-chief.