• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Only for the guys

Ed

Philosopher
E
Joined
Aug 4, 2001
Messages
8,658
Re. Coulter.

We guys all think alike which is why I did not invite chicks here.

Tell me, would you, you know, do her? Oh, right, no chicks here so we all know we would. But, there is a price to be paid.

I sorta think that she'd be a pain in the ass during and after. Particularly after. I don't think she ever shuts up.

I saw her on O'Reilly the other day, and all I could think of was going to sleep with that jabbering and then waking up with it. It is also a naselly drone. Might not be worth it.

I sorta think that she is one of those "her" chicks. You know "well, I ...." and "So, I said ..." IIIIIIIIIIIII.

Gives me shivvers.

Shhhhh. We can go back now, don't tell the chicks what we were talking about.
 
What was it Jeffery Ross said to Sandra Bernhart? Something like:

"I wouldn't ◊◊◊◊ you with Bea Arthur's d**k."

That kind of sums it up. Not really a political thing as much she strikes me as reptillian.
 
Her nauseating political stance aside, i wouldn't do her unless I was really desperate (and I can't imagine myself ever getting that desperate -- there are plenty of normal-looking men and women around).

She is stick-thin, a smoker, and has a face that takes a lot of makeup and nice camera angles to make her look good on book covers. She is not ugly per se, but she is certainly not beautiful, nor even pretty nor cute; neither her face nor her body. I utterly lack the blondness fetish that's so popular among the US men, and that's the only other feature of hers that I could have found attractive; and her anorexic thinness is a major turn-off.

Al Franken is at least genuinely funny, and humor is sexy; but Coulter? No, I really don't think so.
 
Well, I don't think I would, honestly.

I mean at least.....not sober. (you should see what I would do drunk...but that's another story.)

And it's not really about her politics. She strikes me as thin not because she's fit and active, but thin because she starves herself until her skin hangs off her arm bones like a sun dried change purse made from elephant skin.
 
Victor Danilchenko said:
Her nauseating political stance aside, i wouldn't do her unless I was really desperate (and I can't imagine myself ever getting that desperate -- there are plenty of normal-looking men and women around).

She is stick-thin, a smoker, and has a face that takes a lot of makeup and nice camera angles to make her look good on book covers. She is not ugly per se, but she is certainly not beautiful, nor even pretty nor cute; neither her face nor her body. I utterly lack the blondness fetish that's so popular among the US men, and that's the only other feature of hers that I could have found attractive; and her anorexic thinness is a major turn-off.
Click to expand...

Interesting. You basically just described Rexella Van Impe. With whom I am equally not enamoured.
 
Ixnay, a chick.......

Oh, nothing.

......

Yeah, we'll be in in a second.....

Ok, continue.
 
No way. As I've said before, something about that face just screams "b*tch".

My b*tch-dar system is highly developed. She'd set it off at a hundred paces.
 
That sums it up ... bitch and reptilian with a nasel drone ....

But, the doing, per se, is a given...... the question the the penalty after.
 
Ed said:
That sums it up ... bitch and reptilian with a nasel drone ....

But, the doing, per se, is a given...... the question the the penalty after.
Click to expand...

No way, man. My mighty redwood would bend like the willow at the mere prospect.
 
Well, I'm willing to step up and admit it. I'd do it without remorse. Cute? No. Sexy? Yes. How? It's intangible.
 
pgwenthold said:


Interesting. You basically just described Rexella Van Impe. With whom I am equally not enamoured.
Click to expand...


:D :roll:

She is a trip. I love that name, too. You couldn't make up such a character.
 
I would have to think about it. But one definate condition would have to be that she would be forbidden to speak before, during or after the act. Having to listen to her would be a deal breaker.
 
Not with a paper bag and the lights off. She seems like the type to follow you around forever wanting a relationship.
 
corplinx said:
[snip]
She seems like the type to follow you around forever wanting a relationship.
Click to expand...
That's the way a woman a man has sexual relations with should be.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom